Click here to Skip to main content
15,887,415 members
Articles / Programming Languages / C#
Tip/Trick

Combining Multiple .NET Assemblies

Rate me:
Please Sign up or sign in to vote.
4.95/5 (125 votes)
20 Mar 2015CPOL2 min read 55.6K   520   145   25
Combining multiple .NET assemblies by customizing MSBuild's project file.

Introduction

Whoever searched for a solution to merge multiple assemblies into a single file probably heard of tools like ILMerge, SmartAssembly, etc.
Another known solution is embedding the DLLs as resources (if anyone's interested, here is a nice article that explains this approach: Load DLL From Embedded Resource[^]).

However on few occasions, I noticed an unnecessary use of these approaches.
If we have these assemblies source codes, then we can achieve the combining by importing all the source code files into a single project at compile time.

In this tip, I'll try to explain briefly how to accomplish that.

For demonstration purposes, let's say we have a console application (our main assembly) that references and uses two class libraries (our secondary assemblies) and we want to combine them all into a single file:

When building this solution, we get three assemblies as expected:

Note that MyExecutable's project file (MyExecutable.csproj) is an XML based file and if we inspect its contents, we can find few ItemGroup nodes. These nodes contain child elements that define the build processes inputs. These child elements can refer to application's source files that need to be compiled, or resource files that need to be copied or assemblies that need to be included in the build process (if anyone's interested, you can read more about Visual Studio project files on MSDN MSBuild).

Now let's locate the ItemGroup node that refers to our included assemblies:

XML
<ItemGroup>
  <ProjectReference Include="..\MyLibrary1\MyLibrary1.csproj">
    <Project>{ea53ca82-13d7-4be1-b95a-4d9d7853d46e}</Project>
    <Name>MyLibrary1</Name>
  </ProjectReference>
  <ProjectReference Include="..\MyLibrary2\MyLibrary2.csproj">
    <Project>{c31d21f3-e86a-4581-b4e8-acae6644d19e}</Project>
    <Name>MyLibrary2</Name>
  </ProjectReference>
</ItemGroup>

Here, we will add a condition that will indicate to MSBuild to use these project references when building MyExecutable in Debug mode:

XML
<ItemGroup Condition=" '$(Configuration)' == 'Debug' ">

But for Release mode, we will include all the source code files from both MyLibrary1 and MyLibrary2 to be compiled as well. We will do this by using a wild card ("\**\*.cs") that will include all the CS files in the directory and its subdirectories. The wild card will also include some unwanted source code files (for this case, those are TemporaryGeneratedFile_[guid].cs files in obj folder and AssemblyInfo.cs file in Property folder) so we will have to exclude them:

XML
<ItemGroup Condition=" '$(Configuration)' == 'Release' ">
  <Compile Include="..\MyLibrary1\**\*.cs"
           Exclude="..\MyLibrary1\Properties\AssemblyInfo.cs;
                    ..\MyLibrary1\obj\**;
                    ..\MyLibrary1\bin\**">
    <Link>MyLibrary1\%(RecursiveDir)%(Filename)%(Extension)</Link>
    <Visible>false</Visible>
  </Compile>
  <Compile Include="..\MyLibrary2\**\*.cs"
           Exclude="..\MyLibrary2\Properties\AssemblyInfo.cs;
                    ..\MyLibrary2\obj\**;
                    ..\MyLibrary2\bin\**">
    <Link>MyLibrary2\%(RecursiveDir)%(Filename)%(Extension)</Link>
    <Visible>false</Visible>
  </Compile>
</ItemGroup>

And that is it, let's save these changes in MyExecutable.csproj file and rebuild the solution in Release mode:

Last thing I would like to emphasize as a sort of troubleshooting advice, because we are literally moving the compilation of all assemblies source files into a single project, that project needs to be able to compile those files. So you need to consider the following:

  • The main assembly needs to have all the references, resources, settings, etc. of the secondary assemblies in order to build successfully.
  • All assemblies need to be written in the same .NET language.

License

This article, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)


Written By
Software Developer GemBox Ltd.
Croatia Croatia
I'm a developer at GemBox Software, working on:

  • GemBox.Spreadsheet - Read, write, convert, and print XLSX, XLS, XLSB, CSV, HTML, and ODS spreadsheets from .NET applications.
  • GemBox.Document - Read, write, convert, and print DOCX, DOC, PDF, RTF, HTML, and ODT documents from .NET applications.
  • GemBox.Pdf - Read, write, edit, and print PDF files from .NET applications.
  • GemBox.Presentation - Read, write, convert, and print PPTX, PPT, and PPSX presentations from .NET applications.
  • GemBox.Email - Read, write, and convert MSG, EML, and MHTML email files, or send and receive email messages using POP, IMAP, SMTP, and EWS from .NET applications.
  • GemBox.Imaging - Read, convert, and transform PNG, JPEG, and GIF images from .NET applications.

