|
< I'm going to respond at length here, because I feel this is such a critical issue for the future of Win 8, and Win devs >
Colin, my first thoughts, after reading the details of Win 8's schizophrenic marriage of Desktop and Modern/ex-Metro modes on Intel CPU's, as early as May-June, were: about the issue you describe: of possible inter-operation between the two modes.
I believe I posted a question here on CP about that issue more than several months ago, and asked: what is the technical road-block between an application running in Windows Desktop presenting an (optional) Modern UI, and interacting with it at very high-speed, as the end-user does whatever, or an incoming data feed changes ?
I believe the answer to that question, here on CP, was: that, at that point in time: the only known way for the two modes to inter-operate was by both setting a "file change watcher," and each mode getting a notification: which would mean, of course, that Modern would have to parse the changed file, and do whatever ... and vice-versa.
That information, seemed to me, at the time, baffling, almost absurd: if that remains true now: I'd conclude that effectively renders dynamic inter-operation between modes for 99% of applications impossible.
However, there may be no mystery here: the lack of inter-operation could be by design by MS. Or, also plausible, I think, is that this is not by design, but just the "fall out" of having separate gigantic teams at Microsoft not being concerned with this issue.
But, I think the scenario you propose here is not really dynamic inter-operation: when you describe the end-user essentially switching from one mode to another, in your example of someone "walking off" with a Surface in Modern UI "at the same place" they were in using a Desktop application, I see that as a more static scenario that requires a one-time creation of equivalent UI and state. So, in that scenario, simultaneous updating of any "symbiotic" Desktop UI and Modern UI applications do not have to be performed.
Note that I am not crusading here for "dynamic inter-operation:" I can see a much more likely scenario as being the end-user wanting to switch from a Desktop app with a very complex UI to a Modern UI that is much less complex, or more limited in functionality.
Second, I can easily imagine a somewhat "dynamic scenario" that, in the "Enterprise space," such an important revenue source for MS, that a big company would want workers "outside the office," with a tablet with UI in Metro Mode, that was communicating back-and-forth with some Desktop app presenting the full Desktop UI "back in the office" (or server-side app ?) via wi-fi, cellular, internet cloud, via whatever. Or, said field worker returns back to the office, and docks the tablet, and then: there's the full-featured Desktop UI "in the same place" as you describe.
However, from what you say here, and whatever Pete O'H. is referring to with the term "message bus," I assume there's an alternative in the area of inter-operation now, or, at least, you are exploring that area.
I look forward to hearing more from you about your work, and I'd relish hearing more from Pete O'H., about the "message bus" whatever.
And, I "add my vote to" the other comments here that suggest there's great value to CP, to all of "us," in your writing about whatever work on inter-operation, or "mode state-swapping," you are doing ... when the time is right for you to do so.
Naturally, I welcome any response to these comments; if my neck's out of joint on the issues here, I welcome any free chiropractic manipulations, even if they: "crack me up" 
best, Bill
~
Confused by Windows 8 ? This may help: [ ^] !
modified 17-Oct-12 4:14am.
|
|
|
|
|
Bill - you can find an idea of what I'm talking about here[^]. Currently I'm sticking to a single machine, but the idea of the whole distributed app fabric really does interest me. The areas I've been concentrating on relate to how to partition things so that they make sense when you take multiple application form factors into account. It's proving to be an interesting challenge.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: I can't stand it. What I can't stand most is that, at its core it's an excellent OS. Security, the tweaks like the resource manager, file copies, the underlying security, and the general stability is excellent. A far more stable and flexible OS than iOS, and I use both.
The split of the UI, however, is so clumsily done that the fall is the worse for it being on something that should be so much better. I used to go back to iOS and complain about dumb things like having to eject USB storage, or not being able to shake a window and have all other windows collapse, or the stupidness of the "+" sign on iTunes minimising it. Now I no longer complain. Now I just stay quiet and sad.
I couldn't have said it better myself.
|
|
|
|
|
I like Windows 8 for it's beautiful design .
|
|
|
|
|
anntony_wang wrote: I like Windows 8 for it's beautiful design .
Really? Ok, likes and dislikes are highly personal. But honestly, this is the first time I really think they over-designed this part of software. By over-designing I think of letting look and feel decide or overrule technical details too much.
The marriage between mobile and desktop ends in many many small compromises, which in the end sound like: We want do have it all! Why, MS, do you think you can do Desktop AND Mobile? These two things have so few things in common I think, that putting them "somehow" together ends up with a big confusion for all users. Even MS fanboys will have a hard time.
I would have highly appreciated a software vendor deciding to support the desktop like it always did, and in parallel launching it´s Apple clone "Surface" with lets say "Windows 7 Mobile"...
But it was not decided this way. Still I could somehow live with it. I could switch to Linux now. But....
WHY on earth the whole world starts to adopt metro design NOW? Webpages and lots of 3rd-party stuff looks really like Kindergarten design now. With all graphic & CPU power, we reduce icons to 2-color schemes, making all things boxy?
Its an offense for my eyes and for the whole development of GUI & stuff to finally end up with this simplyfied, stupid looking designs. Thats what is my pure personal meaning.
regards Florian
|
|
|
|
|
"With a host of new tools and capabilities--such as Secure Boot, Windows To Go and greatly improved file management--Windows 8 may have broad appeal in a variety of businesses."
