|
Apologies for the delay Dan, I think the dev team is a little swamped is all. I will gently prod them 
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Are you still getting these? I found an issue a while ago that I fixed but forgot to update this thread.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Today I had a question, and nobody answered. But I have solved it finally. I wanted to add my solution as it should be added, but I have not found "I have solved it myself" widget. So I added it as normal answer. And at that moment the missing widget appeared. So I posted my solution there too. But I couldn't delete my other answer. And that one was accepted automatically, even after rejecting it.
Oh, and by the way, by rejecting my normal answer, I have lost 200 points  Why?
No comment, suggestion, or answer after 4 days... seem to be my very own problem... 
modified 23-Feb-13 12:25pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I can see the 'Articles Needing Approval' again. Could a hamster look at that? I don't have the rep to do that.
Bob Dole The internet is a great way to get on the net.
 2.0.82.7292 SP6a
|
|
|
|
|
When in doubt, take a look at the privileges tab on your profile page.
(I've opened up permissions a bit)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Privileges tab show I can delete questions in Q&A. I was able to see the Delete icon for questions till yesterday. Since this morning, I cannot see delete icon anymore. Surely a bug.
|
|
|
|
|
Confirmed. Not even site Protectors have the delete icon available.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Yes - this is unavailable until the next update (maybe tomorrow, maybe next week)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I forgot about that tab. 
Bob Dole The internet is a great way to get on the net.
2.0.82.7292 SP6a
|
|
|
|
|
I have been wondering about this the whole past three months:
Can we define a default signature somewhere in our settings or do we have to set it up every time we post a message from scratch (I currently use this method  )?
I haven't found anything - even though I looked in the FAQ and every settings option of my account but there was nothing...
cheers,
Marco Bertschi
|
|
|
|
|
Go to your profile and click on My Settings. Click the Forums tab. Below the Default Paste options radio buttons is a Message Signature textbox.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you Pete.
Seems like I became a complete moron who is not able to find anything without any system documentation 
|
|
|
|
|
|
I believer the CP "Quick Answer" feature is to help the genuine programmers who had been stuck on a problem or a bug, that they couldn't figure out how to solve it.
BUT,again and again I noticed that some people post "Quick Answer" question, that should have searched on the google in the first place for example request sourcecode c# for jenetic algoritm[^].
These people doesn't even have the technical capabilities to search their question on google, so why don't CP has a filter mechanism that, when people post "Quick Answer" question, they must post their code and without a piece of code, they are not allowed to post question.
What do others think about this?
Think! Don't write a line of code unless you absolutely need to.
|
|
|
|
|
And if I have a question requesting clarification about about a design pattern? Do I have to make up code for this? Perhaps I'm asking a question about a particular architecture I'm considering and I want to know if anyone can see any holes in the design I'm planning.
|
|
|
|
|
Suppose you could attach a design diagram. That wouldn't be hard would it?
Think! Don't write a line of code unless you absolutely need to.
|
|
|
|
|
If all you're doing is asking a question where you can easily lay it out in words, then why would you want to include a design diagram? All you have done here is put a barrier to people asking a question. It's better to educate them that they stand a better chance of getting an answer if they actually include all the relevant information than it is to prevent them posting the question in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|
We cannot forget the fact that those who have the capacity to be educated, will use it wisely. BUT those who has absolutely zero intellectual capacity will not be educated and giving them equal share is a drain on the others.
Think! Don't write a line of code unless you absolutely need to.
|
|
|
|
|
Jegan Thiyagesan wrote: BUT those who has absolutely zero intellectual capacity will not be educated and
giving them equal share is a drain on the others
I don't agree. All that happens for those users is that they don't get their questions answered. It's their loss.
|
|
|
|
|
This is exactly why this conversation started. Those who post irrelevant questions don't get their answered that is because we read their question and decided this is not the question to answered. So somewhat it is wasting the time of a member who could have answered a genuine question.
Think! Don't write a line of code unless you absolutely need to.
|
|
|
|
|
I disagree I'm afraid. Your recommendation means that you are going to have a lot fewer questions - even from those who could improve, and all you've done is moved people over to StackOverflow. Educate them. Don't stop them using the site.
|
|
|
|
|
CP is professional site for professionals, this is not facebook for dummies. The place for dummies to get educated is Google not CP neither StackOverflow.
CP "Quick Answer" feature is not about collecting questions on CP nor collecting members. this is about one developer helping another. Having an option for the author to support their question with a code, diagram, picture, screen shot, etc, will improve the quality of answer as well as response time.
Think! Don't write a line of code unless you absolutely need to.
|
|
|
|
|
Where does it say it's only for professionals? That's one heck of a condescending notion. Take a look at the tagline. "for those who code"
I'm sorry to say, but this idea gets my vote of no.
|
|
|
|
|
It would be nice to give CPIans the ability to sort bookmarks in different ways than the actual per section.
Personnaly I am using bokmarks as a kind of "I will read this article later" so I'd find practical to have the ability to sort bookmarks by "bookmarked date desc". I could then easily browse the latest bookmarks I have nor read yet...
Seulement, dans certains cas, n'est-ce pas, on n'entend guère que ce qu'on désire entendre et ce qui vous arrange le mieux... [^]
|
|
|
|
|
Go to the Search page, enter "*" in the search box and click Search. Select 'Everything' and 'My Bookmarks'. You can then select a sort. While you can't sort by bookmarked date desc, you can sort by date create (or modified) desc.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
