|
.... top of this forum(Like in lounge). Include this page[^] in that thread. I remember there's a thread in past.
Too many 'Delete my post' threads here recently.
|
|
|
|
|
You mean you want an FAQ sticky thread? I'd prefer not. I'll add an FAQ entry to the forum abstract instead.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Dear admins
Could you please delete my account for me ? I heard this is the only way possible for me to delete this account.
Regards
Ex-Developer
|
|
|
|
|
Go to your name at the top right corner of the site. Choose "My Settings" from the menu, and select the Close my account setting at the right hand side. Finally, click Save my Settings and I believe your account will be closed.
|
|
|
|
|
That doesn't work. Try it if you don't believe me. 
|
|
|
|
|
Less than half-an-hour ago I had just finished the third edit of my response to the OP with revised code that met their requirements: [^].
And, ba-boom, the question is removed. fyi: this was the OP's first ever post on CodeProject.
Yes, I can still see my last revision of my response here: [^].
I'm sorry, but I am not willing to spend time answering questions in a way that is based on my own commitment to a certain level of quality, and being responsive to posters, particularly newcomers, on QA, in order to see this happen time, and time, again.
This, in combination with the abuse of the rep system, and the frequent gratuitous sneers and insults doled out every day to QA questioners, is just a no-win situation.
imho, this situation is not healthy for the wonderful, vibrant, pro-social, community that CodeProject is.
thanks, Bill
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
modified 25-Jan-15 6:00am.
|
|
|
|
|
To be honest, I did voted that question as no-question AFTER reading your solution and the comments on it...
The reason is that, IMHO, in this case you turned the 'wonderful, vibrant, pro-social, community that CodeProject is' into a code service...
OP didn't got nothing except a solution and for me is less than nothing in these cases...
I'm sorry to make you feel 'IInsignificant' and believe me that nothing personal involved in it...
It is nothing more than the clash of opinions on QA questions - and I too have my answered questions that were removed...
I want to tell you that on the professional (and also on the online-personal) level, I will be sorry not seeing you around QA and at all...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
So, Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter decides that another member is doing something he thinks is not right, and then, instead of reporting the member's behavior as "abuse," closes the thread ?
So, said Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter, ignoring the fact that two MVP's posted code on that thread, decides that first-time poster Muthukumar-K-MK should have his post removed ?
I consider the behavior of Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter in this matter to be a form of serious abuse of CodeProject, and I note that said Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter frequently posts code himself.
I must ask: who is Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter to play "god" ?
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: CodeProject is' into a code service...
Seriously? This was the reason for deleting the question.
First and foremost, he was a newbie, he posted in correct forum( welcome change!!). Next his question was not bad by any standards.
You are not "Sheriff" to make that call to delete it. You can leave approriate comment and give your reason or discuss it here.
Bill gave a valuable answer and this would have helped all and other future coders.
Whats up with trigger friendly fingers. Lets show some restraint
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
I think you (and Bill too - more understandably) got a bit too fat...
I'm not 'God' or 'Sheriff', and I didn't deleted/closed the question - I have no that authority!!!
All I did is reporting the question as 'Unclear or incomplete', it closed because I wasn't the only one who thought so...
With all the respect to you and Bill I hold myself the right to do so, when I'm think this is proper...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
My only grievance is the reason you gave for closure. You said that this site is not a "code service".
'Unclear or incomplete' option was not used in the right spirit. There was other ways to put your point after seeing that few of them have answered it.
Idea of CP is to encourage more coders to ask help and get help.
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
super wrote: 'Unclear or incomplete' option was not used in the right spirit.
That's a clear statement and I'm ready to accept, that I did a mistake - mea culpa will do it?
However from here to all the accusations I got, just because I came forward to discuss the subject, I can't see the connection...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
I have nothing to comment on intention or attitiude cos I do not know anybody at a personal level.
But for the above scenario , You have responed to my reasoning and thats more than enough for me and its a closed issue
Its to time to move on.
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
How about, rather than a blanket removal of questions, we try and help the OP to revise their question in a more appropriate form. I'm getting the impression from this thread that the nuclear option was the first option.
|
|
|
|
|
My vote came AFTER there were several comments on the question to improve and also AFTER OP commented on Bill's first version of his answer...
As you know we need 3 votes (I was the first) to close a question and the votes are bounded to that version of the question, so OP had the (at least theoretical) opportunity to response and improve AND REMOVE the votes...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
How long between the first request to change, and the downvotes? This theoretical ability is absurd. Suppose that someone posts a question at the end of their workday and they come in the following morning, all fresh faced and eager to see what the responses are to their work question. Now imagine whether or not that person will ever come back if the response to their first ever question here is to close it.
Sadly, I see the same sense of self important "patrolling" going on in QA that I see in SO - the precise reason I stopped helping out in SO, because noobs were treated with contempt. We all have to remember that we all started out once, and that it took the help of people with patience to improve. If we shut down noobs because they don't meet a standard they aren't aware of, then we might as well close up shop altogether.
Perhaps the comments to change the details should also include some instructions on how to change the question, and what is expected of a good question. Help the OP to see what the problem is and give them a reasonable chance to change their post. It's all about taking that little bit extra effort to help out. As it is, you've just lost Bill who has far more patience with the people who reply in QA than I do. How long before all that's left are people who are pure rep-trolls, and who will post any old crap just to get some points?
|
|
|
|
|
With all the respect I can't see how you came to the conclusion that I'm a 'self important', 'pure rep-troll' who 'just lost Bill'...
