|
I'm from here.[^]
Frankly I'm doing well to know the Romans existed.
My dad used to teach the kiddiewinks at the proto-borstal he used to teach at that the Romans and Greek used to fight over this[^]. Not one spotted the problem.
Alberto Brandolini: The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.
|
|
|
|
|
Keith Barrow wrote: Quid custodiet ipsos custodes?
I think that should be:
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes
|
|
|
|
|
Keith Barrow wrote: Quid custodiet ipsos custodes?
Custard covered custard for a pound?
|
|
|
|
|
We have a winner!
Alberto Brandolini: The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.
|
|
|
|
|
I love how quickly discussions shoot off, like elementary particles, into crazy spirals in unexpected directions.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I actually only watched a few episodes of Elementary[^]  . After that the guy started to annoy me.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Yummy, I'm buying!
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
But seriously, yes there should be / could be a list of approvers shown when a moderator views an article. It might just help.
Except for the people who approved my articles, they'll just get hunted down and shot like vermicelli.
|
|
|
|
|
Why do you shoot vermicelli?
Seriously: has anyone, when you've had them over for dinner, commented on the buckshot in their Sukhi Sevaiyan?
You may want to rethink your approach.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
My cookin' is top drawer. Except last night. That was erm, well I :thought: I had some cooked chicken but it turned out to be ![Sheep | [baah]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/sheep.gif)
Tonight is definitely chicken. I think.
|
|
|
|
|
|
How very dare you!
Moroccan Lamb with Minted Couscous not good enough for you?
{Admittedly, I thought it was a chicken stew I was defrosting. This is why I believe in labelling left-overs before putting them in the freezer. I believe in it, I just don't do it.]
|
|
|
|
|
No, it is not. I want
White and green asparagus with creamed morels
Maine lobster creamed with leeks and tapioca topped with osetra caviar
Almond crusted Soft shell crabs in a coconut citrus glaze
Roasted Alaskan Halibut with lobster water cooked red lentils with a fricassee of shiitakes and salsify and an apple glaze
Oh, and Twinkie for dessert!
|
|
|
|
|
I've put up a survey here[^]
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, democracy ! 
Given: only if you decide to follow the survey results...
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
I voted to publish only your name and vote 
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
Rage wrote: Ah, democracy !
Given: only if you decide to follow the survey results...
Perhaps a Republic then.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps make the votes on that survey public aswell?
|
|
|
|
|
Let's have a vote on that!
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
I've just noticed your survery text:
I'd still have voted yes - I normally comment unless spam or plagiarised.
My idea was to see who'd approved an article post approval, in an attempt to deter people approving guff and allow a certain amount of self-policing. The other worry is, if the current approvals are to be visible during the approval process it might sway people, e.g. if OG has approved, I respect his opinion, so I'll approve type mentality.
Alberto Brandolini: The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.
|
|
|
|
|
Keith Barrow wrote: My idea was to see who'd approved an article post approval
Ah, I missed this, sorry.
But...not sure it'll do what you think it'll do. As soon as an article is approved it is no longer available for moderation: a refresh or new load of the article will no longer show the approval widget.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I can imagine that they mean something similar to when something was reported / nuked: Message closed because "XXX", "YYY", "ZZZ" reported it due to blah blah blah"
But more like: Article approved by: XXX, YYY, ZZZ...
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Keith Barrow wrote: if OG has approved, I respect his opinion, so I'll approve
Ah.
Hadn't thought of that...so no pressure then, eh?
You looking for sympathy?
You'll find it in the dictionary, between sympathomimetic and sympatric
(Page 1788, if it helps)
|
|
|
|
|
It's all right. I'll balance him out. I don't respect your opinion at all.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
