|
Nah, you wouldn't program "Hello World" for those - more like "Hello Sh*tty" 
GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)
|
|
|
|
|
Please remove that link : The examples to download contain trojans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If that's not hyperbole, Osmo's gone even more insane than I thought possible. 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
The Osmosian thingy! 
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah man, I still get a kick out of it.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Heres a non traditional Hello World from BrainF**k[^]
Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians.
Help end the violence EAT BACON
|
|
|
|
|
Malbolge[^] didn't have one for a long time (compared to reasonable languages anyway). It does now, but it's so hard to program in that initially no one really knew what to do with it.
There doesn't seem to be a Hello World in Jot[^], or perhaps I could not find it. It's not clear when a Jot program would be "a hello world program" anyway because it can't print anything and there are no strings, so the best you could do is evaluate to a value that somehow represents "hello world", but it wouldn't be recognizable.
Less interestingly, I have not coded Hello World in most of the proof-of-concept languages that I've written compilers for, and I imagine the same goes for many other people and their creations.
|
|
|
|
|
This?[^] - could be conisdered a programming language, defined structures, loops etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not counting either - the Hello World is clearly stitched in, not part of the pattern. 
|
|
|
|
|
New hobby Keith?
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
My first thought was "who'd write a hello world program in Prolog?" A quick web search turned up clickety[^]. Then I thought "surely not Occam?", but that's there also.
The link has lots of code for writing "Hello World". It might even make a good permanent link to publish on QA! 
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
Have you got a link to programs to do "Goodbye Cruel World"? It might fit QA better... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Something along the lines of a dos command "Format me"? How about "Set me = Nothing" (which, of course, would be useless for this purpose in a VB6 class)?
I'm not sure if they'd work, but I'm too scared to try.
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
C-3PO says he was never greeted by a binary vaporator.
|
|
|
|
|
Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote: Is there any programming language that hasn't had this program written?
So many programming languages have been created over the years, it's difficult to say for sure. It's possible of course, but it does look unlikely.
We might as well ask, what kind of language couldn't have a "Hello World" program written for it? Given that the purpose of the program is to display the words "Hello World" on the screen, the only possibility I can think of is a language that worked exclusively on devices that didn't have a screen or other text-capable output device – some sort of programming language for industrial robots, perhaps? Though even the Processing language used in the Arduino platform has one.
"Whereas smaller computer languages have features designed into them, C++ is unusual in having a whole swathe of functionality discovered, like a tract of 19th century Africa."
-- Verity Stob
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/05/05/cplusplus_cli/
|
|
|
|
|
String Theorists write "Hello, Alternately Dimensioned Universe" in ADU#*!. The string "World" results in an Ambiguous Reference error.
cat fud heer
|
|
|
|
|
At the local used book store yesterday I paged through an old book called, Amiga C For Beginners (Dirk Schaun), published in 1990. Yes, an old how to program the Amiga computer with C book.
The first program looked like:
#include <stdio.h>
void main()
{
printf("Hello, I am here!");
}
Still A Valid Program
It is interesting that the code is still valid on my current computer these many years later (25).
Art stands the test of time.
Internet Archive Is Amazing
I decided to google the book's name and was amazed that it has been digitized and made available online at (link is the page in the book with that first program):
https://archive.org/stream/1990-schaun-dirk-amiga-c-for-beginners#page/n23/mode/2up[^]
|
|
|
|
|
It's called ANSI C, it is a standard and that's what standards are for. 
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
den2k88 wrote: ANSI C, it is a standard and that's what standards are for
Yeah, it's nice when standards actually work. 
|
|
|
|
|
They can't kill C / C++
They try, but they just can't kill the speedy beast.
All attempts to make programming computers such an experience that you need not know the computer you are programming for results in unacceptable overhead somewhere.
Long live the dangling pointer.
|
|
|
|
|
Ron Anders wrote: All attempts to make programming computers such an experience that you need not know the computer you are programming for
In fact that's the main problem. While I admit there is need of at least some technology with a high level of abstraction to ease distribution between different platforms I'm aware that these technologies shouldn't be used for anything. They are a powerful tool, and every powerful tool, like explosives, should be used by highly skilled practitioners after having discerned if it is the case of using it.
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
den2k88 wrote: They are a powerful tool, and every powerful tool, like explosives, should be used by highly skilled practitioners after having discerned if it is the case of using it.
Truth that comes only from many years of experience.
|
|
|
|
|
Y'all must be one of those higher generation language coders.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
