|
This is a common arrangement and the best method is to unplug the keyboard and use a mouse for the rest of the system.
The other alternative is to use a serial port barcdoe scanner which appears as a separate device and does not inject characters into the keyboard queue.
|
|
|
|
|
Suppose my process creates a new thread on a Quad-Core system. The OS decides to run the thread on the first core, for example.
My question is: will the thread keep running on the first core, no matter what, until it terminates (even if the second core becomes completely idle, while the first core is used for many threads simultaneously)? Or can the OS decide to "move" the execution of an existing thread from one core to another?
I've googled a lot but found no answer...
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Ofer Gross wrote: will the thread keep running on the first core, no matter what?
No, it will prefer to continue on the same core (cache efficiency!), but does not have to (unless you start fiddling with "thread affinities", which I do not recommend).
 Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read code that is properly formatted, adding PRE tags is the easiest way to obtain that. All Toronto weekends should be extremely wet until we get it automated in regular forums, not just QA.
|
|
|
|
|
I would say why do you want to know this, and if you did, I deffinitely wouldnt make assumptions based on such knowledge in code.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
|
|
|
|
|
Adaptec no longer supports their game bridge products and only build their driver software for the XP sp2 environment.
Running an installer in compatibility mode as an administrator does nothing on Vista-64bit
The core problem here, Vista 64-bit does not recognize the drivers.
What is the process to rewrite these drivers from a 32-bit to a 64-bit OS?
There is a HUGE cry for them on several forums.
I have the complete install CD in ISO and in ZIP format on my domain here:
http://www.illuminatilegion.com/gamebridge/[^]
|
|
|
|
|
| Unless you have the source code and a lot of experience writing driver level code then I doubt that you can do it. If you do have both these requirements then it should be a fairly simple but repetitive task to identify all the code portions that need changing. txtspeak is the realm of 9 year old children, not developers. Christian Graus
|
|
|
|
|
I'm having a hard time locating a low-profile, PCI Express video card that's using the small (x1) connector--and has a VGA connection. The more common (x16) connector won't do.
This needs to be low-profile, as the "taller" bracket at the back wouldn't fit my case.
Can anyone recommend something?
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately as you've noticed 1x cards are few, far between, and expensive.
If you have a steady hand the cheap option is to buy a cheap 16x low profile card and cut a notch in the connector after the contacts for the first lane so that it will fit in the 1x slot.
If you can't find a card with a VGA connector you can get a DVI-VGA adapter for a few bucks if your card doesn't come with one.3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Cut a notch? Seriously, Dan?
What the heck are the additional contacts for then?
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Desormeaux wrote: Cut a notch? Seriously, Dan?
Yes. Totally. You could also cut out the back of the slot so that the card hung out the back; but oopsing on a mobo is more expensive than a bottom tier GFX card. Just make sure you make your cut past the last contact of the first lane and don't cut into the main part of the PCB.
Daniel Desormeaux wrote: What the heck are the additional contacts for then?
The other 15 lanes.
PCIe devices will negotiate the number of lanes downward if they don't have full contact. At 16x card will run at 8, 4, 2, or 1x if it only has that many lanes available. Due to the limited number of lanes available on chipsets 16x physical/8 (or 4) electrical slots are common. High end cards will bottleneck severely in a 1x slot; but low end cards have much lower bandwidth requirements. In any event it's no worse than if you bought one of the highly overpriced cards that only have a 1x physical connector.3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
I like it! 
It may sound daft but this will follow PCI Express specs as long as the power and ground requirements are met.
|
|
|
|
|
| Power is provided by the short section closest to te back of the mobo. I suppose ground could be an issue; but I'd assume that since a 1x card has 9 ground connections and 8 power connections I assume it should be ok. The placement of the other grounds looks like it's done to suppress crosstalk between the datalanes. 3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Just as a follow-up:
I've ordered one of these[^]...which is probably a "cleaner" solution than what you suggested.
It is your suggestion that ultimately sent me on that search though, so thanks again. I wasn't even aware these existed. I'm not really a hardware guy. 
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Desormeaux wrote: It is your suggestion that ultimately sent me on that search though, so thanks again. I wasn't even aware these existed. I'm not really a hardware guy.
I hope you aren't planning to run with the card installed then. That riser will lift your card above the normal height. Depending on the case layout you might not even be able to seat the card with the backplate bracket attached. Even if you can you won't be able to screw it down to secure it.  3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
I only need a video card in this system long enough to install an OS and then take it back out--I don't mind running without the backplate, or have it not screwed into place. Or even having the motherboard inside the case, for that matter.
|
|
|
|
|
I think Dan's solution is the best - he is right about the grounding aragnements etc.
|
|
|
|
|
| For what Daniel actually needs the silly adapter isn't a bad option because it's only marginally more expensive than buying a card to mod. *shrug* 3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Has this actually been done? I have an 8X slot...... I want to try this.
What to cut the PCB on the video card then?
|
|
|
|
|
I've seen pictures; you'll need to look at the spec and count contacts to figure out where the gap between lanes 8 and 9 is. Check you mobo first though; a lot of the 4/8x slots have an open back so you can insert a card with more lanes than will connect without having to modify anything.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Hi guys...got a little prblum. How can I access a database from a computer(either server or client) on my windows mobile?? Is there any technology out there or this is a kindda IP Address problum and have to be tackeled by some network administraotr?? If I am on wrong platform...plz advise
|
|
|
|
|
Depends on the database engine you're trying to get to.
This stuff is already in the .NET Compact Framework and is well documented.
|
|
|
|
|
Difinitely SQl Server on my desktop computer and SQL Server CE on my device...should this be ok??
|
|
|
|
|
OK for what? Holding data. Yes, considering that's exactly what this stuff was designed for.
|
|
|
|
|
can any body plz help me how to get (R_off) of a MOSFET from its data sheet ?? for example i had (BUZ71) ..
|
|
|
|
|
Remember Ohm's law?
IDSS is 1 μA at Vds = 50V and VGS = 0 and room temp according to the datasheet.
This implies that Roff should be somewhere around 50 MΩ
This is of course not linear with neither voltage or temperature or even very exact.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