However to the point of it...If I think about the true essence of your words, the 'Unclear or incomplete', 'Off topic' and 'Not a question' reports are have to be gone, or changed a way to force comment...
For now I'm using them as a tool next to comments, when I find it proper, with no second thought...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Did I say you were rep-trolling? No, I didn't. You did lose Bill though.
The point I was making is that once all others have been driven out, the only one's who will be left in there are the people who think it's their duty to patrol the place, and the only one's who will be answering are people who drop in and out to amass points without caring about whether they are adding value.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete, I'm so with you and Bill on this.
I can't say I made a conscious decision to stop answering in QA. I just don't feel like it anymore.
I had spent some time answering a question that was poorly worded, but it was clear to me. Quite simply, if there's an answer then I can't see any reason why a question should be deleted. In my case the question was the 3rd or 4th time I was at the receiving end of he who shall not be named's brand of vitriol. My understanding is that Griff stopped for similar reasons. As I see it, there are two possible outcomes: The one you outline or; The rules change.
I don't see myself wandering back to QA any time soon.
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Phil, while I have no "agenda" that any CP member should take an active role in QA, I find the fact that you, and others, including the likes of Marc Clifton, have "bounced off" QA for one reason or another disturbing, and feel that is a loss for the CP community as a whole.
I truly hope we (CP collectively including staff) can identify any structural problems with QA and do what's possible (without creating some surveillance-state chimera) to make every member who decides to participate "at home."
cheers, Bill
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Bill,
I've posted on other threads about QA, including one or two that you've initiated. I've shared my thoughts on what I think QA should be/could be. I just don't agree with those that are trying to make it a competitor to SO, SO owns that space.
The biggest and most opinionated bully made MVP this year (he may have been in previous years too). I guess I just don't like bullies, I was bullied at school and as an adult I consider it my duty to stand up to them!
I retire in 9 weeks. I've been a member for quite a few years (mainly lurking as I didn't have the time). Things are winding down at work, so I've been a lot more active in the past few months. I'm not sure if I'll be an active member once I've hung up my boots, so I don't feel justified in campaigning strongly. I've shared my opinions and it's up for the community to act or not. I believe that, at some level, QA is broken; although there are many who ask and are given, there is some proportion that is not served well.
Chris and others on here have my deepest respect. It would be unfair to name names as I'd be bound to miss some. At this point I feel it right to take a step back and let those others take up the fight.
Cheers, right back at you, Phil.
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
May I remind you of your own words:
"To be honest, I did voted that question as no-question AFTER reading your solution and the comments on it... The reason is that, IMHO, in this case you turned the 'wonderful, vibrant, pro-social, community that CodeProject is' into a code service... OP didn't got nothing except a solution and for me is less than nothing in these cases..." This indicates that your reason for removing the post was because you did not like my behavior, and you used your (evidently) psychic powers to decide the OP didn't get anything out of it.
So, you ignored the fact that other CodeProject members thought enough of the question to post code, that there was some interaction between the OP and other members, and just decided to nuke the thread.
How is it that you are so sure that newcomer Muthukumar-K-MK might not have turned out, in the future, to be an excellent CodeProject member ?
I think until you get clear about what your role as a CodeProject member is, you should abstain from voting.
This behavior of yours is a disgrace. And your attitude, as evinced by your mocking repetition of my words about CodeProject ("you turned the 'wonderful, vibrant, pro-social, community that CodeProject is' into a code service") is just beneath contempt.
You were "man enough" to take public responsibility for your action; I'd like to see you equally take responsibility for the consequence of your action.
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
First of all I did not ignored the fact that you responded to OP - in fact the response of OP to your code and the total ignorance of the comments were parts of my decision...However in my vote has nothing global and/or personal about/against you or OP. My opinion is totally in that context of the question and even there it is only an opinion...
An for the consequences - I'm here and will face them too. I didn't do what I'm done out of evil thoughts...
(As for the quoting part. I see that this was hard on you, but on that you have to believe me - not really have, but I have no choice to say it otherwise - but was no mockery intended, and as I'm reading it now again I can't see that mockery...Remember that I'm not a native English and I read and write these sentences in an other language, before translating them)
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Bill,
I can understand your frustration. I hope you don't get this bad, but I think it is time to let this thread go. Note: I don't mean the point raised in the thread, I mostly agree with you.
But, to be honest, I think you are not going to get anything else than increase your frustration or have a not so productive discussion. My advice... have a tee or a walk, calm down and have a while in the lounge to relax. It is not worth to get mad. [Joke] Besides, you need to keep an eye on your blood pressure. At your age... you know   [/Joke]
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I appreciate the ("blessed are the peacemakers") "spirit" of your remarks, but let me assure you that my blood pressure has been, and is, fine 
While it is not "pleasant" to have said what I have said on this thread, what I have said has been said "dispassionately" ... whether you believe that, or not: well, I have no choice there, do I ?
Never once have I imagined that anyone on this thread, or anyone on CP, is other than a deeply spiritual human being: to object to behaviorr is not to imply "condemning" the total character of a person.
Conflict is not necessarily unhealthy, if the wounds are not mortal.
cheers, Bill
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
