|
|
It seems that I had a multi-threading issue in the Spam filter that is too embarrassing to even describe.
However, I have repaired the issue, and Chris will soon, or is deploying the change.
I think that it came to light on the weekend because so many of us developers don't have a life and all decided to post a lot at the same time as we were getting a bunch of Spam.
Hopefully, everything will be smooth from now on. (laughing as I say it  )
Matthew
|
|
|
|
|
If you had problems in understanding multithreading you could have asked in the forums 
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
And that message would have gone to moderation.. 
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Folks,
Still can't reach the code for ASP.NET Multiple File Upload With Drag & Drop and Progress Bar Using HTML5[^] at http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?aid=460142&av=669590[^]
The author sent me a different link but that only went to another article in VB that shows a rather simple version of drag and drop capability. I was looking for the much larger version that provides more details of his chunking method and how the author got it to work in IE 10, a difficult achievement.
Again the original links in the old article to the code don't work and the link to a newer version of the article doesn't work either.
Any help you can provide greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately this article has been deleted, so *waves hand* "this isn't the source code you're looking for."
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
What are the reasons an article gets deleted? Did it not meet standards? Did the author ask that it be taken down for business reasons? Why would you leave the old material online if the backup code is no longer available? Could i get the old code from a historical location?
|
|
|
|
|
There are a variety of possible reasons. Sometimes an author deletes their own article for their own reasons. Supposing that's the case, it would be against their wishes for us to continue sharing code they no longer want public.
What you are looking at is a version of an article. The only way to get that link is going into the revision history, which you should not even be able to see if the article is deleted.
Could you please let me know how / where you got that link? If there's a loophole we haven't considered that would be most helpful.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
All I did was search for html5 drag and drop capability for uploads or something like that and the article appeared. After reading and reviewing it, I tried to download the code at the links on the page and of course none of the links worked as you already know. Disappointed but I can imagine many reasons the article was deleted. Thanks for your time.
|
|
|
|
|
Those lucky messages that survive the moderation displays age from the release date and not from the original creation date, but in the list of siblings according the original post date...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: Those lucky messages that survive the moderation displays age from the release date
This was done because we decided a message was "posted" when it was released, not when it was written and held in the pending queue.
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: but in the list of siblings according the original post date...
List of siblings? Not sure what you mean.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: My post is 'younger' than that of OG (because it went into moderation), but still listed before (it was truly posted before)...It confusing
Fixed (for the future)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think so - thanks mate, Chris has dealt with it - hopefully Ive helped her and not stuffed up anything
|
|
|
|
|
It's back in the pending queue and will be available soon
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
thanks - wasn't sure how to help her - next time she can do her own barking
|
|
|
|
|
I posted a reply in the lounge and there was no error, but the message did not show up in the thread. I tried it again and got the same result. On checking my messages, it shows the two messages as 'not publicly visible'.
Wazzup?
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
Spam filter...Since yesterday it got a bit crazy...
In second thought - and in your case - it come to its senses... 
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
You are clearly a spammer, so they went to the spam moderation queue.
Matthew is working on it...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Nagy Vilmos wrote: Wazzup?
The new "FigLeaf" filter from iShaltKnowShame.va considers Hungarians inherently naked and has done the necessary ?
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
If this gets through while all of Baba's posts are fed to the Hamsters, then the filter's fine.
I think that while having a rum-baba, or several, while playing the original Desi Arnaz' rendition of "Babalou" in duet with his young son, Ricky: [^].
I will contemplate the current fearful ascendancy of the evil star Ketu's influence on CodeProject's web-site, hoping that the even more dreadful Rahu is not nearing its antipodal proximity to Earth, signifying an even more sinister misfortune.
cheers, Bill
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Or worse: if Bel-Shamharoth rises, we'll all have to use Octal for the rest of our miserable lives...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
