|
hi friend,
First of all,you should keep updation in the topics(ICP\Ip protocols) and make a great knowledge about the serial ports are used in socket programming...
thanks & regards..
Best of luck....
R@j.....
|
|
|
|
|
I'm looking for cheap asp hosting has anyone tried this site dotnet-host.com
Thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
|
I'm looking at it, too.
No one has done it yet? 
|
|
|
|
|
I have not tried them either. I like the pricing but, if it's not reliable, then........
Frazzle the name say's it all
|
|
|
|
|
My problem is....I wouldn't be able to tell how reliable they are, since my sites get so little traffic they could be down for days at a time and no one, including me, would notice. 
|
|
|
|
|
You can use something like http://www.siteuptime.com/[^] to monitor the site for you. I have used them for years. They have a free plan.
GenJerDan wrote: I wouldn't be able to tell how reliable they are, since my sites get so little
traffic they could be down for days at a time and no one, including me, would
notice.
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't had to worry about it so far with my current provider (Pair). They never go down*, except for scheduled maintenance.
*well, I think they did once since I've been with them (starting in 1999).
|
|
|
|
|
David Asp wrote: I'm looking for cheap asp hosting has anyone tried this site dotnet-host.com
I signed up for their cheapest plan last night. Paid annually, it is only $1 a month. Enter the code 20OFF at check-out and that takes off 20%, reducing the annual cost to only $9.60. Thats 80 cents a month!
I have not done anything with the account yet, so I can't really comment on their reliability. I can say that their control panel looks nice and seems to work well. It looks like a "quality" service. But who knows?
Being listed on the Microsoft site and being a "certified Microsoft Small Business Specialist" sounds impressive; but again, who knows.
It may be too cheap to be true. We'll see. I'm just using it for tinkering around, so unless they go out of business or they're really horrible, I figure it will serve my needs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can anyone kindly suggest me which version of Visual Studio should be licensed on our Windows SBS, on which we are planning to deploy our web applications. Any other components that would be necessary going forward?
And also, in a development environment, do we need to have Visual Studio licensed on each developer's machine or do we have a shared/enterprise licensing available in Visual Studio.
|
|
|
|
|
I would think that Microsoft would be the best people to answer such a question.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I dont know if the term routing and forwarding are similar such that after I use the following
command
ROUTE -p ADD 192.168.1.4 MASK 255.255.255.255 192 192,168.1.111
and I ping 192.168.1.4 I would get a reply from the <gateway> 192.168.1.111
any clarafication appreciated
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
See here[^] for some helpful information; found by our good friend Google.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
the route command seems to take a IP address and point it to a gateway
If I want all traffic directed to 192.168.1.4 to be forwarded to 192.168.1.111 (192.168.1.111) is a IP on my laptop is route -p add 192.168.1.4 MASK 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.111 seems like the the proper command to do this
And if the commands takes how do I know its working
I assumed pinging 192.168.1.4
When I do that I get following message
Pinging 192.168.1.4 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.1.111: Destination host unreachable.
Reply from 192.168.1.111: Destination host unreachable.
Reply from 192.168.1.111: Destination host unreachable.
Reply from 192.168.1.111: Destination host unreachable.
Ping statistics for 192.168.1.4:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
|
|
|
|
|
ForNow wrote: the route command seems to take a IP address and point it to a gateway
That's exactly what is explained in the the link I posted above.
ForNow wrote: If I want all traffic directed to 192.168.1.4 to be forwarded to 192.168.1.111
That's not what the route command is for.
ForNow wrote: Reply from 192.168.1.111: Destination host unreachable.
Exactly, because you have not created a route to the destination.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
So how would I route 192.168.1.4 traffic to 192.168.1.111 192.168.1.111 (being the IP on my laptop 192.168.1.1 being the gateway)
I thought the command route -p ADD 192.168.1.4 MASK 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.111
does that
|
|
|
|
|
No, the route command tells the network layer how to get from a source IP address to a destination, by giving the address of a gateway. It does not reroute all messages destined for an IP address and send them somewhere different.
ForNow wrote: I thought the command route -p ADD 192.168.1.4 MASK 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.111 does that
In your example above you are saying that the route to destination address 192.168.1.4 can be found by sending messages through the gateway at address 192.168.1.111. The gateway machine is a message forwarder, not an alternative endpoint.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
In other words the gateway for 192.168.1.111
Which in my case is 192.168.1.1. Would be the gateway address for
192.168.1.4
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I don't understand what you are saying here.
What it comes down to is that you cannot change the destination IP address by means of the route command.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
How to force HTTPS for IIS 6 and 7 without making changes to the application source (config)?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
It's my first experience looking for Linux web hosting and the client will pay annual fees instead of monthly that's why I don't wantt to disappoint him when he finds the web hosting bad after few months..
can any one recommend a good features' and customer services' web host?
Thanks,
Jassim
|
|
|
|
|
Try bigrock.in
Apurv
If Java had true garbage collection, most programs would delete themselves upon execution.
|
|
|
|
|
A huge california legislation for nurse safety and protection (AB 1136 Legislation) passed on Friday (oct 7) and suddenly we need to host multiple info feeds for all the new law and legislation content...and there is a ton! What are the best hosting options / services for this type of thing? I am the sole webmaster and really have no experience with RSS, etc. . .
|
|
|
|
|
I've become unhappy with the reliablity of my current shell provider, and am looking to switch. To keep the billing hassle down as much as possible I'd like to go with a single company for both services; but finding one is difficult since most inexpensive shell providers don't appear to've upgraded their web hosting servers for several years with the result that they have pitifully small storage limits.
I'm not looking for anything particularly fancy. On the shell side just some sort of linux/bsd I can run a bnc process on (not an IRCd) with a vanity host. Currently I'm running psybnc; and would like to give ZNC a try because it can play back messages sent while I was disconnected but with my limited *nix skills probably won't take the effort unless there's an easy script provided to do the initial source download and compile steps for me. My web hosting use could be best described as an http file dump that I mostly use to share high quality pictures and other random stuff with friends. I don't have anything resembling a CMS (making it run sounds like work) or any serverside scripting/databases in use; all I really want/need is a few GB of storage on my domain that I can use to toss people URLs to. I really don't care what's running on the backend; but lamp hosting more or less wins by default from a cost perspective.
I know it's a bit off the beaten trail for the average CP user; but if anyone here has any useful suggestions I'd appreciate them.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
