|
This[^] spammer is spamming some GPS tracking service, here[^] and here[^]
The spam "question" is gone now, can be viewed here[^]
You can lead a developer to CodeProject, but you can't make them think.
The Theory of Gravity was invented for the sole purpose of distracting you from investigating the scientific fact that the Earth sucks.
modified 20-Sep-14 9:26am.
|
|
|
|
|
The answer here[^] looks suspiciously like spam to me. The member[^] does not hide that she works for the company and has written product showcase articles. But the posting of links for commercial products is not generally acceptable. What say you?
You can lead a developer to CodeProject, but you can't make them think.
The Theory of Gravity was invented for the sole purpose of distracting you from investigating the scientific fact that the Earth sucks.
|
|
|
|
|
After 6 hours the answer gone and her profile looks innocent...As she is new we may give her an other chance...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did not see this one reported before, This[^] is apparently just starting out I his spamming career, only one so far, here[^]
You can lead a developer to CodeProject, but you can't make them think.
The Theory of Gravity was invented for the sole purpose of distracting you from investigating the scientific fact that the Earth sucks.
|
|
|
|
|
Wes Aday wrote: only one so far,
Doesn't matter. Prevention is better than cure.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
10th kick applied.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
This[^] member does nothing but post a link to some quiz web site, as far as I can see. Looks more like site driving spam to me.
Messages[^]
You can lead a developer to CodeProject, but you can't make them think.
The Theory of Gravity was invented for the sole purpose of distracting you from investigating the scientific fact that the Earth sucks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Content Removed
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
modified 19-Sep-14 14:56pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure if that would qualify as spam. As far as I can see there's only a link to the original blog (as this is a blog consumed by CP).
Probably the author just isn't aware that the same link he included in the blog is automatically included in the description by CP blog reader. 
|
|
|
|
|
I updated the original post. Well, he is the same member who has wasted his day updating and inserting links to his old Articles. Take a look at my recent messages below.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
Thanks
Do not forget to comment and rate the article if it helped you by any means.
modified 19-Sep-14 8:20am.
|
|
|
|
|
How can an article from 2004 have been copied from a StackOverflow thread posted in 2011? 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I have removed the message for now.My bad I didn't noticed that.
Will have to verify again.Till then user is safe.
Thanks
Do not forget to comment and rate the article if it helped you by any means.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
Thanks
Do not forget to comment and rate the article if it helped you by any means.
modified 19-Sep-14 8:20am.
|
|
|
|
|
I can't see a publication date on the ecomputernotes link - are you sure it was published before the CodeProject article?
EDIT: The domain appears to have been registered in 2011[^], so I don't see how an article from 2004 could have been copied from that source.
The slideshare link seems to have been published in 2014 - ten years after the CodeProject article.
The classle link doesn't seem to have any connection to the article.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I have removed the message for now.My bad I didn't noticed that.
Will have to verify again.Till then user is safe.
Thanks
Do not forget to comment and rate the article if it helped you by any means.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
