|
Spammer[^]
I'll nuke the message because it's in Bugs and Sugs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Messages gone 
Member needs to be kicked of!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member evicted.
Oh, and please don't post the title of spam posts, it confuses the spam filter system that Chris put in place. It also gives the spammers some help in that the message is linked to with the text they use to get the messages ranked higher on search engines.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
---
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
---
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much.
Only I cannot understand how the link to the post can confuse anything and what exactly do you suggest to post? Some may need some evidence of the abuse. Also, I don't believe the title can do any harm.
Happy New Year!
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Chris has a number of reasons for that, but I cannot be arsed to look for the post he made about it right now (going to bed soon). From what I remember, bots index these links, and they show up in search results. They also give spammers more visibility in those results because of the keywords in the title.
Just use the URL itself as the text, or something like 'Message' or 'Messages' (for the user's message list). I use the second way myself. I also use 'Luser' to link to the (l)user account.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
---
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
---
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for the explanation; it makes sense.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
I reported one more by editing the same post. Please act on that one, too.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Both gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 5-Jan-15 17:58pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes (banghead)...
|
|
|
|
|
gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think this is a planned operation going on since morning. They have been regularly opening different accounts and posting such sh*ts.
I think Original Griff put up a nice thought of having some Coding captcha for opening account, so that somewhat these kinda spammers be avoided.
Just a thought.
|
|
|
|
|
Suraj Sahoo | Coding Passion wrote: having some Coding captcha for opening account
And what if the account are opened by humans and then used with bots?
Besides, copy + paste is not so difficult, so once the message is done...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As previously reported here[^] the article lacks proper credits.
However the article got through so it is now here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Just gave the last report, it's now closed.
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
I have taken a look in the revisions. The first version was from a CP-Editor. I guess the user tried to fool the system getting it posted by someone of the staff (when they click publish, contributions get through without moderation).
So I guess: We nuked the first one. He posted somewhere else and someone from CP brought it back from Limbo
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
That would explain the situation, good find! I was feeling somewhat similar as Bill Murray in Groundhog Day[^] 
|
|
|
|
|
Nah, it happens. Is the same with changes of cathegory, when the Editor has a "playing day" then it doesn't keep the current cathegory, so when any Editor bypassing moderation make some changes, the previous Tip/Trick becomes magically an article and we start another time
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
