|
It was the tiny gap that occurred between me pressing the [SUBMIT] Button on the HMRC CIS Return page of the website and the realisation that I had missed off the tax value.
One 25 minute phone call later and all is well.
Such an embuggerment.
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
Our government website is really good : you can update anytime until the deadline, so in your case I could have just modified it again. The end of the process is the time, not the submit.
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
Our government revels in shite websites.
For example...
For years one would click on a choice of company and a drop down would appear.
You would select the company and the autofill would put in a password.
Now when you select, it automatically puts in THE LAST PASSWORD YOU USED.
Which is ok if all the companies had the same password.
(Which they don't).
Not only do they change something that has worked for years, they do not tell anyone about it and the next thing you know is that you are locked out for 2 hours before you can change the details.
Oh, and don't even ASK about changing the password.
They email you Half of the new password then POST the second half.
It is Dickensian.
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
Our government pays big money for sites that do not work.
Our tax site has a disclaimer which states that information given by the written instructions or people working for the IRS may not be correct and you are liable for their mistakes.
|
|
|
|
|
Corporal Agarn wrote: Our tax site has a disclaimer which states that information given by the written instructions or people working for the IRS may not be correct and you are liable for their mistakes.
You don't expect the government to be responsible for their mistakes do you? 
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
I'm on-line therefore I am.
JimmyRopes
|
|
|
|
|
Corporal Agarn wrote: you are liable for their mistakes.
Perhaps things have changed back, but some years ago they IRS took responsibility for it's agent's information, at least so far as to absolve you from any penalties incurred. You don't get off paying the tax.
It could have been changed back.
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos wrote: some years ago they IRS took responsibility for it's agent's information
Unless you record every conversation with the agents, or get things in writing, you will have no way of proving what the agent said.
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
I'm on-line therefore I am.
JimmyRopes
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dalek Dave wrote: What is shorter than a Yotto Second?
I'm so tempted to answer this in a juvenile way, but I'll rise above that and have another guess.
Your pen is?
|
|
|
|
|
This. I like it. 
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
You like DD's pen?
A ghost from the past. Known to others as "Linda".
|
|
|
|
|
Pen is a euphemism, isn't it? 
You saw DD's pen! 
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
I'm on-line therefore I am.
JimmyRopes
|
|
|
|
|
I think you mean a yoctosecond. 
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
I believe that is called an ohnoSecond?
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining on topic ("What is shorter than a Yotto Second?"), I suggest we start with 1/2 Yotto second and work our way from there.
(now I feel a bit better, but more coffee undoubtedly will help).
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
This[^] is the shortest conceivable time interval.
Interestingly, it also measures the attention span of the typical marketing representative.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
I was just bashing some C# as opposed to V(shudder)B I have been doing lately and was struck by a bit of syntax
I have been using for years with out seeing how odd it looked:
(char)13 I forgot it and typed:
char(13)
It's not just me who finds this odd, is it?
|
|
|
|
|
Odd? Not really. I get caught up it that a lot since I work using ANSI C for the embedded firmware to using Objective C for writing iOS apps that interface with the product. I also will use VB6, VB.NET or C# to collect raw streaming serial data from our product as well. There are general commonalities in coding structures that are common to all. Once you become familiar with them, switching between them isn't all that difficult, most of the differences are just syntactical in nature.
The one one that usually gets me is remembering to use
as opposed to using
when commenting in the code.
What I do find odd are the programming language zealots who insist that their language of choice is the only language that should be used or that some languages are for "children" or starter languages like VB.
To be honest VB should not be considered a starter language, it provide too many ways to learn bad coding habits. But I do like using VB for some things.
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
S Houghtelin wrote: To be honest VB should not be considered a starter language, it provide too many ways to learn bad coding habits. But I do like using VB for some things.
Wasn't that BASIC's intended purpose? (Beginner's language, not teaching bad habits - which it does). That's what I was told at school. Of course, the same teacher wouldn't believe that hammerhead sharks existed or the reason their heads are that shape, so mod through that little gem.
|
|
|
|
|
Keith Barrow wrote: Beginner's language, not teaching bad habits - which it does
I guess that was my point when I said "VB should not be considered a starter language". The language did not meet the intended result, it did make some things easy to do, especially when it comes to abusing features like loose variant type. Option Explicit and Option Strict should enabled by default.
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
S Houghtelin wrote: I work using ANSI C for the embedded firmware to using Objective C for writing iOS apps
S Houghtelin wrote: I also will use VB6, VB.NET or C# to collect raw streaming serial data from our product as well.
S Houghtelin wrote: I do like using VB for some things.
If you program in C like languages for embedded and iOS why would you ever want to use VB, and have such a syntax change, when you can use C# for anything for which you can us VB? 
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
I'm on-line therefore I am.
JimmyRopes
|
|
|
|
|
JimmyRopes wrote: why would you ever want to use VB
It's what the client wants.
Generally it's because that's the language that their "coder" is accustomed to using.
I guess I've spent enough time converting VB code to C# and back that I'm not uncomfortable using either. Most of my time in the last couple of years has been primarily C#.
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
S Houghtelin wrote: JimmyRopes wrote: why would you ever want to use VB
It's what the client wants.
Good answer. 
S Houghtelin wrote: I guess I've spent enough time converting VB code to C# and back that I'm not uncomfortable using either.
I just questioned it because you mentioned two other varieties of C and also C# so I didn't see why you would prefer VB for some tasks.
S Houghtelin wrote: Most of my time in the last couple of years has been primarily C#.
That would be my choice if given the option.
About 15 years ago I had a contract with a company that used VB6. I found the level of the programmers to be very junior even when they had many years experience.
As I used to joke to my friends when we would get together to have a few beers and complain about the clients, "they say they have 10 years experience but is was the same year 10 times".
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
I'm on-line therefore I am.
JimmyRopes
|
|
|
|
|
And
This one gets me almost every other week. I'll type // instead of ; and things will break. It's ridiculous, I just can't get used to it - which is weird considering it's the first language I learned.
|
|
|
|
|
It is odd in so many aspects.
Veni, vidi, vici.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
