|
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov wrote: Offending post:
Deleting div's in code behind.[^].
I replaced the spamming content, but it can be seen in the first version.
Already gone. Can't see it.
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov wrote: I would be happy to have a bad guy's account disabled.
Much better to post in Spam forum[^].
Peter
[edit]For those who are wondering what the elephant I'm on about, this reply was posted when the original message was in sugs'n'bugs. Now they're both here, which makes this post half oxymoronic. *I didn't do it!* [/edit]
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
modified 31-Jul-12 19:10pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nettrader is back[^]
Messages are here[^]
Go splatter!
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done.
Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H
OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported.
We need something here... like a Spaminator 2000! (Note, not an actual product [I think...]).
Bill Gates is a very rich man today... and do you want to know why? The answer is one word: versions.
Dave Barry
Read more at BrainyQuote[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
In this Q&A entry[^].
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
|
|
|
|
|
Not just there, there's a ton of spam in QA today, like this user[^].
Makes me wonder if the company that provided the anti-spam software that was insta-univoting tons of posts the other day is trying to make their services look more necessary... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've noticed a pattern, each account posts about 3 messages then stops, and each of them seems to be ~3 months old, someone's been planning this for a while...
|
|
|
|
|
Of all the tings one can do... This comes pretty low on the list....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth Haugland wrote: I wont call it spam
It's not spam, it's just people who don't understand how to update a question correctly.
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
|
|
|
|
|
That's normal in QA, just report the repost, warn the poster, and ignore it. The spam today is extremely unusual though.
|
|
|
|
|
Wonder what system those guys are using. An iSpam, perhaps?
(In the event you didn't know the 'i' stands for 'Infinite')
Bill Gates is a very rich man today... and do you want to know why? The answer is one word: versions.
Dave Barry
Read more at BrainyQuote[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not to be contrary, but what makes you say they are sock puppets and not just friends, colleagues or relatives?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I notice that most "answers" that are spam in QA are being reported and after a few you get the message that it's locked.
But why not just delete them? I'm sure if I have the rights to do that that most of the people here have that right.
So is there any reason why you guys don't delete them right away (which would clean up the questions a lot more than just reporting them) ?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
