|
Wonde Tadesse
MCTS
|
|
|
|
|
Inspired by Mike Hankey's post about the EasyUS back up tool I would like to mention another free for home use tool EasyUs Partition Master[^].
|
|
|
|
|
I got pissed off at Acronis because it failed to allow me to clone my primary drive
so I downloaded EaseUS[^] and it worked like a charm. Haven't tried to do backup
yet but if it's as easy as the clone I'd say it'd be a good tool to add to your box.
Sects Therapy
|
|
|
|
|
Acronis recently pissed me off when it failed to open an archive made with an earlier version... 
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah I don't know where there heads at, they used to be good but with each
new version it seems to progressively be getting worse. Although some of the
newer features is the reason I keep upgrading.
This sig, like my mind intentionally left blank.
|
|
|
|
|
They've also turned into licensing nazis... Something else to piss me off about... Never understood why people would give a hard time about installing the product on multiple machines if I've already paid for it. They actually told me I wasn't allowed to install the product on an external drive to clone multiple computers (to back them up).
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah screw em like I said they got the last penny out of me that they are going to get.
This sig, like my mind intentionally left blank.
|
|
|
|
|
Just loaded it today, and am trying the backup (since the backup software I normally use only installs with my old NAS - now bricked for the last time )
Only complaint (other than trivia vie labels that disappear under the textbox they are related to) is the progress indicator. Full backup, first time, estimated time remaining 3m 22s. Half an hour later, still 3m 22s, but the progress bar is up to 1/4.
We shall see!
[edit]
After 45 minutes it updated the time remaining to 1hr 58m and it is counting down.
[/edit]
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
modified 24-Nov-11 7:09am.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Full backup, first time, estimated time remaining 3m 22s. Half an hour later, still 3m 22s, but the progress bar is up to 1/4.
We shall see!
Am interested in how the backup goes, am and will probably continue using Acronis for that.
It's saved my butt a couple of times so I trust it.
I'm not totally useless, I can be used as a bad example.
|
|
|
|
|
Frankly? Not that impressed so far. The backup I asked for yesterday was only ~40Gb, so I would expect an hour, maybe two (in this case it is going to a USB2 external drive, so data transfer rates shouldn't be a problem, even if they would be slower than my Gigabit LAN / NAS combination was).
When the Time remaining hit 12 hours after 4 hours work (and that slugging the whole PC out) it got killed, and I am re-trying with a smaller dataset - 500Mb. The PC doesn't seem as slugged , but the time is still on the "bad" side of useful: 5 mins elapsed, and still 2 mins to go. Allegedly.
I suspect this one is a case of "you get what you pay for".
Ok - 8 mins for 500 Mb, compressed to 385Mb.
Some nice bits - you can enter the backup from Explorer, and have a good rummage around - you don't need to learn a new interface for restoring a single file, just grab and drop.
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks if the time comes I will cross this one off my list for backup.
I'm not totally useless, I can be used as a bad example.
|
|
|
|
|
I used Acronis True Image 2010 for several years, then tried to upgrade to 2011 and found out that backing up to network mapped drives didn't work. Never could get it to work, so I skipped it.
Bought 2012 4 weeks ago, still can't get it work properly, spent hours on chat with their support. Asked for a refund, get more responses that they want to make it work.
The product is a no-go. Don't waste your time or money on the 2012 version unless you're doing simple local drive backups.
Ralph Moses
|
|
|
|
|
rjmoses wrote: The product is a no-go. Don't waste your time or money on the 2012 version unless you're doing simple local drive backups.
Yeah that was my thinking also. I upgrades to 2011 about 3 months ago and wished I would have saved my money
now.
Don't argue with an idiot; people watching may not be able to tell the difference.
|
|
|
|
|
Wonde Tadesse
MCTS
|
|
|
|
|
I'm trying to configure ccnet.config file with a range of parameters for force build option but the Validator.exe program says: "Unable to load array item 'rangeParameter' - Cannot convert from type System.String to ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Remote.Parameters.ParameterBase for object with value:"The type of build to perform.CleanBuildBuild". I can't find the way and it makes me nervous.....
Thanks a lot and best regards!!!.
this is the project's section:
<project name="$(PruebaApplicationProject1)" >
<workingDirectory>$(DriveCheckOut)$(WorkingMainDir)</workingDirectory>
<artifactDirectory>$(DriveCheckOut)$(WorkingMainDir)$(PruebaApplicationProject1) $(ArtifactDirectory)</artifactDirectory>
<category>Categoria 1</category>
<webURL>$(ServerName1)$(WorkingMainDir)$(PruebaApplicationProject1)$(ArtifactDirectory)$(ReportName)</webURL>
<labeller type="defaultlabeller">
<initialBuildLabel>1</initialBuildLabel>
<prefix>Project1-1-</prefix>
<incrementOnFailure>true</incrementOnFailure>
<labelFormat>00000</labelFormat>
</labeller>
<modificationDelaySeconds>1800</modificationDelaySeconds>
<maxSourceControlRetries>5</maxSourceControlRetries>
<initialState>Stopped</initialState>
<startupMode>UseLastState</startupMode>
<triggers>
<intervalTrigger name="continuous" seconds="600" buildCondition="ForceBuild" initialSeconds="600" />
<parameterTrigger>
<parameters>
<namedValue name="Type" value="Build"/>
</parameters >
</parameterTrigger>
</triggers>
<tasks>
<nant>
<executable>$(NAntDirectory)nant.exe</executable>
<baseDirectory>$(WorkingMainDir)$(PruebaApplicationProject1)\</baseDirectory>
<buildFile>$(PruebaApplicationProject1)$(ExtentionBuildFile)</buildFile>
<buildArgs>-listener:CCNetListener,CCNetListener</buildArgs>
<buildTimeoutSeconds>1200</buildTimeoutSeconds>
<dynamicValues>
<directValue parameter="Type" property="targetList.target[0]" >
<default>Build</default>
</directValue>
</dynamicValues>
</nant>
</tasks>
<publishers>
<statistics />
<xmllogger logDir="$(DriveCheckOut)$(WorkingMainDir)$(PruebaApplicationProject1)$(ArtifactDirectory)" />
</publishers>
<parameters>
<rangeParameter name="Type">
<description>The type of build to perform.</description>
<allowedValues>
<value>Clean</value>
<value>Build</value>
</allowedValues>
<default>Build</default>
</rangeParameter>
</parameters>
</project>
|
|
|
|
|
Why is this in the Free Tools forum?
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: Why is this in the Free Tools forum?
Why do birds sing?
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done.
Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H
OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett
|
|
|
|
|
Nagy Vilmos wrote: Why do birds sing?
Because they do know the words.
Why are you following me? 
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
i have problem in it and error occur invalid parameter.
|
|
|
|
|
MahamEman20 wrote: i have problem in it and error occur invalid parameter.
What?
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
He's a spammer. Remove the message and the user.
|
|
|
|
|
Done; and so he should be.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a tool to keep track of user objects consumed by UI controls for a process ?
I want to know the User objects/GDI objects consumed by different UI controls available within a single process.
Please help.
|
|
|
|
|
Windows TaskManager can show that for the whole process: When you are on the Processes tab, select the desired columns from the view menu.
Even Process Explorer won't differentiate for single UI controls.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Hiller, Thanks for your reply.
But, Taskmanager can only show user Objects consumed by a single process.
But it did not give the control level details about which controls consumed how many user objects within that process.
I want to know - is there any tool available by which i can get the control level details also for a process about which control consumed how many user objects.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
