|
You still didn't state your problem...
[Note: I didn't downvote, but if you keep posting code with no clear problem statement, expect more downvotes.]
|
|
|
|
|
[Note: I did 1 vote]
You have showed precisely 3/5ths & 5/8ths of nothing new in this post. There IS NOT enough information for any kind of useful (in the sense of this particular problem) response.
Problems with your posts include (though are not limited to):
1) Failure to use code tags (this time)
2) Repetition of the same useless snippet of code (this time)
3) A failure to actually state what the problem is (both times)
4) The changing to a different username for the repost (this time)
5) Nothing you've showed has anything to do with the DXF format, even if this is the type of file you're trying to process, there is nothing related to DXFs in any way. (both times)
You do realize that we've got no idea of what you're trying to do, save for the mention of DXFs in the subject line? You've not showed any code that can fail, with the possible exception of the fclose - though you don't check the return value, nor will an attempt to close an invalid file result in a crash.
(Assuming your primary language is indeed english) This is an example of sloppiness and lazy questioning at close to its peak.
Wait a minute - even if it's not, you still (presumably) have access to the same Google Translate pages that we do. Even if the grammar may become a little battered in the process of automatic translation, there is still no actual information in your posts.
I'd be happy to change that 1 back into something a little more pleasant, should you have the urge to edit the last post such that it resembles a serious question. 
But if that doesn't happen, it's remains merely 'noise'.
|
|
|
|
|
I can't believe you took the time to write all that...
[I accidentally bookmarked your post last night, fat fingers+small mobile screen= pushing wrong links].
|
|
|
|
|
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I am guessing that what you are saying here is that you have have no idea how to write the rest of the program and you think CP members are going to do it for you.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
It seems your code is a small random snip which may or may not be relevant. You did not describe any compiler or runtime issues you have. No one can help you if you don't give them something to work with.
Regards, AT
Cogito ergo sum
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is my first time working with c++ and SQL Server.
Well I figured out how to connect to a SQL Server using the native 10.0 SQLCLI10. I can connect to the server, run my SQL Command and get back a rowset with columns now.
But for the life of me, some things are fuzzy. I now believe that all data returned are BYTES stored in a buffer pointer. So I run a small command to get back 1 row and 1 column, but I can't figure out how what to do with the BYTE response. I want to just get a WCHAR value, check it and be on my way.
SELECT CASE WHEN db_id('NASE') IS NOT NULL THEN 'TRUE' ELSE 'FALSE' END
buffer = new BYTE[ prgInfo[0].ulColumnSize + 3 ];
ULONG valbufferlen = ( ULONG ) prgInfo[0].ulColumnSize;
memset( buffer, 0, prgInfo[0].ulColumnSize + 3 );
hr = pIRowset->QueryInterface( IID_IAccessor, ( void ** ) &pIAccessor );
hr = pIAccessor->CreateAccessor( DBACCESSOR_ROWDATA, 1, DBBindings, prgInfo[0].ulColumnSize, &hAccessor, DBBindStatus );
while( DB_S_ENDOFROWSET != pIRowset->GetNextRows( NULL, 0, 1, &cRowsObtained, &prghRows ) ) {
hr = pIRowset->GetData( rghRows, hAccessor, buffer );
for ( ULONG i = 0, j = 0 ; i < valbufferlen ; i++, j+=2 ) {
}
pIRowset->ReleaseRows(1, prghRows, NULL, NULL, NULL);
}
|
|
|
|
|
I just copied the bytes to chars and did a compare, the buffer looked like is was already null terminated. Well it's a start at least, until I get to more complex return results.
I just got a taste of what SQL Server really is, didn't know asp.net masked and wrapped the extreme complexities of the product to this degree, to make it way easier to talk to. I think I just a short lesson in pointers as well.
if (prgInfo[0].wType == DBTYPE_STR) {
char *szDatabaseStatus = new char[valbufferlen];
for ( ULONG i = 0; i < valbufferlen ; i++ ) {
szDatabaseStatus[i] = buffer[i];
}
int iCompare = stricmp(szDatabaseStatus, "TRUE");
if (iCompare == 0)
bResult = TRUE;
delete [] szDatabaseStatus;
}
|
|
|
|
|
Why are you torturing yourself like this? (Using OleDB).
Why not use ADO to access the SQL server DB?
|
|
|
|
|
I had a really bad experience with Microsoft and ADO in 2001.
I starting to understand it now, and figured out I can assign a value like LPWSTR to the return value.
For right now, I only need to do 5 things with SQL, Create Database, user, assign permissions, and create and populate the tables.
When this progrmam is finished, I'm going to look into MFC.
|
|
|
|
|
I understand. I started developing SQL DB apps back in 2002, ended up using ADO and C++. I equally hated and loved it.
FYI MFC is not needed to use ADO in C++.
