|
This issue should be fixed now.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, someone posted some HTML in the .NET Framework forum that screwed up the page...again.
|
|
|
|
|
It might be this user's[^] signature perhaps. His response to a question is the final one that I see until I open up his post. Everything else then shows up really odd as part of his post. 
Chris Meech
I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]
posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]
|
|
|
|
|
They had used '<' in the message with 'Use HTML in this post' checked.
|
|
|
|
|
Planning to allow saving more than 5 "interest" filters in the future? Considering the large number of filter selections there already are, makes sense to allow users to save more than 5 filters when looking through Q&A.
|
|
|
|
|
The most useful feature (for me) of the Bookmarks feature would be the ability sort my list of bookmarks in reverse chrono order (i.e. most recently bookmarked first). This would make the feature infinitely (or at least 17.5492E+892301 times) more useful.
Thanks,
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, that would explain it! It was the author's error in this[^] post.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
The original link (http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/list_articles.asp?userid=441940) now redirects correctly.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is what I got when I tried to 5 vote a post today. I am signed in and did not have problem voting before. How did I become "uncomfirmed"?
|
|
|
|
|
If you click on the link that's presented then the "confirm" page explains it. Essentially, email addresses go stale and we are doing our best to
a) ensure we don't send emails to those who are no longer interested or active, and
b) make it harder and more annoying to create sock puppets solely for the point of downvoting.
We have also restricted access to the Soapbox and backroom [so that write access is only available] to those with confirmed emails. We don't police those forums so there must be a level of personal accountability.
[Edit: added clarification]
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
modified on Saturday, June 4, 2011 8:41 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks.
P.S. Trying vote 5 on your reply, got "You must have a confirmed email address to vote". 
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: We have also restricted access to the Soapbox and backroom to those with confirmed emails.
Restricted access for those with confirmed emails. WTF???
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry - I'm not sure which part of that is confusing.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
No it does not mean "restricted access", it means that access is restricted to only members with confirmed email. Stupid English language 
The best things in life are not things.
|
|
|
|
|
I will fix the wording.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
It does make sense, but I guess if English is not your first language then the lack of correct stress could garble it.
The best things in life are not things.
|
|
|
|
|
Reading it as "Access to what ever is restricted to users with a confirmed whatchamacallit" made clear to me where my problem in understanding the original phrasing correctly was. The first "to" after restricted sort of camouflaged the verb form "to restrict smth. to smth."[^].
Thanks for clearing that up! 
|
|
|
|
|
Natural languages often are ambiguous. 'Twas not in your case I just got confused by the first "to" after the verb restricted.
My favorite in ambiguity: "He saw that gasoline can explode."
Cheers!
|
|
|
|
|
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana!
The best things in life are not things.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana!
I have to remember that one! 
|
|
|
|
|
When the stars image is shown on a background other than white (like for an accepted answer), you can still see the white background on the stars image. Shouldn't the background be transparent?
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
The stars are done with 2 layers. The first is a solid block of colour, the second is a solid mask with star shapes cut out. The solid block of colour is rectangular and it's width is based on the rating. The area of the top mask outside the stars blocks off all this backing colour and just allows the colour to come through the transparent cutouts for the stars.
A way to get the background to fill the area around the stars is to have two images of stars, one filled, one empty, and show part of the filled image on the left, part of the empty on the right, with both images being transparent outside the stars, thus letting the background through.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
