|
Marc Clifton wrote: CP just doesn't address the same niche.
But why doesn't it address that niche? CP has been going a lot longer, has the whole article thing going for it, and has both forums and QA. So, why is SO the first port of call in Google, where CP barely gets a mention?
|
|
|
|
|
I feel that CP is more for articles, SO for Q&A.
If the CP community took a tougher stance on rubbish that appears in the Q&A like SO appear to do and changed the format slightly I think it would help.
However how to achieve that on both fronts I'm not quite sure.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: What went wrong here?
CP is about articles, not Q&A.
|
|
|
|
|
You might want to mention that to Chris. He seems to have allocated some time and energy to the forums and QA.
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been held a number of times. CP wants a more inclusive approach where low grade questions are tolerated (along with low grade answers). SO is a bit more selective I feel with questions and consequently there is less spam. The cabal of high ranking posters seeking points is not helping. I don't care how high their rank they mostly all post a great deal of crap to get there and their motives are completely transparent. About 50% of what is currently in the Q&A could be culled without any loss whatsoever.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
CP has never been the go-to source for short snippets and answers to 'how do I do this simple thing I forgot?' questions, which is what most of us need resources for. It's attempted to barge in on SO's domain with Q&A, but our Q&A is not a patch on SO and it doesn't have the Google karma either.
For more in-depth things and reading about new topics or expanding the mind, CP is far superior. But we don't need to do that as often.
|
|
|
|
|
The irony here, of course, is that Chris reportedly planned QA long before SO came on the scene. In fact, there was a fair bit of bad blood between the two sides when SO was launched.
|
|
|
|
|
Hand in your code project membership at the door. Security will see you out. Please don't attempt to contact any of us again. Your sort are not welcome round here anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
P0mpey3 wrote: Hand in your code project membership at the door.
 SO and CP are two very different services. It would be impossible to write articles on SO, for example.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm? What's that?
You'll never get very far if all you do is follow instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: use MSDN.
Don't do it, Marc! Nothing's worth that - nothing! 
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh c'mon Roger, it can't be that bad. Here, I'll show you`~~~CARRIER LOST
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
I just noticed a new customer has emailed me a scanned image of a spreadsheet (where he has printed and then written on the document) of a set of numbers (only about 300 total) needed for a one-time setup. I had asked for the spreadsheet to use for an import, something we do all the time and could have been done in 5 minutes...and this is what I get! Some users, I get a bad feeling about right off the bat, and this is one of them. It was confirmed in the first minute of conversation when he corrected my enunciation of the word 'elementary'...his version (the correct one) is to stress the 'tar' syllable. Then he apologized for correcting me, and gave me a lesson about how Northerners are more abrupt by nature. I pretended to sound interested and made sure to adjust my dialect and personality to match his. Oh well, during the time that I have been complaining about it, I could be halfway through manually entering the values into a spreadsheet! Just thought others might find amusing...probably not. Rant over. 
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
Just stick it back through a scanner and OCR and turn it back to a spreadsheet! 
|
|
|
|
|
That is somewhat like the "just delete it" response to spam. 
I'm retired. There's a nap for that...
- Harvey
|
|
|
|
|
How?
I thought it more like "The fly" where it goes back through the teleporter to undo the badness and get back what went in at the start. 
|
|
|
|
|
And it doesn't matter how much you wash yourself afterwards, you still feel dirty.
|
|
|
|
|
kmoorevs wrote: he corrected my enunciation of the word 'elementary'...his version (the correct
one) is to stress the 'tar' syllable
You should reply that actually the correct pronunciation, and spelling, of 'elementarie' is to stress all syllables equally as it is a Norman French word.
I hate English language pedants, the langue is too messed up to get pedantic about.
Just today someone told me you cant have 'hung' a man, he has to be 'hanged', because he read it in a dictionary. Complete bollocks. Its a weak/strong verb difference, that's all, like learnt/learned, wove/weaved etc.
You CAN split the infinitive and you can say 'john and me'. 
Anyway, rant over.
"The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s." climate-models-go-cold
|
|
|
|
|
What's perhaps most confusing about the English language is that there are two major ones. English and American.
There's 'color' and there's 'colour', there's 'center' and there's 'centre' etc.
I used to write 'color' and 'centre', now I know better than to put them in the same text
What I understand from a friend who studies English is that it's a language that is constructed of exceptions.
I wouldn't know them, I always thought English had very little grammar, or at least you don't really have to know about it to do it right.
And maybe I'm not doing it right at all 
Try German or French... Now those are horrible languages.
In German, for example, you have to know if a word is 'male', 'female' or 'neutral', der, das oder die. Dependent on the word and who you are talking about you use 'dem' or 'den' (and then there's a few more I think) and you can write 'sie' or 'Sie' (the capital gives it a different meaning)... 
And I understood it's still easy compared to the Slavonic languages, such as Czech where the 'your', 'his', 'her' part is included in the word. So 'his bike' and 'her bike' would both be one word that's spelled differently (something like 'biko' for 'his bike' or 'biku' for 'her bike' (for the record, that was gibberish))
Of course that's what they all say about Dutch too 
Do you know that (ancient) South Park song where Cartman sings about Kyle's mom who he thinks is a bitch? He sings it in different (gibberish) languages and the last language he sings is (supposed to be) Dutch. I always though it was Russian until I actually saw the episode. Apparently we talk like a records that played backwards And apparently I think that's how Russian sounds
It's an OO world.
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: Of course that's what they all say about Dutch too
You're from the Netherlands, you don't speak Dutch
Sander Rossel wrote: there's 'center' and there's 'centre' etc
I always thought there to be a different meaning to those two words:
center being the center of a object and centre being a place, guess I was wrong
modified 31-May-14 19:24pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Deketelaere wrote: You're from the Netherlands, you don't speak Dutch
I speak Netherlandish? Nah, I speak Dutch 
Tom Deketelaere wrote: I always thought there to be a different meaning to those two words:
center being the center of a object and centre being a place, guess I was wrong
I told you it was confusing. By complete coincidence this was just posted on 9gag[^] 
It's an OO world.
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: What's perhaps most confusing about the English language is that there are two
major ones. English and American.
THey are the same language with a few intentional spelling changes, but otherwise identical compared to the variability of English within England.
What is odd is Indian English, that has truly developed some odd words.
Sander Rossel wrote: Try German or French... Now those are horrible languages.
German is a nightmare, French, non, c'est facile. En fait je le trouve tres simple.
Dutch is pretty simple too, but what differentiates these from English is that there is no central govt body, or any body, that manages the language, that dictates its spelling, or its use. Instead English is defined by its use, thus there are truly no rules, and it will, as it has done, evolve to fit people needs with a freedom other languages can only envy. And that, coupled with its fundamental simplicity, is in part why it is so popular.
"The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s." climate-models-go-cold
|
|
|
|
|
Munchies_Matt wrote: French, non, c'est facile. En fait je le trouve tres simple.
Non?
I learned English as a second language by playing games and watching tv and I think I'm doing quite alright, so I guess it can't be that difficult
Unless you really get into the language (like study it), but that goes for any language I guess.
It's an OO world.
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Munchies_Matt wrote: the langue is too messed up to get pedantic about.
Yes, and the spelling is a bitch.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
Haha! That was actually spelt in the French way, 'langue' unintentionally!
"The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s." climate-models-go-cold
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
