|
I can see it atm.
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
I can see it now. 
Thanks
Do not forget to comment and rate the article if it helped you by any means.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm receiving the same comment more than once. Seems that there is bug for email messaging.
Wonde Tadesse
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please forward all notifications to me at chris at codeproject.com?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please forward all notifications to me at chris at codeproject.com?
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
-- modified 19-May-15 11:01am.
|
|
|
|
|
I just observed for the second time that a message that I modified much later didn't get marked with "[modified]" in the subject line and the message also doesn't show the "modified ... hr ago." remark. But it seems to happen just randomly.
If it helps, it was this message this time (I added the "[modified]" manually in a third edit):
http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/5059886/Re-Help-with-a-static-class-modified.aspx[^]
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Was it within 5 minutes? That time frame won't show [Modified].
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
No, it was over an hour later in this case and a day or so in the previous case.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps because it already has the word modified in the title? What happens if you modify this thread?
|
|
|
|
|
P0mpey3 wrote: Perhaps because it already has the word modified in the title?
Not sure who's the one who's misunderstanding what here  However, the other time I observed it there was no "modified" anywhere, so it doesn't seem to be related to that.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, this was a great bug.
Note to self (and everyone):
timeSincePosted.Minutes != timeSincePosted.TotalMinutes
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Been there, done that. Fun one, isn't it?
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
I just had that one two days ago or so. Maybe my code is your oracle? Should I mail you all the bugs I find in my code? 
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
We could do a bug swap
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
As you are the one who suggested this I'm not sure any more who would profit
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
I am using the discussion method because I could not find a link to the Code Project Administrator.
I have chosen, review and save the settings in my user profile for the following:
SEND ME AN EMAIL IF SOMEONE REPLIES TO MY MESSAGE.
I have receiving responses, but no email to alert me of the response. Can I please get some guidance into this matter?
|
|
|
|
|
Have you checked your spam filter?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 19-May-15 9:47am.
|
|
|
|
|
I am about to write an article and I spent much more time formatting the text than I did for the same text on the GitHub using markdown. I suggest to add markdown support for writing articles here.
|
|
|
|
|
It will definitely be added.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please, add MPL 2.0 to the license list for articles and code. Currently there is MPL 1.1.
|
|
|
|
|
When a blog post is pulled it is sent for moderation to moderation queue. Most of them (my guess is 90%, because 90% of my last week's statistics about these posts say that they) have a problem of format. Most of the blogs have good content, good topic discussed and other similar good things. But the format such as syntax highlighting, other targeting scripts and web analytics JavaScript script files inside the HTML make them not comply to the CodeProject standards.
Some of these bloggers are good members of CodeProject so they also know good about CodeProject standards and theme. They can edit their posts in a way that it suits CodeProject theme and standards.
Wouldn't it be easy, along with the notification of "Your blog {blog} has been consumed and {number of articles} have been pulled". You also show them a link to where they can check their posts and then submit publish. On the page you can ask them to check if the post complies with standards including quality and quantity of post, syntax highlighting (if used) and other stuff such as removing the scripts and other HTML raw data.
This would save one cycle of moderators and would ask the user to manually publish the post after reviewing the stuff.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