You're kidding, right? I mean, I sure can't wait for secure boot! I'll be so secure from installing non-Microsoft software!
http://www.yannbane.com/
|
|
|
|
|
Everytime I logon onto my Windows 2012 server or Windows 8 machine I can't help but reminded that if I wanted a MAC I would have gone to the Apple Store up the street and bought one!
RAM
|
|
|
|
|
In my times we used the command line and we didn't care about flashy "GUIs" that just distract people from their job... 
Seriously, i like the new Windows 8, it seems modern and fresh, what i dislike is the disaster they made with the API, if you come from Win32 you won't find it familiar, if you come from .NET you won't find it famaliar either, i would have prefered that they stick with .NET and just add Async calls to their methods and block the non Async calls in Modern UI Apps, but whatever, compatibility APIs, may be a good bussiness for me.
|
|
|
|
|
GeekForChrist wrote: Give it some time and you might like it too.
Some prisoners find that after many years that they prefer prison to the rest of the world.
However myself I don't see that as being an effective argument for being in prison.
|
|
|
|
|
jschell wrote: Some prisoners find that after many years that they prefer prison to the rest of the world.
However myself I don't see that as being an effective argument for being in prison.
I see your point and I agree with it. 
And if someone would get me out of prison (aka: buy me a Mac), I would be willing to try life outside of prison. 
|
|
|
|
|
I've considered buying a Mac, until I realized it's in the high-security tract. 
I may yet switch to Linux, but as jschell said, life out of prison may not appear preferable: suddenly you need to take care of all kind of things you were taking for granted...
|
|
|
|
|
Stefan_Lang wrote: suddenly you need to take care of all kind of things you were taking for
granted...
I'm with you there.
I tried Ubuntu for a bit but I got really frustrated because I couldn't understand how to do anything beyond what a "regular" user could do. 
In short, I couldn't be the "expert" I wanted to be. 
|
|
|
|
|
I may need more information, but after reading a dozen or more articles I'm still missing even a single argument for switching to W8. I only use Windows on high-end desktop PCs. Metro is pointless or even outright bad for my purposes, so I won't be using it. I am not aware of reasons in favor of W8 outside the UI that would even apply to my main use of a PC.
Metro may be good to use on devices that are designed for gesture-based input, but currently I consider it detrimental for using it on workstations. I could of course run W8 in desktop mode, but I wouldn't know why.
Maybe the articles I read focus too much on Metro; I am lacking information about the improvements made to the core OS, and have a hard time finding any. Are there no relevant changes in this area?
|
|
|
|
|
Stefan_Lang wrote: Maybe the articles I read focus too much on Metro; I am lacking information
about the improvements made to the core OS, and have a hard time finding any.
Are there no relevant changes in this area?
I haven't seen anything good happen in the core OS either.
I guess I'm an oddball in the fact that I've begun to appreciate Metro. 
|
|
|
|
|
In an unprecedented move, Microsoft earlier this week shipped four non-security related updates to its Windows 8 operating system--barely two weeks before it goes on sale on October 26. This could be interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
What? Microsoft still haven't yet managed to make 100% perfect, completely bug free software that works 100% of the time on all hardware configurations and devices and includes every piece of functionality I demand, including the IKitchenSink interface implementation??
That's it. I'm writing a letter to the editor.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
The most interesting part of that is something I haven't seen any of the tech press pick up on. Since MS did ship relevant fixes to the OEMs there actually is a valid argument in favor of de-crapping your laptops initial OS install instead of reflexively wiping it.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
So, MS must have found 4 serious bugs that they would rather not get more calls on...
|
|
|
|
|
At a young age, we learn to count on our fingers – starting out with 1-5, then 1-10, and maybe, if you’re particularly enterprising as a toddler, you will learn to count to 20, 30, and beyond. No one ever attempts to enlighten us that we are actually making some more complex mathematical assumptions; we all know Base10, to be precise. In this article, we’ll start by gaining a more rounded understanding of Base10 and its structure, then we will discuss binary (Base2, the building blocks of computing). Finally, we’ll finish things up by talking about Base32 and Base64. At each stage we will discuss the advantages and uses for each type. There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, those who don't, and those who confuse it with trinary.
|
|
|
|
|
This post is in response to Dr. Dobb’s editor, Andrew Binstock’s recent editorial about the universality of unit testing. I think we all can agree that it’s universally accepted that unit tests are good. But what about Test Driven Development (TDD)? 8 reasons why TDD is much better than simply implementing unit tests.
|
|
|
|
|
What debate? Roughly everyone who could be convinced by relentless repetition of "TDD does the dishes, too" and anecdotical evidence of TDDgasms already is. But that's not enough in my book to accept it as the truth.
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed: it has a place but is not a universal panacea for all of your coding ills.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
|
|
|
|
|
There seems to be a lot of confusion among developers on how garbage collectors actually work. They really aren’t as magical as some people think; in many ways, some garbage collectors are actually quite crude and — by modern developer standards — evil, unmaintainable, and full of subtle gotchas (the latter is certainly true no matter one’s perspective). In this post, I’ll try to shed some light on how GCs work in a way that (hopefully) any developer can understand. I do assume that the reader is at least familiar with basic computer memory concepts (C knowledge is preferred). Note: This is a very long blog post. Grab some coffee.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
