|
I also noticed the same issue. All the links are pointing to "SMS notifications.....". That article has a very large file download count.
|
|
|
|
|
I updated one of my articles[^] last night, and was watching for it to come through on the C++ latest articles. But it never did although it was approved. Looking into the situation, it was tagged 'Windows, Dev, Intermediate, Visual Studio', and it was in the Articles » Languages » C / C++ Language » General section. Evidently your logic only puts things through to the 'new' listings by tags?
I've re-edited the article's tags to include 'C++' (and removed the VS and Windows) so hopefully it will appear correctly when it is reapproved, but the question is should the article's section somehow be incorporated into the Latest Article feeds?
|
|
|
|
|
Not a bad idea, but we do tend to work on the assumption that an author writing a C++ article would add C++ as a tag.
In any case I've added C++ as the default tag of the C++ section (and am giving myself an odd look as to why I didn't do that before)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
The Asp.Net web site where I originate by BLOG updated to Orchard CMS.
This caused 3 articles to be resubmitted to Code Project automatically. Someone approved them.
Now the code has the originally formatting which doesn't work here.
I couldn't find anyway to roll them back to the previous version. Is there a way to roll back to earlier versions?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually they are exact duplicates of their originals, so I simply deleted the duplicates (the new posts). Thank you kindly for reporting this!
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've rescued the formatting on the one, and fixed the images on another. I can see you working away at the third.
And once your technical blog entry has been approved, you can then delete it.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Sean.
>>I can see you working away at the third.
Unfortunately, I was unable to fix the third article.
Secret Covert Hush-Hush White Space in the DOM…EXPOSED![^]
I tried editing the article directly and copying the HTML to notepad, working on that and then pasting it back in. In both cases the article gets corrupted. Apparently I am too stupid to use the Code Project editor. Or perhaps there is another explanation.
>> And once your technical blog entry has been approved, you can then delete it.
That doesn't make sense to me. Hopefully, you can also fix the third article.
Thanks again,
Steve Wellens
|
|
|
|
|
I did indeed fix it. I am always happy to do so.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I see the same issue. 
|
|
|
|
|
As I told you in the question, I think that comes because a pair of <code></code> tags is not correctly matching. Or there is one <code> without a </code>
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello
I edited my article[^] by pasting html code in the new editor.
The preview had some problems:
. Some html comments appear in the previewed text.
. 'Span' tags appear in source code blocks.
. pictures does not display (wrong address ?).
I suggest to check these problems.
In the end, I have had to use the old editor, which worked fine.
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Christophe Bertrand wrote: In the end, I have had to use the old editor, which worked fine.
I recall that I had to fix the span problem for you (in a previous version of the article), even though you have used the old editor back then. Can you provide us the information you see here[^]?
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
The console is a black place [taken from Q&A]
How to ask a question
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for the last version. This time no problem with the old editor, maybe it has been fixed meanwhile.
I use FireFox 29.0.1 on Windows. For more informations, please give me an email address (private reply is enable below).
|
|
|
|
|
The information you provided should be sufficient. I'm not a CodeProject staff member, but Sean will take care of the problem once you emailed him what you have pasted.
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
The console is a black place [taken from Q&A]
How to ask a question
|
|
|
|
|
Could you please email me what you pasted? I'll take a look.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I noted that recently clicking on some of the links in my Reputation History item link me to this article
Adding SMS notifications to your Windows Azure projects[^]
It may be intersting to note that this article that I was directed to has exceptional download figure in hundred of thousands, but the view figure is less than 20 thousands.
|
|
|
|
|
 I was just going to write a similar post because I noticed the spike in the Reputation graph of the author of that article. There is definitely something wrong.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Team,
I normally bookmark all interesting articles and sometimes while looking for references, I go to my bookmarks and open articles from there. Lately, I have observed that when I open a bookmarked article, the "star" representing the bookmark on the right hand side of the article does not appear as solid. As a result, I often get confused, as to whether the article has been opened from bookmarks or not. Can you please look into this issue?
DNG
|
|
|
|
|
Showing an indication that an article has been opened from a bookmark list (as opposed to from anywhere else) isn't a feature we've implemented, nor, if I'm to be honest, is it something high on our priorities.
Sorry - I just can't see it as a killer feature.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
In my article: Considerations on Efficient use of LINQ Extension Methods[^] I tried to use < and > entities in the Summary ("1-line description") specifically:
IEnumerable<T>
but it ended up with just the IEnumerable
It appears as if the <T> was stripped.
Thoughts?
Or am I imagining the whole problem...
(I'm pretty sure I used the markup in that part of the submission wizard.)
A positive attitude may not solve every problem, but it will annoy enough people to be worth the effort.
|
|
|
|
|
The user details appear in a box on the left hand side now, instead of just above the user name.
[Edit]
Internet Explorer 9.0
[/Edit]
The signature is in building process.. Please wait...
|
|
|
|
|
I can't replicate. Can you post a screenshot?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Screen shot unfortunatly blocked by our system. Anyway it's looking strange..
The signature is in building process.. Please wait...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
