|
HTML5 introduces holes in operating systems
The fact that HTML5 runs on XP and XP has no protection against it is the reason.
modified 10-May-14 13:13pm.
|
|
|
|
|
You're only seeing users who have internet at home, but that users are a minority compared to companies.
In large and medium-sized businesses, the internet is controlled by a firewall and other software as sharepoint. In these cases all accesses are controlled. Computers in domain in these companies do not have access to install or run software unauthorized private applications. Everything is controlled.
Employees only have access to work sites and not to external sites such as facebook.
NKS
|
|
|
|
|
A firewall doesn't protect against HTML, it passes through it without a second thought
Everything is controlled said the major company that was about to be hacked.
A group policy computer in a controlled environment doesn't ensure 0 undesired software makes its way onto the machine.
XP is a walk in the park.
Also software doesn't even need to get directly on the machine to be an issue. If any resources over a intranet access updated code it opens the local machine up to a hacker like their connected via VPN
modified 12-May-14 7:16am.
|
|
|
|
|
For HTML5 I would require it in old machines only maybe for browsing the web, then the responsibility will be lead to the Internet browser you use...
If is an old machine probably you are not upgrading the software of that PC that means you will no install new word processors that uses HTML5 (probably the modern applications can't run in that old machines)
then HTML5 for desktop apps is not a problem, your desktop just doesn't support html5! and if it's for internet browser or web apps, all the responsibility is in the Internet Browsers you use, the I would better apply your idea to what about Java, M.Flash and Silverlight... that probably will not be supporting winXP in a couple of months.
|
|
|
|
|
Desktop apps can leverage HTML5
|
|
|
|
|
I agree, you should upgrade if you need otherwise is a waste of money.
NKS
|
|
|
|
|
If it is dead, no longer sold, no source-code, not supported- then you NEEDED to upgrade. Anyone who hasn't should not be allowed to administer a network. That includes the idiots in the government that also said that upgrading "wasn't required".
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I do not agree, there are many situations where this is not possible.
for example: companies that have machines dedicated to specific tasks with specific hardware windows xp and in these cases an upgrade involves changing the hardware of the machine, new drivers ... the price is too high to upgrade and certain machines can pass $ 100,000 or more per machine.
A real example set in the company where I work, we still have machines running Windows 98, they only communicate via RS232. They are fast and working smoothly, maintenance is minimal and inexpensive, an upgrade in this case is a waste of money since it costs almost as much as buying a new one. The company has the top technology but in certain situations it is not profitable.
I just agree to domestic users and even then there are still cases that this is a waste of money.
NKS
|
|
|
|
|
I would move to at least Win 7 personally. There are lots of nice little usability features that make Win 7 a bit easier to deal with than XP. For me personally the window snapping features in 7 and 8 are a must have anymore.
If your machines are not capable to run 7 there is a chance they may be able to run 8. The upcoming updates to 8 are *supposedly* going to make it nicer for desktop users.
|
|
|
|
|
If you are using "cost" as a reason not to upgrade, here's a small "fact".
It would not cost "$500" per PC to upgrade.
Just this week I was doing some research for a relative who was looking to "upgrade".
Without too much difficulty I found refurbished PC's: 2GB RAM; 80GB hard drive; 2.4 GHz processor; with Windows 7 installed; for $99. (I would just add the other PC's hard drive as drive "D" to save on "conversion costs" .... a 5 minute job).
(I personally own a "refurb" that I bought in 2004 and is still running .... XP ... that I use for version testing).
Now, if you just wanted a copy of Windows 7, the price is about the same!
|
|
|
|
|
You obviously have a simple system!
|
|
|
|
|
You obviously have not seen my "system".
You're confusing a single "computer" and OS with the peripherals, network, and "other" servers and clients.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I am "confusing" the computer with an operating entity. If the computer doesn't work, neither does the entity.
Glad your life is so simple!
