|
Hi,
FYI :
While Replying to any post, please make sure you are Replying to the right person. Because the link which you have provide may be useful to that person who had posted this question. But if you are replying me, he will not get the reply until he visited the site, But if you directly reply to his own message and if his mail filter is on, He will get an email notification. So that he can track of it. 
|
|
|
|
|
Hi everyone,
How would I go about taking X number of inputs and combining them all to create an 'output ID'? The key thing about the ID is that it should take all the inputs into account (preferably with weighting such as having X1 slightly more important than X2) and produce a number where number can be used to compare similarity. For example:
A) Inputs 1,2,3 ---> <perform function=""> ---> 0123456
B) Inputs 1,2,4 ---> <perform function=""> ---> 0123457
C) Inputs 5,3,8 ---> <perform function=""> ---> 1354565
Notice A and B are similar, so the outputs are similar to each other than A/B and C.
Thank you for any help
modified on Friday, July 24, 2009 6:43 PM
|
|
|
|
|
If your inputs are very small integers, say for example 1 or 2 digit numbers, and you have a small amount of them, then you might simply use a sum of factors.
Just put your X's in order by weight so that X1 has the bigger weight and so on, then (supposing you are using 2 digit integers) just do something like (code is in C# but neutral enough):
long ID = (X1 * 1000000) + (X2 * 10000) + (X3 * 100) + X4;
Comparison with other IDs to find similarity can now be done using a threshold:
if (Math.Abs(ID1 - ID2) <= Threshold) ...
I know, too many "IF"s to be useable, but I hope this can somehow help. 
2+2=5 for very large amounts of 2
(always loved that one hehe!)
|
|
|
|
|
Good. But maybe you could use smaller and more close numbers to multiply, or else a slight diferent X1 will never pass a threshold, and a very different X4 will always pass.
I think you could do the same with different weights:
long ID = (X1 * W1) + (X2 * W2) + (X3 * W3) + (X4 * W4);
and vary the weights W1, W2, W3 and W4 and the threshold until you get a good result.
As another solution, if your inputs are really 3 numbers, you could just treat them as mathematical three dimentional vectors and calculate the size of the vector, that is, the modulus of the vector. This would be:
double Modulus = Math.Sqrt(X1*X1 + X2*X2 + X3*X3)
You can also add weights in this formula, like X1*X1*W1 and so on. Then you can compare:
if (If Math.Abs(Modulus1 - Modulus2) <= Threshold) ...
Regards,
Leonardo Muzzi
|
|
|
|
|
I particularly like the vector modulus idea, very elegant. 
But I see a problem with the two approaches you suggested: you should use dynamic weights to take into account for the difference in magnitude between the various inputs. If, for example, we have:
W1=3 ; W2=2 ; W3=1
X1=100 ; X2=300 ; X3=10
it's clear that we should increase the value of W1 in order to restrain X2 from weighing more than X1, even if its weight W2 is already less than W1. With different input sets, weights may have to be re-adjusted again. This means you would have to go through all the input sets in order to come up with proper weights before you start applying them. Even when possible, this would not be optimal.
I suggested factors of 10 because in most real world applications it's natural to have inputs whose range is in boundaries defined by factors of 10 (for example 0 to 999 etc.). Using factors of 10 will retain all of the digits for each input.
If we want to save memory (bits), I think we should switch to factors of 2 and lose the least significant bits. Switching to factors of 2 is trivial: we just left-shift the values with higher weights, while values with lower weights will drop to the right (least significant bits), and we preserve the logic I suggested with factors of 10 in terms of comparisons with thresholds.
For example, let's say that our inputs will be in the range from 0 to 999. We need 10 bits to hold that range of values, hence if we want to combine four inputs X1...X4 we need 40 bits. Now, it would sure be good to make that 32 bits, so that we can optimize memory usage and processing time, going for a nice standard 32-bit int. To do that, we just drop the two least significant bits for each input:
int ID = ((X1 >> 2) << 24) & ((X2 >> 2) << 16) & ((X3 >> 2) << 8) && (X4 >> 2);
EDIT: of course the same can be done with factors of 10, by dividing the inputs by 10, 100, etc. in order to use up less digits.
Looking forward to hear your thoughts about this.
2+2=5 for very large amounts of 2
(always loved that one hehe!)
modified on Saturday, August 8, 2009 4:12 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there! I think the dynamic weights should be used if the scenario asks for them. If he needs to always make X1 more valuable than X2, than go with dynamic weights and increase W1 as long as he needs. If the scenario asks for different results based on the input sets, that you be nice!
I think a good approach would be using dynamic weights, but vary them based on the results. That is, choose a formula (like the sum of factors, the vector modulus or any other), implement the solution, and make a test program that do as many tests as possible. Them compare the results generated with the desirable results, and vary the weights to get closer to the desirable. The test program could even vary the weights by himself.
