|
If you could do me another favor, could you please delete all the messages there? I want to start fresh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like the message has been removed (I never got a chance to see it). And it looks like this member is actually contributing to Code Project. Perhaps he just needs some votes to correct his actions whenever he posts junk.
By the way, members can now be reported via their member page (it's a new feature).
Fixign now. | But who's fixing the fixign? |
|
|
|
|
|
look at reply to article.
See here[^]
I voted to remove message as well.
--
You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a specialist.
|
|
|
|
|
Use the report button on the member's homepage.
The best things in life are not things.
|
|
|
|
|
 Many thanks.
--
You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a specialist.
|
|
|
|
|
I found the high handedness of deleting the article from the author totally repulsive.
If the article needs more information come up with ways to turn the article back to review mode and remove from public view.
We are in the world of technology where its not possible for anyone to understand leave alone review the thoughts of someone.
|
|
|
|
|
What you are saying does not make much sense. Are you suggesting that articles get deleted because their topic depth was too advanced? 
|
|
|
|
|
I suspect that depth here refers to lack of depth.
|
|
|
|
|
Anton Pious Alfred wrote: I found the high handedness of deleting the article from the author totally
repulsive
Articles are not removed by the Code Project staff. They are removed based on votes from the community.
Anton Pious Alfred wrote: We are in the world of technology where its not possible for anyone to
understand leave alone review the thoughts of someone.
Errm. That's complete bollocks. It's fairly easy to review the thoughts of someone when they are committed to the public domain.
I agree that articles can be removed too quickly - that's why I'm a Code Project mentor; I'm here to offer advice to authors who have articles that don't quite live up to the highest standard and, unfortunately, some articles are removed before a mentor has a chance to offer advice. If the author chooses to move their article back to the composing status, then it should not be removed.
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a specific article you are talking about, and do you mean how articles can be closed by members who vote it as not suitable for publishing?
If this is the case then authors always have the ability to re-open their article simply by editing it, which will place it back in the queue of pending articles and it will then be given a fresh chance of being approved.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Is this your idea of being on holiday?
|
|
|
|
|
Can someone please point me to the embarrassed cough emoticon?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Busted. 
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Can someone please point me to the embarrassed cough emoticon?
That emoticon doesn't work Chris. I thought you knew that. 
--
You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a specialist.
|
|
|
|
|
I had posted an article "View, View Controller, Model Controller, Model (VVCMCM) Pattern" on Sunday, 14 November, 2010
The article had two comments
John Simmons / outlaw programmer has posted a new comment at "[Article]: View, View Controller, Model Controller, Model (VVCMCM) Pattern":
You created half a page to describe something that takes a whole book.
Richard MacCutchan has posted a new comment at "[Article]: View, View Controller, Model Controller, Model (VVCMCM) Pattern":
You have ignored what many people would consider the key issues of your pattern, namely the interface between server and client. You also failed to add any detail of how your code is supposed to work.
You may also find that this issue has been addressed by the MVVM pattern, which you should investigate.
After which it was deleted from
"webmaster@codeproject.com"
Thanks very much for your contribution to The Code Project. However, your article 'View, View Controller, Model Controller, Model (VVCMCM) Pattern' in the Design and Architecture section at
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/architecture/VVCMCM.aspx
has been deleted because it is of insufficient quality as judged by our readers and editors.
All that was need is to put it back into review, now I am not able to see even the deleted article under my articles.
I mean why is that we are trying to make it understandable by everyone in the community. This is technology and its always going to be difficult to grasp concepts till a maturity level is reached. Please create sections where such articles can go.
Richard MacCutchan comments clearly show's he completely did not understand the article. While the MVVM partern is still Windows Application Centric which doesn't understand that the View Can't be rendered by a technology that is present in the server side.
Do not delete articles unless it being plagiarized.
|
|
|
|
|
In this case it was an editor who deleted the article.
I'll ask Sean re-review the article and, if appropriate, to undelete the article and mark it as a "Beginner" article.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
H-o-l-i-d-a-y.
Remember?
Or are you here to implement the :embarrassedcough: emoticon? 
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
|
|
|
|
|
I think Chris is using the Embarassed, Embarassed Cough, Embarassed Cough, Embarassed (EECECE) Pattern.
|
|
|
|
|
Errm. Sorry to be pedantic here, but you're brooking onto territory I'm very familiar with here, but MVVM is not Windows Application Specific. It's merely the recognised Microsoft terminology to describe a pattern that is known as the Model View Passive Presenter pattern. The reason that it's so popular right now with MS types is that WPF (and later Silverlight) provide excellent binding facilities.
This pattern has been embraced and developed as an ASP.NET facilitator as well. There's an excellent article here on Code Project demonstrating the use of MVVM in ASP.NET.
|
|
|
|
|
On my profile page my total points currently shows as being exactly 3,500 (it won't be after i post this message ). Anyway, that number seems correct but the coloured block with my total in the top right corner of my screen next to my username shows '3.6K' exactly 100 too much. This has also happened when I had a lower total namely when I had between 3400 and 3450 it still showed 3.5K as my total, again rounded in the wrong direction or 100 too much? Seems like a fairly bad bug to me. Anyone else getting this?
Ed 
|
|
|
|
|
Rounding up perhaps?
--
You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a specialist.
|
|
|
|
|
Well if it is it really shouldn't be 3500 is nothing like 3.6K
|
|
|
|
|
EdMan196 wrote: 3500 is nothing like 3.6K
I agree but there isn't much we can do about it.
BTW...why do you keep sticking your tongue out on this thread? Just curious.
--
You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a specialist.
|
|
|
|
|
Well where I come from (London, UK) and so far as I know, is meant to show something was sarcasm or a bit dumb/pointless/obvious so that's why I used it.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