Comments and Discussions

 
QuestionAbout file types in library Pin
leiyangge9-Dec-15 14:26
leiyangge9-Dec-15 14:26 
AnswerRe: About file types in library Pin
Mario Z9-Dec-15 21:14
professionalMario Z9-Dec-15 21:14 
GeneralRe: About file types in library Pin
leiyangge9-Dec-15 21:48
leiyangge9-Dec-15 21:48 
GeneralRe: About file types in library Pin
Mario Z9-Dec-15 22:03
professionalMario Z9-Dec-15 22:03 
QuestionWhat's the use? Pin
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov25-Mar-15 4:26
mvaSergey Alexandrovich Kryukov25-Mar-15 4:26 
AnswerRe: What's the use? Pin
Mario Z25-Mar-15 7:27
professionalMario Z25-Mar-15 7:27 
GeneralRe: What's the use? Pin
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov25-Mar-15 7:53
mvaSergey Alexandrovich Kryukov25-Mar-15 7:53 
GeneralRe: What's the use? Pin
Mario Z25-Mar-15 11:45
professionalMario Z25-Mar-15 11:45 
GeneralRe: What's the use? Pin
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov25-Mar-15 12:26
mvaSergey Alexandrovich Kryukov25-Mar-15 12:26 
All right, I really try to understand who is right here and what is your contribution. But first, we need to agree on one thing: you should not try to press on anyone discussing the votes on any posts. Formally, you cannot even know who is voted, you only have the general statistics. And I don't want to discuss it, to avoid creation of the precedent. This is a free community where we freely express our opinions and people are not used to arguments over votes. We all, including myself, receive our share of bad voted, and some can be unfair. You need to earn votes by our posts, quality of content. You should not blame anyone for being rude just for posting. Who told you anything rude? If you continue such arguments, I'll have to stop the communications.

I already give you my arguments on your article value, so, if you want, we can discuss it. I can vote any time the way I find appropriate, but of course, we can argue over my opinions.

So, here is another thing: look at the article you quoted first. It comes with source code. Anyone can download it and try out. What can you present to anyone so this person could quickly perform the build and then look at the results, do some tests, anything. It needs comprehensive solution with one-click build. Without it, the article on this topic could not be considered good enough. You really need to provide such a way for the reader.

Now, after some more reading, I can say that I really don't quite understand your approach. But it means that I need some more detailed information. It's quite possible that I misunderstood you. I still think that not seeing the usage would be not only my fault; if you claim something, you have to explain the value.

You are quite right that I "never encountered a situation in which you had to merge multiple assemblies". So what? Do you have any rational arguments. Your arguments on my consideration on overhead miss the logic. The saving overhead is pointless, is that what you say? All right, I would not disagree, I only say that usual merge save on them. I never advocated importance of it. I just thought that this is at least some benefit and speculated that your approach does not offer it. But now I probably can see that your solutions removes the overhead as well. All right, if this is not a point, there is no a point to argue.

Now, let me understand if there is another thing: maintenance overhead. How would you support modified solution for "Release"? Are you still able to add new projects to the solution, move parts of code from one project to another one, in few words, do all multi-project engineering freely? I see the problem here. If this is all possible and well maintained, please explain. Again, without a comprehensive code sample, it's hard to do.

Your arguments based solely on the assumption that the merge is useful itself, the value is having one file instead of few, and your only argument is "that every developer (or at least a large number of them) that is working in component vendor company will strongly disagree with you". How, how can you know what "every developer" thinks about it? Please, let's discuss only rational arguments: why you think that having just one file worth the effort.

Thank you for understanding. I really hope you update the article, provide a comprehensive sample and rational arguments.

—SA
Sergey A Kryukov

GeneralRe: What's the use? Pin
Mario Z25-Mar-15 15:30
professionalMario Z25-Mar-15 15:30 
GeneralRe: What's the use? Pin
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov25-Mar-15 16:40
mvaSergey Alexandrovich Kryukov25-Mar-15 16:40 
GeneralRe: What's the use? Pin
Mario Z26-Mar-15 7:24
professionalMario Z26-Mar-15 7:24 
GeneralRe: What's the use? Pin
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov26-Mar-15 9:05
mvaSergey Alexandrovich Kryukov26-Mar-15 9:05 
GeneralRe: What's the use? Pin
Mario Z27-Mar-15 5:05
professionalMario Z27-Mar-15 5:05 
GeneralNow it's clear, but... Pin
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov27-Mar-15 12:28
mvaSergey Alexandrovich Kryukov27-Mar-15 12:28 
GeneralRe: Now it's clear, but... Pin
Mario Z27-Mar-15 23:42
professionalMario Z27-Mar-15 23:42 
GeneralAgain: it won't build Pin
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov28-Mar-15 0:07
mvaSergey Alexandrovich Kryukov28-Mar-15 0:07 
GeneralRe: Again: it won't build Pin
Mario Z28-Mar-15 0:17
professionalMario Z28-Mar-15 0:17 
GeneralRe: Again: it won't build Pin
Mario Z31-Mar-15 3:08
professionalMario Z31-Mar-15 3:08 
GeneralRe: Again: it won't build Pin
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov31-Mar-15 3:44
mvaSergey Alexandrovich Kryukov31-Mar-15 3:44 
GeneralRe: Again: it won't build PinPopular
Mario Z31-Mar-15 3:55
professionalMario Z31-Mar-15 3:55 
GeneralRe: Again: it won't build Pin
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov31-Mar-15 3:59
mvaSergey Alexandrovich Kryukov31-Mar-15 3:59 
GeneralIt works, failed to reproduce the problem Pin
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov31-Mar-15 4:20
mvaSergey Alexandrovich Kryukov31-Mar-15 4:20 
GeneralRe: What's the use? Pin
stixoffire7-Jul-15 5:54
stixoffire7-Jul-15 5:54 
GeneralRe: What's the use? Pin
Mario Z7-Jul-15 21:54
professionalMario Z7-Jul-15 21:54 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Praise Praise    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.