|
Can I override <connectionManagement> element in <system.net> section ?
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/fb6y0fyc.aspx
|
|
|
|
|
If you read the documentation in the link you provided you can see it supports add, remove and clear elements.
only two letters away from being an asset
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, I coped with this problem, I wanted to increase the limit of connections that my application can make to a single host. I just added the following text to my app.config
<system.net>
<connectionManagement>
<clear/>
<add address="*" maxconnection="20" />
</connectionManagement>
</system.net>
|
|
|
|
|
I want the source code to calculate the real time bandwidth usage of your computer. I would prefer it in .Net framework. There are lot of bandwidth calculators but I was not able to find any source code.
If anyone has any idea, do tell me.
|
|
|
|
|
Hardik Upadhyay wrote: I want the source code to calculate the real time bandwidth usage of your computer.
I'm assuming you actually mean your own computer. However your question is invalid, as nobody here is just going to hand you the source code for this sort of tool. If there is no free version available on the web then you must write your own.
|
|
|
|
|
I've written a Windows Service (VS2008, .Net 3.5) and I'm trying to install it under Windows7. The service fails to install, and I keep getting this output:
Installing assembly 'd:\DevManaged\VS2008\AllInOneDemo\AIOWindowsService\bin\debug\AIOWindowsService.exe'.
Affected parameters are:
logtoconsole =
assemblypath = d:\DevManaged\VS2008\AllInOneDemo\AIOWindowsService\bin\debug\AIOWindowsService.exe
logfile = d:\DevManaged\VS2008\AllInOneDemo\AIOWindowsService\bin\debug\AIOWindowsService.InstallLog
Installing service AIOWindowsService...
Creating EventLog source AIOWindowsService in log Application...
Rolling back assembly 'd:\DevManaged\VS2008\AllInOneDemo\AIOWindowsService\bin\debug\AIOWindowsService.exe'.
Affected parameters are:
logtoconsole =
assemblypath = d:\DevManaged\VS2008\AllInOneDemo\AIOWindowsService\bin\debug\AIOWindowsService.exe
logfile = d:\DevManaged\VS2008\AllInOneDemo\AIOWindowsService\bin\debug\AIOWindowsService.InstallLog
Restoring event log to previous state for source AIOWindowsService.
An exception occurred during the Rollback phase of the System.Diagnostics.EventLogInstaller installer.
System.Security.SecurityException: The source was not found, but some or all event logs could not be searched.
Inaccessible logs: Security.
An exception occurred during the Rollback phase of the installation. This exception will be ignored and
the rollback will continue. However, the machine might not fully revert to its initial state after the
rollback is complete.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
I have the same issue, I tried to run the console as administrator but still does't work.
I also created my own log, like was post on this article and I still have the same result.
I have Windows7 64 Bits.
|
|
|
|
|
I found a template, and started with that. It appears to install/uninstall just fine. I'll be adding stuff to it and testing the install/uninstall as I go to see what's hosing me up.
Here's a link:
http://alibaabaa.co.uk/article/350[^]
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
I have solved the problem.
Just disable UAC and run the "Visual Studio 2008 Command Prompt" as administrator, then type
installutil servicename.exe
and press enter.
The service is instaled!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
What does this mean?
Disconnected Context was detected<br />
Message: Context 0x1b9351e0' is disconnected. Releasing the interfaces from the current context (context 0x1b934f90). This may cause corruption or data loss. To avoid this problem, please ensure that all contexts/apartments stay alive until the application is completely done with the RuntimeCallableWrappers that represent COM components that live inside them.<br />
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Normally it means this[^]. Have you got any threading code in there? If so, it's possible that you've got a thread closing before cleanup has taken place.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah - it was taking too long or something.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks a lot for your helpful link.
I just happened to run into the same problem: I instantiated a COM object, and did that in a background thread during the startup of our application because the call to its "Initialize" method (which is required before other methods can be called) often took some 30 seconds. In order to keep things easy, I made the class containing that COM object a singleton (could do so because I do not need more than one object of it at a time). And when I then called a method of that COM object, it failed with exactly the error described by the OP: because the background thread in which it was created had already ended.
The bad thing here is that the supplier of the COM component is not capable of changing that low performance behavior...
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Any idea how to display animated image in datagridview columns?
|
|
|
|
|
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/forums/en-US/winformsdatacontrols/thread/4f3465b0-7126-4f86-b2e3-e5ecc336b1c8
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all
How to prevent user check on checkbox of a listview control. The listview control contains many of row items which can be selected by clicking on the checkbox. But now I want to prevent user click on the checkbox. I will check them by code in program.
