|
LOL. Now that was funny. 
Chris Meech
I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]
posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]
|
|
|
|
|
Groan!
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Sean,
I've surfed through his profile, Though his article is being delated But his article count says that he has 1 article. Is that BUG or CP displays count of all the article regardless of status of the same.
Regards,
Hiren.
Microsoft Dynamics CRM
"A SQL query goes into a bar, walks up to two tables and asks, "Can I join you?", "yes naturally""
|
|
|
|
|
i am using search string in jquery grid on below the article
before give the demo of string search in jquery grid, i want give the basic concept of scripting languageh so that i have taken refrence
from that site
Regards
Shashank Singh
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Sean
i am using search string in jquery grid on below the article
before give the demo of string search in jquery grid, i want give the basic concept of scripting languageh so that i have taken refrence
from that site
Regards
Shashank Singh
|
|
|
|
|
That's all very well, but you can't go and use somebody else's text without at least referring to them and giving them the credit. That's just underhanded.
|
|
|
|
|
ShashankSinghThakur wrote: i want give the basic concept of scripting languageh so that i have taken refrence
from that site
That's normally considered to be plagiarism. In fact in most cases it's not even enough to merely put a reference to the source, you may actually have to get explicit permission before you can reproduce portions of a copyrighted article.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Shashank,
Sometimes it is better to offer a link. So in your article you could have put "for more information on basic scripting language, see this article" and then a link to the original source.
Other times a long quote works best. Typically these are full paragraphs that are word for word entries from other sources that are placed in quotations with a reference link to the site directly afterwards. However, the bulk of the article shouldn't be a series of long quotes and then your material.
Would you be interested in writing a Tips & Tricks post that uses your "second quick search in a grid?" A little explanation of how your quick search works, as well as what makes it unique from other searches would be well received. I'd be happy to look at a rough draft if you were interested or had further questions. You can reach me at submit[at]codeproject.com
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I do get the email as soon as someone comments, but only when the article is new.
No email is sent by CP system after few days/weeks of article publishing - when someone comments on the article (or replies to a comment).
Kindly look into it.
|
|
|
|
|
There's no difference in the code whether it's a new or old article. Have you checked your spam filter and added us to your white list?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Have you checked your spam filter and added us to your white list?
Well, the notification mails are sent from same email address, right? So, it can't go to spam folder selectively. Yes, I have checked. I do check the Junk mails too. I don't believe it is the cause.
Try commenting on any of my old articles, and I am sure I wont get mail.
Try this[^] for example, for which I did not get ANY email after "break point from debugger into debugge, how?" comment that was made on 30 Jan '10. 
|
|
|
|
|
I've made a comment. Let me know if it came through.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I have received "test" message for the comment you made.
But, why would I lie? 
To make my assertion true, check out most of good articles of anyone. The late comments received do not get replies from the author. The reason is same, the author does not get the notification mail for those delayed comments.
|
|
|
|
|
I have the whole link coloring gone wrong thingy again.
All the users (except the one's with a specific color) are a weird shade of purple.
And some of the other links as well (the new message link for example)
|
|
|
|
|
Try Cntrl+F5...
We had this issue yesterday and then Chris fixed it back.
|
|
|
|
|
ctrl+F5'd like hell.
Closed browser and all, reloaded 10+ times
No differances.
(It's the first thing I try when seeing something like this )
|
|
|
|
|
Really? Which browser?
I don't see it at all. I had it yesterday [^] though.
|
|
|
|
|
Chrome 7 (what else  )
Luc Pattyn wrote: I don't see it at all. I had it yesterday [^] though.
Yeah I know that's why I said 'is back'
I didn't have it yesterday tho, I guess the hamsters are picking one out every day to mess with?
|
|
|
|
|
you could have said back again. And next time it will be back once more.
Chrome 7 is known for its aggressive caching, I'm not surprised it still holds stale CSS code notwithstanding some CTRL/F5 (which I'm afraid do apply to the page you load, not necessarily their dependencies). Another good reason to stick with FF...
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: you could have said back again. And next time it will be back once more.
Details ...
I'm sticking with chrome, don't kn ow why but never really liked FF (just one of those strange things I got )
Can't test it at home tho since everything looks fine here, but if I didn't have it yesterday and no change happened to the site shouldn't caching mean I don't have it today? (I'm no expert here so... )
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know the details of their caching mechanisms, so anything is possible AFAICT. Don't worry, it will get better in the end.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not worried
As soon as Chris uses that #4 whip I'm sure the hamsters will see it my way 
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe you should update to Chrome 8, now that it has been available for a few days 
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Deketelaere wrote: It's the first thing I try when seeing something like this
Sure you do, but couldn't stop myself saying that! 
As Luc already said, Chrome might be caching and not reloading though you are forcing it to. In FF3.6 & IE8, they are looking fine.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually I'm uncolouring some links that I used to force to blue (unvisited) and am letting them revert to their standard state (blue = unvisited, purple = visited).
If it really bothers you then I'm happy to tweak, but I do feel it's useful to allow certain links to change when they have been visited.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
