|
That's why i gave you such a great book suggestion. You should read it.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
I m using ASP.NET AJAX modalpopup extender and I want that when popup is displayed and something is written on the textbox of ModalPOPUP, i could get that value in a variable. How can i get it?
Regards.
Ali
|
|
|
|
|
Don't post across multiple forums.
The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec² - Marcus Dolengo
|
|
|
|
|
This forum is for sharing Knowledge not Imposing your opinion. i think ASP.NET IS PART OF WEB DEVELOPMENT. ISN'T IT?
|
|
|
|
|
NO.
There's a forum on this site specifically for ASP.NET because there are a huge number of topics related to ASP.NET that are utterly irrelevant to WebDev in general. For instance: when i want a pop-up, i don't use any "extender", i just write the damn pop-up. Then i kick myself in the head for using pop-ups.
If you want to ask a general question on implementing a pop-up, or better yet, alternatives to pop-ups, then come and ask them here. If you have questions on the bizarre ASP.NET ways of doing things, then go ask them in the forum created expressly for such questions.
And here's one more bit of knowledge i'll kindly share with you: there are certain rules here on the site that you might be informed of from time to time when you demonstrate your inability to recognize the obvious. Abusing the people who are kind enough to warn you is just going to make you look like a jackass, and discourage those would might otherwise be willing to help you. 
But who is the king of all of these folks?
|
|
|
|
|
Syed Ali Raza Rizvi wrote: This forum is for sharing Knowledge not Imposing your opinion.
My opinion IS knowledge. ASP.NET IS a part of Web Development. And these forums DO have rules, one of which is not to cross post, and you did so.
The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec² - Marcus Dolengo
|
|
|
|
|
yes You are right but I posted in both forums because I though may be some one knows about my problem in other forum that is why. Any way Sorry for my mistake.
Regards
Ali
|
|
|
|
|
Hey all - new to the site and could really use some help.
My situation: I have a form that needs to post results to a specific URL (which is on a different server and I have no control over). Essentially it is a lead generating form...
But after I post to the URL, I want it then to redirect back to a page on my site, a thank you page.
I believe I need some sort of form processing script, where the form results are processed, sent to the URL and then the script redirects or displays a Thank you message.
I don't know how to write such a script though.
I know that the form action will need to call the script, but I don't know how to pass the results to the processing script nor how to make the script then POST them to the URL.
Any help would be greatly appreciated - Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
So you want to fetch the contents from another domain(cross domain). i used sockets to do that.
if you are using php then use the function fsockopen. this is very simple comparing to win32 function.
if you are using java then use the Socket class...
you can get lots of codes or links regarding this in google.
the php maunal gives you an example program which is working will for me with a little modification.
and after all the basic concept for all lauguages is the same for sockets... or HTTP so ...
if you want more specific reference then ping me again...
Today's Beautiful Moments are
Tomorrow's Beautiful Memories
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I want to know if it is best practices to add styling directly to you web page, or should everything be referenced to a stylesheet? I jsut want to add a to a couple of words.
Brendan
|
|
|
|
|
Ideally, you'll keep styles in a stylesheet. So for instance, if you wanted something like this:
As preparations draw to a close for the April release, we need to keep in mind that it is crucial that all developers work to keep QA informed of pending updates.
...you might then use this markup:
As preparations draw to a close for the April release,
<em class="Warning">we need to keep in mind</em>
that it is <em>crucial</em> that all developers work to keep
<abbr title="quality assurance">QA</abbr> informed of pending updates.
...and this stylesheet:
EM { font-style: italic; }
EM.Warning
{
border: 1px solid red;
padding:5px;
margin: 20px;
background-color:#FFE3E0;
}
ABBR { border-bottom: dotted 1px black; }
But who is the king of all of these folks?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Like anything, it's a matter of preference, I suppose. But consider this: if you are styling more than one page (say 10? 100? virutal pages?) the external CSS is most effective since you can make simple changes in the CSS which cascade throughout your entire site. If you do the changes inline, then you need to copy/paste the code to each page you want to benefit from it. The more efficiently you work, the more productive and cost-effective you'll be.
_________________________________________________
Have a great day!!!
-- L.J.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
i wonder how singleton works on webservices(WS).
