|
HERE I USE ID AS AUTOINCREMENT
|
|
|
|
|
no caps until you have something special to say else it consider as you're shouting and nobody will reply you. Plus use Edit button at botton-right corner of the message to edit it. 
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia> -----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
try using square brackets around your column names. i.e. [Column1], [Column2] etc.
Also, do not include your AutoNumber column when inserting, this will be assigned automatically - you cannot write to it manually
third thing - make sure you use command parameters with your code...
cmd = new OleDbCommand("INSERT INTO Table1 ([column1], [column2]) VALUES (@1, @2)", cn);
cmd.Parameters.Add("@1", OleDbType.Char).Value = textBox1.Text;
cmd.Parameters.Add("@2", OleDbType.Char).Value = textBox2.Text;
NOTE how the column names have been specified to avoid trying to insert into the AutoNumber column
Life goes very fast. Tomorrow, today is already yesterday.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
I have an application that contains a richtextbox with ole objects embedded into it.
The ole objects are imported from source files.
I am able to edit all embedded objects in their respective native applications except for powerpoint objects.
The powerpoint objects are activated as powerpoint slideshows and thus its not possible to edit these objects in native application.
Is it possible to change the default activation of ole powerpoint embedded objects from powerpoint slideshow mode to powerpoint presentation editing mode?
If not i also worked with the code (http://www.codeproject.com/KB/edit/richtextboxplus.aspx)
IRichEditOle richEditInterface = this.RichText.GetRichEditOleInterface();
// Create an object to hold info about the requested RTF object.
REOBJECT reObject = new REOBJECT();
IntPtr pPptObject = IntPtr.Zero;
richEditInterface.GetObject(0, reObject, GetObjectOptions.REO_GETOBJ_POLEOBJ)
// (You can get a GUID using the OLE/COM object viewer.
Guid guid = new Guid("{64818D10-4F9B-11CF-86EA-00AA00B929E8}"); // this is the GUID for powerpoint
// Query for the interface we want.
Marshal.QueryInterface(reObject.poleobj, ref guid, out pPptObject );
//i hope the following code typecasts the ole object (actually a powerpoint) into a powerpoint - but i have no clue of it
PowerPoint.Presentation ppt = (PowerPoint.Presentation)Marshal.GetTypedObjectForIUnknown(pPptObject, typeof(PowerPoint.Presentation));
Is it possible to use above code to activate this in powerpoint application editing mode?
Regards
GJ
|
|
|
|
|
Hi.
Can we run a C# App on a system without installing .NET Framework ?
Is it possible ?
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
well i assume you mean a C# App that uses the .Net Framework?
You could try copying the .Net Framework .DLL files that your app needs to its local directory and reference those files in your app. I think it is posible in VS or SD to set if a reference is a local copy or not. I not played with it thou so i cant be sure
Life goes very fast. Tomorrow, today is already yesterday.
|
|
|
|
|
musefan wrote: well i assume you mean a C# App that uses the .Net Framework?
You mean we can write a C# App without .NET Framework !
So, how ?
|
|
|
|
|
Well C# is just a language so.... i wouldnt know what to suggest you use it with thou. I have done game development with C# and XNA but i dont recall if it uses the .net framework thou.
Why is it you dont want end user machines to have .Net framework?
My suggestion would be just to include the .Net framework redistributable with your applications setup
Life goes very fast. Tomorrow, today is already yesterday.
|
|
|
|
|
|
musefan wrote: You could try copying the .Net Framework .DLL files that your app needs to its local directory and reference those files in your app.
no, it wont work. I tried that when I start programming, copied every known DLL in executable directory and got a nice looking .Net not installed error.
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia> -----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
Try Xenocode Postbuild
Run your application on any Windows PC - Native x86 executable generation allows your .NET application to run anywhere, with or without the Framework. Embed application-specific .NET and DirectX dependencies. (Windows 9x and NT4 targets not supported.)
|
|
|
|
|
Alas, It's not free 
|
|
|
|
|
Depending on what you want to accomplish xenocode might not do what you want. IT doesn't actually convert your app into a native one. It wraps a compiler and the used parts of the framework into a single giant exe and then obfuscates them. At run time it then extracts everything and runs it just like a normal .net app.
Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots.
-- Robert Royall
|
|
|
|
|
That officially qualifies as a stupid question.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: That officially qualifies as a stupid question.
Hi John .
How do you do today ? 
|
|
|
|
|
Why would you want to do this? And in short, you can't. C# is very closely linked to the .NET Framework and you can't run C# apps without the framework although there are dubious products which claim you can.
The framework provides all the managed code support (garbage collection, verifiable code, reflection, security etc) for instance.
Regards,
Rob Philpott.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Rob. I don't want to do that.
I've wanted to know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
bad idea[^], isnt it ?
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia> -----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terrific , thank you 8kelvin 
|
|
|
|
|
The best solution, put .Net Framework setup with your app. But if you want to run your app without .Net Framework then you should try or buy Xenocode Virtual Appliance[^]
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia> -----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
I've got it 
|
|
|
|
|
DotGNU[^]
Mono[^]
ILDJIT[^]
XenoCode was already mentioned as a linker, but there's also one from RemoteSoft[^].
The .NET framework is *free*, why would you want to avoid it? That's like doing C++ programming without MFC
I are troll 
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: That's like doing C++ programming without MFC
You mean the only way C++ programming is bearable?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