This would be close to a small neural network solution. The program learns how to proceed based on test data. The problem with this approach is that you need a large test data so the program can "learn" enough.
About the memory usage, a very nice suggestion! I just think that maybe shrinking the more important factors (X1, X2,...) can compromise the solution, since the least significant bits of X1, for instance, could be more important than the whole X4. But again, that depends on the scenario.
By the way, I forgot to mention that the vector modulus can be used with any quantity, not just 3, just adding more factors to the formula.
Anyway, I think the author of the post has enough to work with!
Regards,
Leonardo Muzzi
|
|
|
|
|
Leonardo Muzzi wrote: Anyway, I think the author of the post has enough to work with! Smile
That's for sure hehe, the rest is just for our fun! :P
2+2=5 for very large amounts of 2
(always loved that one hehe!)
|
|
|
|
|
Leonardo Muzzi wrote: About the memory usage, a very nice suggestion! I just think that maybe shrinking the more important factors (X1, X2,...) can compromise the solution, since the least significant bits of X1, for instance, could be more important than the whole X4. But again, that depends on the scenario.
BTW I forgot to mention - you are absolutely right (depending on the scenario, of course, yep, but I think it goes for most)!
So it should be changed to something similar to:
int ID = (X1 << 22) & ((X2 >> 1) << 13) & ((X3 >> 3) << 6) & (X4 >> 4);
2+2=5 for very large amounts of 2
(always loved that one hehe!)
|
|
|
|
|
Help! I need a book that describes hash in details.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cryptographic hashing or the hashing used in hashmaps and dictionaries?
|
|
|
|
|
Or the hash in waccy baccy. 
Regards
David R
---------------------------------------------------------------
"Every program eventually becomes rococo, and then rubble." - Alan Perlis
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Data Structures and Algorithms in Java (Michael T. Goodrich and Roberto Tamassia)" explains it in some detail. But it's a huge book with only half a chapter about hashing, and the examples are in Java. I'd just google around a bit, there's plenty on the 'net about hashing
|
|
|
|
|
Hey
i have another question regarding showing Picutres in matlab. Well I took one pic of 2*2 size and selected some part of that picture. Now I need to show that selected part of 2*2 size.
how to do that ?
can anyone help me in this??
suchita
suchitamanandhar@hotmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
Hey ,
I have some problem using Matlab Masking function. Actually i have to imfreehand to draw the freehand image. I calculated the pixel of the freehand by the command getposition.
imshow('mypic.tif');
h = imfreehand();
s=getPosition(h);
Now I need to make use Mask and make the pixel of the freehand image as 1 and the rest as 0. Does anyone have any idea how to solve this?
Thanks in advance
suchita
suchitamanandhar@hotmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
this is not a pass-me-the-code site, this is a serious site with programmers helping programmers. There are some recommendations in the "How to get an answer to your question" message, you might benefit from reading it carefully.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get.
Show formatted code inside PRE tags, and give clear symptoms when describing a problem.
|
|
|
|
|
You're too kind. 
You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists.
|
|
|
|
|
I need an algorithm to check if two dates(startdate,enddate) are overlapping with another twodates(startdata,enddate)
can any one help or atleast give me the way of thinking of it becuase i need ot apply this on .NET and on
SQL
Thanks and Best Regards
|
|
|
|
|
first = the one that has the minimum start date
second = the other one
overlapping = first's end date >= second's start date (maybe you want > instead of >=)
Of course input must be valid (start date <= end date).
Eslam Afifi
|
|
|
|
|
Ok i got your point since the both intervals should have start data end date
and since these intervals should be valid intervals( startdate< enddate)
the only cond i should check is if the first interval's end date is before the second interval start date
and vise verse.
thanks
|
|
|
|
|
khalil.kamel wrote: the only cond i should check is if the first interval's end date is before the second interval start date
and vise verse.
Why vice versa!
After sorting these are the possible output
---first----------
---second----
---first----------
---second----
---first----------
---second----
All are covered by only one check (first's end >= second's start).
Eslam Afifi
|
|
|
|
|
It can also be that
-----------first-----------
---------second-----------
Just to be complete. So I think it is another small check, but in total not difficult.
Cheers
You have the thought that modern physics just relay on assumptions, that somehow depends on a smile of a cat, which isn’t there.( Albert Einstein)
|
|
|
|
|
It can also appear that the second starts first, but still overlaps the first. Or not overlapping the first.
So I would check both not just first end and second start.
Just to be complete.
Cheers
You have the thought that modern physics just relay on assumptions, that somehow depends on a smile of a cat, which isn’t there.( Albert Einstein)
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
