|
Working good for me in IE and FF
Regards.
--------
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
1) Check the 'Layout' option of the forum. If 'No javascript' is selected, it is intended to work that way. More likely.
2) Slow internet speed? Let the page load fully. When you click a message while the page is loading, it will refresh the page in any browser.
3) Check the browser setting if it is blocking javascript to run. Less likely as you use the site regularly.
|
|
|
|
|
I was trying to demonstrate that when we edit a post the title gets appended with [modified], and a timestamp is added to the message. However, I have edited this message[^] four times and the change has not been done. Is it a simple timing issue?
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
modified 19-Nov-12 3:18am.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure (but I could be well and truly wrong) that you only get the [modified] tag if the message has been replied to.
If you get an email telling you that you can catch Swine Flu from tinned pork then just delete it. It's Spam.
|
|
|
|
|
the 'modified' tag only appears if you modify a message at least 5 mins after it was posted.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, that makes more sense.
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
|
|
|
|
|
In the mobile development section of the articles area, I see Windows Phone 7 but not Windows Phone 8. I figure that this should be added soon. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
This is something I started to notice yesterday. On the front page of the site, when I click refresh, click the logo or type "codeproject.com" into the address bar it does not seem to update the page. The latest content in each section ("Latest Articles" and "Our Community", for example) show new links but they suddenly disappear (not even a second later) and the content that I used to see on the page shows back up. I have to close the tab, open a new one and then navigate back to CP. I've only used Chrome and I haven't had much time to check it in other browsers yet. Anyone else been seeing this?
djj55: Nice but may have a permission problem
Pete O'Hanlon: He has my permission to run it.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 13-Nov-12 9:38am.
|
|
|
|
|
The comments in Q&A have quite funny looking icons. The icons under the questions and also the answers look fine to me.
IE 8, FF 16 and Chrome both show this behaviour.
Defective Icons.
Cheers!
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
That's some nice pixelation. I've tried on all major browsers and I can't replicate the issue. Which OS are you on? It looks like it may be (wild guess) a video driver issue, since those icons are meant to have reduced opacity when you aren't hovering over them, and maybe that's causing the display issues.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Apostrophe is turned into ' in the reputation list.
m.bergman
For Bruce Schneier, quanta only have one state : afraid.
To succeed in the world it is not enough to be stupid, you must also be well-mannered. -- Voltaire
In most cases the only difference between disappointment and depression is your level of commitment. -- Marc Maron
I am not a chatbot
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here[^]
The sidebar does not expand like it does on the other pages. It simply links to another page.
I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image.
Stephen Hawking
|
|
|
|
|
IT works fine for me. Which browser?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I think it was a Firefox goof, as it works fine now.  I will take a screenshot if it happens again.
I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image.
Stephen Hawking
|
|
|
|
|
And one more for the Maunder Dictionary[^]!
I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image.
Stephen Hawking
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello all, I have been thinking about posting this during a time.
First of all I want to congratulate the CP-Staff for their work. I know that you already have plenty of work with the site as it is, but I would like to suggest the creation of a new section, because I see that CP is one of the best sites in the net and it involves more and more technologies with the time.
The section I want to suggest is about industry automation. That could involve PLC-Programming, Robot-Programming, Scripting in HMI-Scadas, Bus-Hardware and things like that.
Many people will consider that those subjects are not worth enough to be considered here, but I can tell that industry programming can be tricky and difficult enough to deserve a place in CP where people can ask and learn about these themes.
I know that PLCs and HMIs have a huge graphical / object programming part and that they are very machine related, that can make difficult to understand the problem in some situations, but there are a lot of general situations and different ways to program things.
There are languages that could be comparable to others already covered in CP. For instance: AWL and SCL in Siemens PLCs, Scripts for WinCC Flex (based in VB), Database for the communication and protocolling, Interaction between PLCs and PCs, Ethernet and Socket Protocols, Robot scripting, Visual recognition and image processing… And on the side of Hardware: Configuration of Bus-Slaves, Servomotors, interaction between peripheral elements. Communication Protocols as CAN Bus, Profibus, Profinet, Ethernet…
I have been talking to some members of CP that already have a bit background in this technologies, one of the most known is Sascha Barber (I asked for permission to use his name) and they are agree that could be a good idea and that these technologies are worth to be considered a part of our community. That’s the reason why I have decided to post this suggestion to see if there are more members that could be interested and if the CP-Staff would think about the possibility of adding the section.
Thank you very much and sorry for the long post.
Regards.
--------
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
That's a great idea. We have a hardware section, but I'm always looking for one. Typically what we do is we'll have a generic section, with specific subsections, and then as the subsections expand we may break out the subsections into their own sections.
I can't actually think of any software related article topics we wouldn't want.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
modified 11-Nov-12 20:59pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Congrats on the new entry into the Maunder Dictionary[^]!
I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image.
Stephen Hawking
|
|
|
|
|
Did I mention I'm hungover? I actually think I'm still in bed with a pillow over my head. Or at least I should be.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Who doesn't want to be in bed with a pillow over their head? I know I would (and I am in bed. No pillow though)
I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image.
Stephen Hawking
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much for your feedback Chris. I was a bit afraid about it. If you need more details or examples about what I was meaning, so you can make the section, sub-section structure... don't hesitate to contact me. I will be glad on helping you as good as I can.
Regards.
--------
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Two thoughts on this
1. Would this fit into the "Internet of Things" chapter? I'm not sure it would but wanted to clarify your thoughts. Automation of hardware doesn't necessarily mean "connected" hardware in an IoT theme.
2. Again, we need articles before we have a section or subsection. Any lying around you feel would fit in a potential section or subsection?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