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Without too much difficulty I found refurbished PC's: 2GB RAM; 80GB hard drive; 2.4 GHz processor; with Windows 7 installed; for $99. (I would just add the other PC's hard drive as drive "D" to save on "conversion costs" .... a 5 minute job).
dude! that is not an upgrade today, if that hardware fails in a year your friend can hava a bad day trying to get parts...
also, a pc with that spects (used) will cost like 200 USD due import taxes, plus antivirus, office and your compant software, that will require time and money!!!
but I agree that options exist... some recomend to move to linux or like... (I don't the time that will require just to teach the users will cost more that just buying new windows pcs... Time is money!)
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Without too much difficulty I found refurbished PC's: 2GB RAM; 80GB hard drive; 2.4 GHz processor; with Windows 7 installed; for $99. (I would just add the other PC's hard drive as drive "D" to save on "conversion costs" .... a 5 minute job).
dude! that is not an upgrade today, if that hardware fails in a year your friend can hava a bad day trying to get parts...
also, a pc with that spects (used) will cost like 200 USD due import taxes, plus antivirus, office and your compant software, that will require time and money!!!
but I agree that options exist... some recomend to move to linux or like... (I don't, the time that will require just to teach the users will cost more that just buying new windows pcs... Time is money!)
|
|
|
|
|
Well said!
In our case it isn't Win 7 or Win 8 that is costly. It IS all the hardware we have to change out because the new versions of Windows don't have drivers for the equipment. $100 for Win 7 or 8 AND $10,000 for equipment. NOT a good business case!! Sorry, not going to happen in the foreseeable future!
|
|
|
|
|
If Win 7 and 8 "don't have the drivers", then you can install them yourself. You can retrieve them from your "other" OS if you don't have the distribution media.
And while Win 7 and 8 will upgrade any drivers it does have (possibly to an incompatible level), if you first install the older drivers and then "roll them back" when they are upgraded, then you are back in business.
I thought this was "obvious".
|
|
|
|
|
If this is so obvious please find us some 64 bit drivers for our Mitsubichi Dye Sub printers... And while you're at it how about some drivers for our photo processing equipment, circa 1995 MSDOS drivers which run nicely under Win XP.
We have the latest version of the Win XP drivers and the install media. They won't even install on Win 7 or 8.1!
Alternatively, you could just send us the $$$'s to buy the latest printers and peripheral equipment.
Glad it is so "obvious" to you...
|
|
|
|
|
If you can't get the drivers to run natively, then run a virtual machine.
I think you've about run out of excuses.
|
|
|
|
|
Why would anyone go to the bother of upgrading all their equipment to Win 7 or Win 8 to simply install a Win XP virtual machine and run it when we already have the hardware up and running Win XP.
What a stupid, computer geek idea! Have you EVER run a profitable company!?
|
|
|
|
|
You said your "XP drivers" won't install under Win 7 / 8.
I said they would with a VM. Period.
Your rant was not relevant since I did not say you should upgrade.
|
|
|
|
|
In hockey they refer to your response as a "deke". Nice try...
|
|
|
|
|
Don't follow hockey much ... too many goons.
|
|
|
|
|
nop, there are a lot of old good hardware that is not supported in new Windows versions... (a lot of industrial specialiced hardware!!!)
you can blame the manufacturer of the hardware for not upgrading the drivers but it's the same case of winXP not being supported anymore, the manufacturer want's you to buy the new hardware without reason, your old hardware still productive!!!
(you can't imgine how productive are those old Matrix Printers, you can also use Carbon paper!!!!)
|
|
|
|
|
I am staying with XP even at home for 3 reasons. First, cost of upgrading the hardware: Laptop requires at least another gig of RAM; desktop 1, 2 gigs or more; desktop 2 new CPU and so forth. Second, I have consulting clients who are running applications written using Visual Studio 2003. Neither Win 7 nor 8 will allow the installation of VS 2003. Upgrading several hundred thousand lines of VS2003, even to VS2010, is not a trivial undertaking. A third reason is common to many users: older peripheral devices for which there are probably no new drivers, for example: scanner, plotter, CNC machines, and various pieces of RS232 laboratory equipment.
Charles Wolfe
C. Wolfe Software Engineering
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
