|
Its not available any more so i can't show you that post, but i am almost sure it was not a question. Even if that is the case then it needs to be changed i think.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
I'm with you on that - all the moderation should not be awarded (even to with a single point)...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Do you have a link? If someone posts a question on an article and you reply then the reply is, by default, set as an "answer". Since the post is on an article (and not a general discussion forum) it's considered a programming forum. Hence you get the points for posting an answer on a programming forum.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed that the same happens in the Article Writing forum; if your answer gets upvoted there, you get 10 points with the message "Post a Programming Forum Answer", while the Article Writing forum is not a Programming Forum.
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
I am observing in CP in recent days, some people are complaining about "Down Voting". Some people are suggesting, remove the down vote button from QA section as like discussion forums.
My suggestion is, the down vote button should only visible, when user hit the "Up Vote" button. Means user can only down vote such item(s) which he/she has up voted. If user does not like the Answer/Post, he can just undo his "Up Vote". The points of down vote should be deducted the same added point after Up Voting.
Sometimes, I like the code snippet/link and up voted the answer, but when I visit the actual link or after trying the code, I found, it is not working as exptecd, then I can undo my "up vote". This can be useful for other developers.
___ ___ ___
|__ |_| |\ | | |_| \ /
__| | | | \| |__| | | /
|
|
|
|
|
Sanjay K. Gupta wrote: I found, it is not working as exptecd,
Then don't vote until you have checked first. This whole issue around up and down voting has been discussed too many times; just enjoy the site and stop worrying about it.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: just enjoy the site and stop worrying about it
+5!
Oh, wait a minute... 
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
If an answer is bad then you should be able to mark it as bad. Just undoing an upvote has the same effect as not voting on it at all, which removes the concept of an answer being so wrong that it's dangerous. This is why downvotes have to continue.
|
|
|
|
|
Sanjay K. Gupta wrote: remove the down vote button from QA section as like discussion forums.
Do you mean the 1 star to 5 star voting? Or am I just blind to where the downvote button is?
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I've had this and I have only signed up. Somebody clearly with know knowledge of coding or someone who is jealous that another users answer holds more merit to being accurate than theirs.
My suggestion to this; is to give points to users who vote accurately to helpful suggestions. Votes could be pending review from admins who specialize in whatever language tag the question it for, and if a user who voted votes accurate, and their votes are approved by an admin, they get points for it.
The reason i am suggesting this; as par the sites methods is to provide users/readers with knowledge and accurate answers. If an accurate answer gets down-voted, a reader will be reluctant to use that example.
Does this not defeat the purpose of the site? What do you think?
Regards,
CodingK
|
|
|
|
|
 I see you have answered 4 QA questions and only one had a 1 vote. That same question also had a 4 and 5 vote. One down vote is hardly abuse.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Ryan, It's not just that post where I received the down-vote, yes that is what sparked the suggestion. But I am reading posts for the past few days that are perfectly fine and yet; get down-voted. Anyway, I've passed on my thoughts on the issue. It would do no harm to moderate votes in my opinion. Lets hope for a resolution. Eh?
Regards,
CodingK
|
|
|
|
|
Who has the time to moderate the votes? It's hard enough to keep on top of moderating articles, never mind trying to get on top of the votes. I'm sorry, but to me, this idea is impractical.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: but to me, this idea is impractical.
+1 to that.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
We're not moderating votes. Therein lies the path to madness.
The most likely candidate for voting 2.0 is we simply open it up, show who voted, and let the vote wars go nucular!
(OK, maybe not)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Well it would make for interesting reading.
|
|
|
|
|
Is there any way to get the files from this workspace?
https://workspaces.codeproject.com/aelij/using-raw-input-from-c-to-handle-multiple-keyboards
Unfortunately I didn't receive any email from CP saying they are shutting down Workspaces, and I don't have another copy of the code.
Any help would be appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll ask Kamil but the chances are slim. We had notices up for 2 months advising members.
Was this workspace connected to an article?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
In that case the downloads for the article should reflect the code that was in the workspace. Update the workspace and the article's code was also updated automatically.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
This was not my article, the workspace was forked.
|
|
|
|
|
On the CodeProject API, I can access the APIs (except My) without providing credentials/an access token. I read nowhere that you can, so: is this by design?
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
This is why the API isn't public yet 
We're still completing the APIs and the docs. I'll send you an email when they are fully baked.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Alright, thanks!
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
