|
Hi CP,
Member Deep Sa[^] is listed as number 3 in the list of "Top Experts in 24hrs Error".
But when I saw his Authority points, it is 152, whereas the points in "Top Experts in 24hrs Error" box, it is 200.
Is it a bug ?
Thanks,
Tadit
|
|
|
|
|
Probably unsynchronized Servers, when you visited the profile you landed in one server with not actual data. You can try to reload a couple of times, it usually solves it
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: reload a couple of times
Done several times, but the same.
Have you tried and find out the problem ?
Let me know what is the Authority points you see.
|
|
|
|
|
Top Experts got updated every hour. So you have to wait for one hour (or exact O'Clock) after answer posted/upvoted/accepted to get it updated in Top Experts section.
http://developer.sheikhharis.com
|
|
|
|
|
I know this feature.
And I was not loading to see the Top Expert List.
I was reloading that member's profile to see how much points exactly he has got, which was lesser than the points mentioned in Top Expert list.
That was the issue.
|
|
|
|
|
The article titled: "XSD Tutorial - Part 1 of 5 - Elements and Attributes" has many bugs in the html used to display the sample code. The problem is that in many cases, the html tags "<br />" and "<code>" appear in the text instead of being interpreted. In the beginning of the article, this wasn’t a big deal, but as the code examples got more complex, I needed to past the code into notepad to reformat it so I could absorb the benefit of the example. The article appears to be excellent otherwise.
NOTE: After posting I had to edit the text because the "br" and "code" tags were interpreted.
|
|
|
|
|
This means that these elements were encoded in the sample code. In other words, the author posted in <> tags and left them as they were so that the code behind actually shows them as < and >.
|
|
|
|
|
There are other cases that trigger the problem: Let's say you have something like
BYTE CByteArray::GetAt( int <nIndex> ) const;
if you don't tag it correctly then when submitting you get weird tags closing in your code like < /nIndex> because of the autocheck of the system.
Mostly is avoidable, if the autor takes care and uses the preview, but not all do it
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I believe I have rescued it.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Why is it not possible to add comments to the first revision of a blog entry in the Approval Queue?
Most recently, I wanted to ask Pete about the indentation in his code blocks...
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
I'll answer that - seems that Wordpress decided to eat the indentation. Sometimes the code block works okay in Wordpress, othertimes it decides to play funny.
|
|
|
|
|
So you have to go in and manually patch it up?
I have to be honest. Given the experience of the blog author (that would be you), I figured it had to be a problem on my side and I checked several things before I was fairly certain it had to be something else. 
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
SoMad wrote: So you have to go in and manually patch it up?
Yup. Just finished.
|
|
|
|
|
I was writing a message in the Lounge on my iPhone, and previewed it before posting. However, once I posted, the message was HTML encoded. It seems the preview button ignored the "Treat my content as plain text, not as HTML" checkbox.
|
|
|
|
|
Also, I "fixed" the message in question, and the HR above the signature appears to have disappeared.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello! I need to password protect or prevent deleting history from opera browser (and any other browsers on my PC).
Is it possible? How?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sorry, but you've asked this question in the wrong forum. You may want to take this up in the Quick Answers section.
|
|
|
|
|
|
OK Sorry I didnt' know. Ill create a new post in quick answers then...Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
I posted an answer to a recent question that had itself just been posted.
Immediately on return to the QA page the question showed as both having 1 answer (correct) and green ticked to show the answer as accepted (hmm).
I thought this was a little swift and my name was still being shown as the latest updater so I returned to the question which was as I'd left it, no acceptance comments or additional responses showing there and then back to the main QA page to see the question now in the correct state, no green tick as accepted.
I guess this is another instance of a caching issue but this time adding information rather than being behind the curve with updates. Uninitialised variable perhaps or is the default state of a newly posted question answer-accepted? That would be wierd.
"The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage."
Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/PHP/[^]
IE10 reports a failure and wants to shut down. Same is true at the KB level. IE9 takes a long time to display the page (but it eventually comes up.)
|
|
|
|
|
I am experiencing no problems.
Did you try disabling all add-ons to see if one off them causes the problem?
0100000101101110011001000111001011101001
|
|
|
|
|
I had posted a question under quick answers.
Someone has downvoted the question itself.
But I don't know why and by whom.
|
|
|
|
|
No you can't see who has downvoted your question.
The cause is simple: The hamsters want to prevent univoter wars because there would be a bunch of people going through all the stuff someone has posted who has downvoted one of their items which would blast of the whole sense of the voting system.
About your question:
I assume that it is this one[^].
I think it was downvoted because you have not explained what you have tried so far and where you are stuck, the major cause why a question gets downvoted.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes Marco.
I got it.
I wanted to atleast know the reason for the downvote.
It was a general conceptual question and not related to any specific programming issue.
Thanks for the reply 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