In normal(WinForms) application im using singleton for handling database connection - dont wasting time for creating new connection etc. So i wonder how it looks on WS - singleton instance is created one for each client? Or maybe one for whole WS? Any idea? Or maybe i shouldnt use singleton in WS?
Greetings
|
|
|
|
|
yarns wrote: Or maybe i shouldnt use singleton in WS?
No maybe about it. Connection pooling[^] is what you want to use on a server.
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have the following border width:
border:solid 1px #b7cceb;
1px is too thin, and 2px is too thick, is there something like 1.5px? 
Thanks
Brendan
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. But since most browsers don't do sub-pixel rendering, you might have some issues.
blah blah blah
But who is the king of all of these folks?
|
|
|
|
|
Shog9 wrote: But since most browsers don't do sub-pixel rendering
Which ones do? Just curious.
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
Firefox will... sorta.
Rather, it won't actually draw a border smaller than 1 pixel, but it will draw adjacent .5px borders as 1px, so somewhere it's keeping track.
blah blah
[Edit: and apparently, it doesn't even do that when in Quirks mode, so i can't properly demo this on CP...  ]
But who is the king of all of these folks?
|
|
|
|
|
Shog9 wrote: but it will draw adjacent .5px borders as 1px
That's sort of what IE does in tables with the "collapse" style but you can't actually draw half a pixel. I mean there is no support for that at the device level right? - still mildly confused -
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
led mike wrote: I mean there is no support for that at the device level right? - still mildly confused -
Well, it depends on how you think about it. If you're zooming in on a document, for instance, you might well have "pixels" rendering as multiple device pixels. You could conceivably also render a 1.5px black horizontal line on a white background as a 1px black line, with a 1px gray line above it. That example would probably just end up looking blurry though.
But who is the king of all of these folks?
|
|
|
|
|
Shog9 wrote: Well, it depends on how you think about it.
You mean like if you think about it like "I'm flying in an airplane therefore gravity must have ceased to exist"?
Yeah that's what I thought. I could stand on my head and do a tap dance too but you still can't draw half a pixel.
I eat my peas with honey.
I've done it all my life.
It makes the peas taste funny.
But it keeps them on my knife.
led mike - peas out 
|
|
|
|
|
led mike wrote: You mean like if you think about it like "I'm flying in an airplane therefore gravity must have ceased to exist"?
More along the lines of, "I need this vehicle to travel at 15 Miles Per Day, even when it's on Mars where days are longer". Your reference point can change, and you may not want your results to change with it. This works both ways; for instance: if you print a web page, you almost certainly don't want 1px to equal 1 dot on the page.
And FWIW, on an LCD display you actually can do sub-pixel rendering by taking into account the layout of colors in each pixel - this is how ClearType operates.
But who is the king of all of these folks?
|
|
|
|
|
Shog9 wrote: this is how ClearType operates.
From Wikipedia: so the red bold text refers to the "device as defined by the API" that you as a developer have access to through the OS or software layer you are using. It appears that currently we don't have access to the subpixel capabilities but since they are in three colors, even if you do you still can't draw half a pixel. Thanks though for discussing this with me, prompting me to do some reading rather than just typing and running my mouth like I usually do! 
Wikipedia snips
--------------
Like most other types of subpixel rendering, ClearType actually involves a compromise, sacrificing one aspect of image quality (color or chrominance detail) for another (light and dark or luminance detail). The compromise improves text appearance because when viewing black and white text, luminance detail is more important than chrominance. The compromise works because it takes advantage of certain peculiarities of human vision.
and
Normally, the software in a computer treats the computer’s display screen as a rectangular array of square, indivisible pixels, each of which has an intensity and color that are determined by the blending of three primary colors: red, green, and blue. However, actual display hardware usually implements each pixel as a group of three adjacent, independent subpixels, each of which displays a different primary color. Thus, on a real computer display, each pixel is actually composed of separate red, green, and blue subpixels. For example, if a flat-panel display is examined under a magnifying glass, the pixels may appear as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
You are correct. A pixel is the smallest rendering point at the device level. You can't technically draw half a pixel. But there are ways to make it look and feel as if you had, but it would look blurry without a high resolution screen.
The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec² - Marcus Dolengo
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