And the listview control will be still active. That means user still selects one row item but just cannot click on the checkbox.
Anybody help me
thanks in advanced!
[N][Q][H]
|
|
|
|
|
Assuming this is Forms...
Maybe you could handle the ListView.ItemCheck event, and in
your handler check if the ItemCheckEventArgs.NewValue is
different from the ItemCheckEventArgs.CurrentValue, and if so,
set the ItemCheckEventArgs.NewValue to ItemCheckEventArgs.CurrentValue.
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
![Java | [Coffee]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
[N][Q][H] wrote: But now I want to prevent user click on the checkbox.
Why would you offer the user a checkbox if you don't want them to be able to use it?
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, I am trying to send message to a listview which does not allow me click to the checkbox. This is a trainning for a online game. Since character'level less than 10 I can click on the checkbox and this trainning will train my character. but if character'level greater than 10. The trainner will not allow me click to the checkbox.
In the first case(level < 10). I have tried send message to click the first row items. It works properly.
ListView_SetCheckState(hwnd,0,true);
But when my character'level reachs to 11. The list view seems be blocked(Notice that listview still be actived). In this case, the code does not work. I cannot only click to the checkbox but also using ListView_SetCheckState.
I guest that I need to send a message to update the property of listview before I can use ListView_SetCheckState. But what needs to be updated?
Plz help me!
thanks
[N][Q][H]
|
|
|
|
|
[N][Q][H] wrote: But when my character'level reachs to 11. The list view seems be blocked(Notice that listview still be actived).
I'm not sure what you are saying here; can you explain how this affects the ListView? Can you also show us the code that is affected?
|
|
|
|
|
how about e.Handled = true in eventHandler, or disabling the check box.
HTH,
|
|
|
|
|
I always have trouble debugging methods (doing a watch, for example) over methods that pass some information to another thread and wait for the result, as the other thread is keept suspended while evaluating is done.
Is there any way to mark a thread to be "invisible/unstopable" by the debugger?
|
|
|
|
|
AFAICT, there's no way to do this. Once the app breaks in the debugger, all threads stop along with it.
|
|
|
|
|
I made a big mistake. The code bellow tells everything:
private void SearchFolders(FileSystemInfo[] fsInfos)
{
foreach (FileSystemInfo fsi in fsInfos)
if (fsi is FileInfo)
try
{
ReplaceInFile((FileInfo)fsi, "textToSearch", String.Empty);
}
catch {}
else if (fsi is DirectoryInfo)
SearchFolders(((DirectoryInfo)fsi).GetFileSystemInfos());
}
private void ReplaceInFile(FileInfo fi, string searchText, string replaceText)
{
StreamReader reader = new StreamReader(fi.FullName);
string content = reader.ReadToEnd();
reader.Close();
content = Regex.Replace(content, searchText, replaceText);
StreamWriter writer = new StreamWriter(fi.FullName);
writer.Write(content);
writer.Close();
}
So i have a recursive function SearchFolders witch searches an expression in all files from a folder. The problem: well i forgot to put the condition that the search should be done only on text file. So the function just executed on every kind of file (jpeg, gif, pdf, doc, etc.). The result: the files are unreadable. Tryng to reverse the proces with someting like this had no result
private void Reverse()
{
FileInfo fi = new FileInfo(@"D:\test\test.jpg");
FileStream fs = fi.Open(FileMode.Open, FileAccess.ReadWrite, FileShare.None);
StreamReader sr = new StreamReader(fs);
string content = sr.ReadToEnd();
System.Text.UTF8Encoding utf8 = new UTF8Encoding();
byte[] bytes = utf8.GetBytes(content);
FileStream fstarget = File.Create(@"D:\test\reverse.jpg");
fstarget.Write(bytes, 0, bytes.Count);
fstarget.Close();
}
I think the files are lost but i just want to hear and another opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
cristi82gt wrote: ReplaceInFile((FileInfo)fsi, "textToSearch", String.Empty);
No, it's not reversible. What you did was replace every occurance of a certain text with nothing. Now you have no idea where to put the text back into the files. If you replaced it with a known string, that would be different, but since you used String.Empty, you've lost any hope of knowing where to put back the bytes you took out.
The bottom line is those files are hosed up beyond repair.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
