|
Edwin Hubble?
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
Nope.
OG got it above ^
(though I bet he googled!)
|
|
|
|
|
Nah - I visit QA, and you aren't allowed to google if you go there... 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Easy. Paris Hilton in her famous treatise "Thoughts rattling around the empty spaces"
|
|
|
|
|
That's the first verse of Firework by Katy Perry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That had a link to this[^]. I hope that 'woman' (I use the term loosely) and her Lawyer go to [REDACTED]. She is a [REDACTED].
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
|
|
|
|
|
That [REDACTED] thing is pretty good...gonna steal that 
|
|
|
|
|
I got it from someone else here (JSOP I think). So go ahead. It works.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
|
|
|
|
|
Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
The jamming device I use, as one woman discovered last night while in traffic on her phone behind me, is that the car behind me does not get to move forward while the numpty driving it is on the phone.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
"The FCC says that jamming devices cannot be authorized because they can compromise the integrity of the nations communications infrastructure, including 911 and police calls during an emergency."
Well that gives me a warm and fuzzy feeling, knowing that our nations communications infrastructure can be so easily compromised by some joe in an SUV. 
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe the way to use one would be to leave it off.
Then, if you see someone in a nearby car, or next to you in a restaurant or movie, turn it on for a few seconds.
|
|
|
|
|
I would have an absolute blast playing with one, especially with the missus!
|
|
|
|
|
> Where can I buy one?
I'd think the guy who got caught using his won't be using it anymore. Make him an offer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
it means this:
var x = (a == null) ? null : a.b.c
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
They've clearly defined what it means and it's a construct that we've written many times in its extended form. I don't really see why this will introduce bugs, if anything it will reduce them because it's not that hard to write the ternary wrong (e.g. get the condition backwards).
|
|
|
|
|
If type 'c' is an integer, and 'a' is null do you expect x to be null, or 0?
|
|
|
|
|
I'd expect that to be a compile time error to be honest, but if it's permitted then it should be default(c.GetType()) i.e. 0. It couldn't be null because the type of myString?.Length is int, not int?.
|
|
|
|
|
I also think it should be default(c.getType()) - we shall wait and see.
|
|
|
|
|
I remember the first time I saw a universal remote control...I thought to myself "Well this changes everything".
Along with Antimatter and Dark Matter they've discovered the existence of Doesn't Matter which appears to have no effect on the universe whatsoever!
Rich Tennant 5th Wave
|
|
|
|
|
Batteries still die, though, so nothing changes.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
