|
Will there be a nuclear option for the words "codez" and "plz"?
|
|
|
|
|
That's actually a required part of the spec.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
'Add to Dictionary':
- codez
- plz
- Asp.net
- aSP.Net
- AsP.nEt
|
|
|
|
|
My voat iz fer a kontezt.
Cuz, the codez and kommentz that ppl right should b ur choice 2 regul8, what, az owner of the boardz around hear, though im not sure.
Plz consider thiz a YEZ voat, so i then did the rite thing.
However, my voat's mileage may vary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
See reply[^]
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's automatic speech correction that he's after, not spell checking. So, you'd want to correct text speech from things like ur to your.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, and of your phrase "yeah, that means you lot," it doesn't work.
"yeah, that means the lot of you" is more accurate.
Though, that may get confused with "yeah, that means allot of you," which implies not the whole "lot of us," of which my using 'the whole "lot"' might further confuse others to discern I mean "a whole lot" which, like "allot of you," doesn't mean the whole "lot of you" that "lot" is describing, which is the whole of us.
So, now you (the singular "you," you being the reader, of which, when there is more than a singular "you" reader, collectively, all you readers would also be the "lot of you" readers, though not the lot of you the original "lot of you" denotes) know.
modified 18-Aug-14 13:38pm.
|
|
|
|
|
MacSpudster wrote: Oh, and of your phrase "yeah, that means you lot," it doesn't work.
It's technically correct and perfect grammar when speaking Australian.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
My point exactly!
The contest, er project specs, could include the option to qualify which language/nation the author is "typing" in. Or, perhaps, submit for 'inclusion' into a back-end repository of acceptable words and/or phrases.
Then again, there would likely be hourly, nay, minutely submissions of "Plz accept 'plz' as an acceptable word".
|
|
|
|
|
Oh great. We're going to have Mick arbitrate grammar rules, I just know it. All of us stupid "Mercans" are f***ed.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Gary R. Wheeler wrote: Oh great. We're going to have Mick arbitrate grammar rules, I just know it. All of us stupid "Mercans" are f***ed.
Absolutely spot on.
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
It wouldn't take me an hour to write a "Reject" button that sends an e-mail saying "Clean up your language use, or it won't be published".
Attempts to automate language corrections normally end up creating as many problems as they solve (e.g. how many amongst us have ever used "i" as a loop-control variable or a tag to indicate italicisation?)
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
If it were easy it wouldn't be a challenge.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
There's a bit of a killer crevasse between "challenge" and "life's work".
Human languages are just too damned complicated to handle with a computer without, at the very least, a several-year-old backprop routine.
You just can't treat correcting English like correcting a humongously simpler computer language.
Lookit:
With a good writer:
-- If your amendment is correct/appropriate, his response will be "Thanks!", because no-one understands snow-blindness better than an experienced writer.
-- If your amendment is incorrect/inappropriate, he probably won't say anything, but he'll take his work elsewhere, next time.
With a poor writer:
-- If your amendment is correct/appropriate, you'll at best get a "humph!" in reply.
-- If your amendment is incorrect/inappropriate, it'll escalate to a screaming fit before you can type a greengrocers' apostrophe.
Here be monsters, eh? The easiest person to turn into an enemy is the one who's not entirely sure what he's doing.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
You firing it up onto Github or something?
If so, I'll definitely throw a few hours at it 
|
|
|
|
|
Is it just me or is this just a semi-respectable way of getting us to do your work? 
"Gee Huck, Gee Becky... whitewashing this fence sure is fun!"
Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. ~ George Washington
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Mullikin wrote: Is it just me or is this just a semi-respectable way of getting us to do your work?
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Let's just remove the "semi-respectable" and be done with it, eh?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
The grammar Nazi in me would make it a three-strike rule.
And if you write "urgentz", the account gets suspended for a day. :-p
|
|
|
|
|
If you write "urgentz", we nuke your house from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
So "gimme code plz" will be auto-corrected to "Give me code please"?
That will be an improvement 
Seriously though, I wonder how much can really be corrected? Such a library has to be very 'smart' to fix some of the stuff I read on CP (luckily there's more good than bad though!).
If someone doesn't value grammar can they form correct sentences? im sure this sentence couldve been fixed. but this sentense may it can be fixed, srry for my bad english?
It's an OO world.
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
I was thinking we start simple.
"i have a problem. can someone help me?" goes to "I have a problem. Can someone help me?".
We then look to see common issues and do some simple stuff. cant => can't, Sql => SQL.
Treading softly. Keeping it simple.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