Is it an option for you to use .NET? All this SQL DB stuff if SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO much easier in C# and .NET.
|
|
|
|
|
I wrote a eCommerce program in asp.net, that uses server control dll's. I've been trying to sell the program, but I need more users. I have a 99% failure rate on installation. So I wrote a Setup Wizard, one click app in asp.net, but when I added support for Vista and 7, it bombs on XP. Plus it's not 100% reliable. It's also a pain in the ** to deploy consistently.
So I decided to write a new setup wizard, this time in C++. I fired up my VS2010, and choose win32 project, not really knowing what it was. Now I almost have all the functionality I had before, almost done, and so far so good. It's works on XP', Vista and 7 in X86.
A long time ago, I wrote a eCommerce program in classic asp, and used ado for the database. Once a month the server would lock up, and not be able to communicate to the database server. I spent a week hunting down the issue, and it was the ado module, crashing from a 3Com hardware driver. There was no support with the issue, and felt helpless. My store was down for a week, and at any given moment in time, it could crash.
|
|
|
|
|
It sounds like a hardware problem.
Swapping your network card out (diff brand), may have solved all of your headaches.
I understand that you're gun shy now, but it has been a decade since you had that trouble with the 3Com Drivers.
|
|
|
|
|
I took me a month to figure out that the 3Com 3C 909 I think, a dual port 10/100 ethernet card was the problem, so I switched to Intel and Broadcom Chipset cards since them. Back then I had no idea how a hardware driver could only interfere with just talking to the MySQL Server, which was on board, and everything else still worked fine including the web server. So I concluded that the OBDC was evil, and stayed away from it since.
Long story short, I ended up going open source, LAMP, and regretted that as well, because I spent more time fixing issues with the programs, then actually writing programs. Found it was cheaper to just buy programs that work, and let someone else fix them.
Back to ODBC, I hear it's officially dead now. I think to the best of my knowledge!, like Ethernet, OLEDB has become the standard now, and ODBC was like token-ring, good idea, but lost out in the end. I may be wrong, just my opinion.
Oh, I'm still using that 3Com card in a CentOS Linux Server right now. LOL!
I know I was talking about ADO in the last post, I still stay away from both of them.
|
|
|
|
|
I ran into a number of cards that had bad drivers back in the day.
The issue was in persistent connections. There were protocol stack bugs.
You wouldn't see it on web servers, especially then, because connections aren't persistent.
I still use ODBC. It's not dead. The OleDB layer rests on top of it.
|
|
|
|
|
I thought it was the other way around. I don't remember anymore, last week was the first time in 5 years that I investigated it again. I'll look into ODBC again later in the month, but if the SQLCLIN10 works out for me, then I'll just stick with it. I kind of like it, It's an eye opener into how the whole process works.
|
|
|
|
|
I just read an article where Microsoft has announced the end of oledb, and will support ODBC only in future releases of SQL Server starting with 2012. I remember when they announced the end of Visual Basic to.
So I better start looking for ODBC examples, and perhaps rewrite my stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a program that allows me to do some processing from menu resource in my program and I would like to access it from a dialog box. Currently, the member function autoplane() is defined in my WinSTMView class and I would like to member function to be accessed in ScanAcq Class. I tried to accomplish this by doing the following:
void CDlg_ScanAcq::OnBnClickedScanProcess()
{
OnPlaceData();
CWinSTMView *pView;
pView->OnImageAutoPlane();
}
Any suggestions on what I am doing wrong? I have tried to load the all the correct header files.
[modified]
This is repeated in the comments, but it will also help to give more information about what I am trying to solve...so I will paste it here as well.
The comment, "This part doesn't work", was meant to direct the attention away from the first call to OnPlaceData() to the lines of code that were causing problems. All I want to happen is for the Autoplane() member that is defined in the view part of the MDI (I think there are three parts in MDI, the view, the doc, and the app) to be successfully called from a button I placed on a different dialog box. To do this I tried to create an pointer of the view class type and call the member. It compiles fine, but in runtime the program crashes.
[/modified]
modified 30-Nov-11 14:24pm.
|
|
|
|
|
You can't just declare a pointer to <code>CWinSTMView</code> and then call a method on it. Either use <code>new</code> or just declare the class: <code>CWinSTMView View</code> then call <code>View.OnImageAutoPlate()</code>
|
|
|
|
|
My pointer to nothing doesn't work... 
 
|
|
|
|
|
I tried what you suggested, but I get the error message that CWinSTMView::CWinSTMView() is inaccessible.
|
|
|
|
|
When do you get this error? Is the constructor of this view public?
|
|
|
|
|
No, the constructor is not public. It is protected and I was unsure if just changing it to public was the best way to solve the problem. So, I thought I would ask if it was good programming practice in my efforts to understand MFC programming.
|
|
|
|
|
If it's protected, it's probably not meant to be accessed that way... see my other post. Usually multi-view documents in MFC have to be initialized through MFC methods/macros.
|
|
|
|
|
By the way, if the view already exists, trying to do what Jonathan suggests isn't the proper thing to do... if it exists, then you need to either use the framework to pass the message to the view or get a hold of the pointer to the view itself and do a SendMessage() to it.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
