|
This member[^] is making stupid racist remarks.
I downvoted his remark and then I thought: Better vote to remove it as well.
But lo and behold: Once you have voted (even if you vote 1), the "Vote to remove" link disappears. Surely that must be a mistake?
/Johnny J.
|
|
|
|
|
Not only that, but the ability to change your vote disappears... until you refresh the page, at which point you may change your vote. I tested with your message by voting it a 3. When I refreshed the page, I was able to vote again. I think this is more a UI design choice than a clear example of a bug (unless the behavior your observed is different than what I described). Would be nice, though, if a page refresh wasn't required.
|
|
|
|
|
Let's test: Try changing your 3 vote to a 5... 
|
|
|
|
|
I changed it to a 4. 
|
|
|
|
|
Allowing re-voting without a page refresh is on our TODO.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
When I vote 5 on a message in the Lounge and refresh the page, it turns red (depending on the noise tolerance and other existing votes). Would be nice if it changed color without me refreshing the page.
|
|
|
|
|
When I look at the browser title (i.e., the title displayed in the browser window title bar) for this tip/trick, I see "[Solved]" prefixed to the rest of the title. Probably another case of treating a tip/trick like a quick answer question.
|
|
|
|
|
Good spot! I've been revisiting some of this over the weekend looking at Post/Send using SynchronizationContext instead (gets rid of the need for the InvokeRequired check by the way - more testing and digging into the source to see what happens needed) and have been to that page many times but never spotted that!
DaveIf this helped, please vote & accept answer!
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier.
Please take your VB.NET out of our nice case sensitive forum.(Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
|
|
|
|
|
Good catch. I'll have this fixed today.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
for making, this, my 18,000th comment.
|
|
|
|
|
From this, my 19,416th comment.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
Which is extremely interesting as its number is divisible by 809.
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: Which is extremely interesting as its number is divisible by 809.
19.261904761904761904761904761905
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
Once again I forgot what the question was.
|
|
|
|
|
What's 809 divided by 42?
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
I'm well aware of the universal answer, as I said I'm still looking for the universal question.
|
|
|
|
|
Most numbers are divisible by 809. Even more interesting is that it is evenly divisible by 809! 
|
|
|
|
|
aspdotnetdev wrote: Most
intriguing
|
|
|
|
|
Whether or not zero is divisible by anything is up for debate. Dividing zero would be like ripping the space between two quarks into 50 pieces.
|
|
|
|
|
you have a strange view on things, zero is the one number that is divisible by (almost?) everything, even evenly. No ripping required.
|
|
|
|
|
There may be such a thing as not zero, but there is no such thing as zero! Show me zero eggs and then maybe I'll believe that zero exists.
Luc Pattyn wrote: zero is the one number that is divisible by (almost?) everything
Everything except zero. 
|
|
|
|
|
aspdotnetdev wrote:
Most numbers are divisible by 809. [...]
Dividing zero would be like ripping the space between two quarks into 50 pieces.
Some scientists among us (including mathematicians) would disagree
|
|
|
|
|
Moak wrote: Some scientists among us would disagree
Probably because they watch too much Star Trek.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks mate.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Java | [Coffee]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)
