|
Dan Neely wrote: elephanting stupid
...or maybe we considered that we wanted to have a quick list of "acknowledged" and "In Progress" on the page and we felt that that having the LHS menu and the quick list would make the forum width too narrow in fixed-width view, and given that the forums were also accessible via the dropdown that it made sense to sacrifice it.
Tomayto / tomahto.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Added back.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
That's a different menu to the other forums! 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I think you got the wrong menu. We need the one to other forums! (Like the menu in the Lounge)
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
---
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
---
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Brisingr Aerowing wrote: We need the one to other forums
Wrong... you don't need anything. You just want it, but it is/was not needed at all.
I actually liked more the previous version without it. You could click on "community" and go back to the lounge, "Ask a question" and go to the active QA List and for the rest just 1 sec more opening the dropdown menus on the top.
Now the B&S Forum looks like too small and the layout get messed up in long threads
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I can see it both ways. Let's give this a try for a bit.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
you were faster. I delete my direct answer to your previous message.
Chris Maunder wrote: Let's give this a try for a bit.
OK
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi mates,
dind't quite know where to ask, but since several days i don't get the notifications left of my username. Is this a bug or did i somehow change that in my profile settings?
I liked that i could see who answered to one of my messages.
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
modified 28-Jan-15 4:54am.
|
|
|
|
|
You had
Send me an e-mail if someone replies to the message
Allow private email replies to the message
both unchecked. Fixed.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Oh dear...
Thanks for that
i feel dumb now 
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
When you are writing it, if you try to set up a title such as:
List<T> - What's that all about?
As soon as you exit the "title text" area, the HTML tags are swallowed, and the title appears to be:
List - What's that all about?
So, you sigh, go back to it and change the text to:
List<T> - What's that all about?
And now the title looks right on the authoring page.
List<T> - What's that all about?
But then you go to the preview page, and the title shows the HTML encode characters:
List<T> - What's that all about?
It's not a big problem, but it could confuse a noob...particularly since most of them don't seem to find the "Preview" button anyway... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I'm on it.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I remember the same in QA (I can't find the report...) when HTLM like tags are only seen when you are inside the question, but in the list it vanished...
(Does it mean you back to serious work?)
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
A debugging session took me into the MS reference sources, and showed me something I should have known, but didn't - so I started a quick article on why it matters. (The title has changed already, and the article itself is in "pause" mode waiting a couple of days for me to review it before I hit the "publish" button)
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed. Available soon.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I really like the way the forums are (under normal layout settings) however when there is a post I clearly have no interest in (such as the CCC or the MQOTD or ...) I skip these posts.
But the reply's are still there, taking up space.
Would it be possible to have a sort off collapse button (next to the pin button or so) that collapses the thread?
I know there is the 'Thread view' layout but I don't really like that one 
Added bonus would be if a posts gets collapsed other posts (or reply's) get added to the bottom of the page to reach the 'per page' count again. (that might not be possible but ...)
Nothing major, a nice to have but I can live without it
Tom
modified 27-Jan-15 7:23am.
|
|
|
|
|
A feature that I like in Facebook is the ability to stop seeing top level messages from certain people. If we could "block" certain posters, this would be handy.
|
|
|
|
|
+1 on that
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
Would be handy as well.
But just because I don't want to see the ccc en such doesn't mean I don't want to see other posts by that member.
Hence the 'as well' part .
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Deketelaere wrote: But the reply's are still there, taking up space.
Hi Tom, I find this a bit confusing: yes, the replies are there in the sense that your browser has loaded them (I assume they are not "lazy-loaded"), but if you are using the Thread-View, you don't have to see them.
cheers, Bill
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
From what I understood from his post (and if I may) - I think he means a "Collapse" button on a parent message which will collapse all its children while using the Normal layout. So even if the children are already rendered, they will simply be collapsed.
If you prefer to see the messages along with their replies (as in the Normal layout - which I believe most of us do), the problem with the Thread view is that you still have to navigate to a separate page in order to see the children messages.
Your time will come, if you let it be right.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Agent_007,Agent__007 wrote: If you prefer to see the messages along with their replies (as in the Normal layout - which I believe most of us do),
While I would give the premise "100% of 'us' believe the way we prefer things defines 'normal'," 100 to 1 odds as reality, I wonder about what the percentage of Lounge-lizards using thread-view might be.
In "Normal" view what I observe is the thread-start visible, and replies showing title-only ... originally.
cheers, Bill
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: the thread-start visible, and replies showing title-only
Exactly, and the OP's suggestion is to be able to collapse those "title-only" replies.
This would be quite handy IMHO if one does not intend to read the replies at all given the parent thread (and of course the number of replies (as they still take up some space even in the "title-only" view) for a decently popular thread).
Your time will come, if you let it be right.
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: I find this a bit confusing
You'r probably not the only one, I'v been told before that I'm not always clear in my explanations
It's basically as Agent_007 said.
I prefer (by far) to use the 'normal' layout setting.
But under that setting the reply's are always visible and taking up space, I don't mind this as a default but would like to have the option to collapse (or hide) those reply's for the posts I choose.
Anyway Agant_007 probably said it better so'll refer to his reply
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 28-Jan-15 17:25pm.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
