|
|
|
He actually put it in three forums and then deleted them all. Pathetic.
|
|
|
|
|
leckey wrote: He actually put it in three forums and then deleted them all. Pathetic.
Another entry for the blog of shame.
|
|
|
|
|
if u guys are not interested to help.. jus ass lock and ignore..
you cannot comment on others..
Message boards are intended to discuss.. Not Chat or Comment or stuff..
There are 5,108,764 in the site.. Why it aches on your ass wn others ignores them...
"People gives advice wen there is a need of help..
And wen there s a need of an advice...They do the same"...
Useless creatures..
|
|
|
|
|
Well, thank you for that incoherent babble. It's always a pleasure to insert the missing characters in a sentence.
shabbu wrote: you cannot comment on others..
To quote Dr Cox from Scrubs:
"Wrong wrong wrong wrong, wrong wrong wrong wrong. Wrong"
|
|
|
|
|
shabbu wrote: Message boards are intended to discuss.
But this guy decided to spam the site with the same question multiple times. This isn't discussing - IT'S SPAMMING!
shabbu wrote: Not Chat or Comment or stuff..
So someone posts a response to a question and the rest of us are not allowed to comment on it?? What definition of "discussion" are you using?? 
|
|
|
|
|
We are not interested in helping people who flagrantly break the rules.
As for you, please learn English.
shabbu wrote: Useless creatures..
Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
|
|
|
|
|
We've got a live one chipping in on this conversation.
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously someone started a new ID to start a flame war. I hate these little buggers who try to insult us and do it with English so bad I just start laughing. Seriously, who would come up with "jus ass lock and ignore?"
|
|
|
|
|
leckey wrote: Seriously, who would come up with "jus ass lock and ignore?"
Sounds like advertising for one of those diarrhea adds.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey come on guys. I was in need of that program. Had lesser time to do. so I thought someone would help if they have such similar codings. When I was told that it was a mistake, I accepted it and deleted the message. But I never thought it would end like this. I apologize for the mistake(for cross posting). I have prepared the program and the issue is over. So ignore it.
modified on Thursday, May 8, 2008 2:08 PM
|
|
|
|
|
You should have deleted 2, and left 1.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyways none is ready to help..Right.. I feel that I shouln't have put it here..
|
|
|
|
|
F***ing people al over the site!!!
modified on Thursday, May 8, 2008 5:11 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
shabbu wrote: Do not hit 'reply' to this email: To reply, click here.
shabbu has posted a reply to your message at "Personal Page for Member 283762":
u stink like a pig in your behavoiur..
[sleepy]
Excuse you? I'm not one stinking up the boards with all kinds of abusive crap.
|
|
|
|
|
shabbu wrote: u stink like a pig in your behavoiur..
LOL!!! why didnt Monty Python think of that?
It would have fit in perfectly...
French gaurd:
"I dont wanna talk to you no more you empty headed animal foot
trough water! u stink like a pig in your behavoiur...I fart in your general direction! Your mother was a hamster and you father smelt of eldiberry!!!!"
|
|
|
|
|
Watch it or you'll make it in the Top 3 of my list. 
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Guys
I am trying to bind a dataset table to combobox, and it works perfectly. But when the dataset table got changed (addition or deletion of rows) doesn't reflected in combobox items.
Am i supposed to set combox1.datasource=ds("table") after every change to the dataset table.
Thanks in advance
Warm Regards
Mohamed Faizal 
|
|
|
|
|
rmfaizal wrote: Am i supposed to set combox1.datasource=ds("table") after every change to the dataset table.
Yes.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I'm quite new to .NET framework, though I am quite experienced in C++.
I have this problem I can't seem to solve under .NET framework. I'm using VS2008, so the new syntax is used as well to describe it.
In short I wouldlike to pass a String object to a function that "fills" it with some calculated content, and then the string can be used by the callee with the new content. This can be done with simple passing by reference under "normal" C++, but not with .NET.
Something like this:
System::Void ParserCaller() {
String ^name1, ^name2;
FillThis(name1, name2);
System::Console::WriteLine("1) {0}, 2) {1}", name1, name2);
}
System::Void FillThis(String ^name1, String ^name2) {
name1 = "Anything calculated or retreived from some other source";
name2 = "Anything calculated or retreived from some other source again";
}
As you see returning both strings as return parameter is not possible.
Is there a way to obtain the above with .NET object handles?
Thansk in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
Managed String objects are immutable under .NET. You can't change an existing string, you can only return a new string. A StringBuilder object can do what you want though, since it's treated as an array of characters instead of a string. You can get the string equivilent out of the StringBuilder by calling it's ToString method.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks a lot. I'm going to look for the StringBuilder object then.
/edit: I managed to get exactòy what I wanted with the StringBuilder object.
How annoying there's not a clear() method for it, BTW.
Is setting the string length to 0 the best method to clear it or there's a smarter way to do that?
Thanks again
modified on Tuesday, May 6, 2008 11:23 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Ciccio7 wrote: Is setting the string length to 0 the best method to clear it or there's a smarter way to do that?
Setting the length to 0 works just fine. If the length property is increased, any new characters added to the existing length are automatically initialized to 0, or Unicode NULL. This prevents the previous contents of the stringbuilder from being recovered and prevents the stringbuilder from being used to "capture" the previous contents of memory, closing a possible security hole.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
