|
Yep! it can be... its just that adding points too with a little detail might make the tooltip a little big which looks annoying to lots of people!
Still, can be thought of in compact manner somehow.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like Chris read, agreed and resolved a solution based on what we both said.
Cheers Chris! 
Though i wanted to share a little on the look of the implementation.
Might be a little smaller font-sizes would look much better on the page (this is based on normal style and smaller font stuff on the same page)
|
|
|
|
|
Sandeep Mewara wrote: Looks like Chris read, agreed and resolved a solution based on what we both said.
That was really really quick. I wish things in the real world had such quick turnarounds.
Awesome, Chris.
 Me, I'm dishonest. And a dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest.
Honestly. It's the honest ones you want to watch out for...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible if the Reputation FAQ can be modified to show your current points in the "Member Levels by Reputation Type" table at the bottom of the FAQ.
e.g. in the Author Header put members current Author points. Saves having to go back and forth to the chart to remember numbers or take a note of them.
Cheers,
|
|
|
|
|
I disagree...
daveauld wrote: Is it possible if the Reputation FAQ can be modified to show your current points in the "Member Levels by Reputation Type" table at the bottom of the FAQ.
I don't think this is a good idea. FAQ's are the places where one should see what everyone see. Answers are provided to common questions.
What you are suggesting will no longer keep that FAQ as a common page and will be like a part of 'About my reputation'! and we should have a static FAQ!
daveauld wrote: Saves having to go back and forth to the chart to remember numbers or take a note of them.
One can open two windows and have a look at them simultaneously!
|
|
|
|
|
Who says a FAQ cannot be dynamic? That is bollocks, but you are entitled to you opinion as am I.
Why inconvenience the user with having 2 windows, when you have space and couple of lines of extras code to get the system to do the work for you?
Also, i wonder what the Points Needed column will be used for in the future? maybe it is for something dynamic....only time will tell.Dave
Don't forget to rate messages!Find Me On: Web| Facebook| Twitter| LinkedInWaving? dave.m.auld[at]googlewave.com
modified on Saturday, March 13, 2010 7:02 AM
|
|
|
|
|
daveauld wrote: but you are entitled to you opinion as am I.
Right! That was just my opinion, nothing more!
daveauld wrote: Also, i wonder what the Points Needed column will be used for in the future? maybe it is for something dynamic....only time will tell
Yep. Lets see.
|
|
|
|
|
I think it's a great idea, since the the FAQ is on a separate page from your actual reputation score.
Just put the member's current score for each category in the table header that explains that category..45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
| I'm showing these values in your profile now. cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Cheers Chris, but i think this reply should have been in the Thread from Abhinav above this one here[^], as it relates to that question, not this one.
This thread was about showing these valves in the Rep Faq, in the lower table header rows so you can easily see your current rep score vs the requirements for each level for each category.
Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry - my (obtuse) answer was meant to address this issue. Essentially "I don't feel that FAQ should list your entries, though I am considered having the entries show how far you have to go until the next level. In the meantime I'm showing your actual numeric values in your profile".
I can see my abbreviated version may not have conveyed the full meaning.cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Cheers!
Issue of showing a dynamic FAQ resolved
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why do they use Web Development forum, inspite CP has a Job board... 
|
|
|
|
|
| I've told this guy a number of times to go away or not abuse the forums, but never get a reply. Probably time he was booted into touch. txtspeak is the realm of 9 year old children, not developers. Christian Graus
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks.
Feel free to mark their posts to be removed, and for the Quick Answers spam delete or edit into oblivion. Down vote 'em first, of course, so their reputation reflects their quality of character.
That really annoys me.cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I just noticed that I can no longer edit the questions in quick answers.
Have the rules changed or what?
|
|
|
|
|
Me too. I can no more edit/update questions or answers.  modified on Saturday, March 13, 2010 5:12 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Same here. Moreover, I see i have different reputation points at different posts (they are posted in an interval of less than half an hour).
I have noticed the same thing for Rod Kemp as well.Computer programming is an extraordinarily precise activity, be precise.
|
|
|
|
|
Look at you member profile.
You will see the new reputation system has kicked in for each of the levels. I wondered the same thing after trying to edit someones cr@p in the QA's and noticed my edit rights gone.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes we do have different reputation types from today...
It's just, I found for me, editing questions if needed, updating them was useful while replying them.
But it looks like, probably we need to be high reputed organizer's now!
For now, we cannot do unless CP wants us to...
|
|
|
|
|
It was/is silver or above, but what does that mean with the per category levels?
Do you have to be silver or above for all levels now to edit a question?
In which case how would someone get thier editor level up to silver?
|
|
|
|
|
Organizer Editors i believe...modified on Saturday, March 13, 2010 7:37 AM
modified on Saturday, March 13, 2010 7:38 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Why Organiser?
I didn't see that mentioned anywhere.
I would have thought Authority would have been a better category, Organiser just means you have up and down voted posts/articles not really an indicator of someones ability to edit a question.
|
|
|
|
|
Oops! I just checked the chart again... looks like its Editor reputation that drives it.
Though i too agree, Authority too must be a part of it.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
