|
Knowing some of Dave's traits 'Gin and Twitter' don't mix?
|
|
|
|
|
"Bugger, I shouldn't have done that - who can I blame?" Then?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Did he ever state he didn't say what was said in the tweet?
|
|
|
|
|
It was a Facebook post. In the Newspaper article he says it was an 'administrator' that posted it.
In the CP reply I linked to he says "And it wasn't me who posted it."
|
|
|
|
|
P0mpey3 wrote: It was a Facebook post.
So it was.
His responses read very like this, if you assume he said it:"
“written in haste by a fellow administrator”. Someone else posted what I said in private
“(It was) pulled by me at the first opportunity, it would have been pulled quicker had I been at home." I first saw the post down the pub and quickly realised the damage it would cause
“It should never have gone out in that format." The way I would have liked it to go out would have been "Oh look some nice travelling folk. The weather doesn't look too clever does it"
“It has been the subject of intense discussion between us." The c**k-up caused an enormous row
“He has apologised to me, and I offer my apologies to those who have been offended by it.” He has apologised for putting my comments on Facebook - I need to do some damage limitation
|
|
|
|
|
It should never have gone out in that format - Is obviously a reference to the fact he missed the word "Into" from the sentence "The Pikies have moved the car park next to the shops"
|
|
|
|
|
|
I started a band called 999 Megabytes, but we haven’t gotten a gig yet.
(Sorry it's early, but I'm having a busy day and don't have a lot of free time... )
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Well then it's a long way to Tera
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
OK, I'll byte. Why?
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
You need another 25
=========================================================
I'm an optoholic - my glass is always half full of vodka.
=========================================================
|
|
|
|
|
As much as I would like to agree with you (along with many others in here, I'm sure), the current IEC standard disagrees.
1000 Megabytes = 1 Gigabyte.
The United States invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted every other alternative. -Winston Churchill
America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. -Oscar Wilde
Wow, even the French showed a little more spine than that before they got their sh*t pushed in.[^] -Colin Mullikin
|
|
|
|
|
Colin Mullikin wrote: 1000 Megabytes = 1 Gigabyte. The only problem with that is that Gibibyte just sounds funky. It's not natural I tell you. Not natural at all.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Blame the Swiss.
The United States invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted every other alternative. -Winston Churchill
America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. -Oscar Wilde
Wow, even the French showed a little more spine than that before they got their sh*t pushed in.[^] -Colin Mullikin
|
|
|
|
|
Just be grateful they haven't decimalised time and date (yet)!
|
|
|
|
|
Too late![^]
The United States invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted every other alternative. -Winston Churchill
America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. -Oscar Wilde
Wow, even the French showed a little more spine than that before they got their sh*t pushed in.[^] -Colin Mullikin
|
|
|
|
|
BRING IT ON! Can't wait.
Sidenote: When friends or new programmers complain that they just can't get their heads around octal or hex, I remind them that they're fluent in base-12 (inches, hours), base-24 (hours), base-60 (minutes, seconds), etc.
Thank goodness for SI!
|
|
|
|
|
So, today the product owner for my team was a minute and a half late to our daily scrum meeting. We were already done...
The United States invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted every other alternative. -Winston Churchill
America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. -Oscar Wilde
Wow, even the French showed a little more spine than that before they got their sh*t pushed in.[^] -Colin Mullikin
|
|
|
|
|
"
The Daily Scrum is not meant to be attended by anyone other than the members of the Development Team. This includes the Product Owner. In fact, the Scrum Master is not even required to attend.
" -- Professional Scrum Development with Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2012, Richard Hundhausen
"
The Scrum Master enforces the rule that only Development Team members participate in the Daily Scrum.
" -- scrumguides.org
modified 22-Jun-15 11:47am.
|
|
|
|
|
That's true but I still approve of rapid stand-ups in the Daily Scrum.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, brevity is the soul of many things.
|
|
|
|
|
As a Delphi shop, we eschew all things Microsoft**, and as such, we follow the guide from Scrum.org rather than anything Microsoft has published.
Also, he (product owner) doesn't fully participate in the meeting. He observes, then clarifies any issues or questions that arise.
** This isn't entirely true, but for purposes of this post, it holds true.
The United States invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted every other alternative. -Winston Churchill
America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. -Oscar Wilde
Wow, even the French showed a little more spine than that before they got their sh*t pushed in.[^] -Colin Mullikin
|
|
|
|
|
Only the team participate, but
1) it is an open meeting that anyone may observe.
2) there is a fair chunk of discussion as to whether PO is part of the team there are valid arguments in both directions so it makes sense for the team to manage in whichever fashion they see fit (they won their process)
3) Would we ban someone talking at stand up (such as SME the team have asked for help) just to comply with an MS or Scrumguide view? that would be a bit daft....
|
|
|
|
|
1) OK
2) The Product Owner is a member of the Scrum Team, but is not a member of the Development Team.
3) "The Development Team or team members often meet immediately after the Daily Scrum for detailed discussions, or to adapt, or replan, the rest of the Sprint’s work."
If you're not following the Scrum Guide, you're not doing Scrum. And that's OK; no one says you have to. I'm not, but at least I know I'm not.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: If you're not following the Scrum Guide, you're not doing Scrum. And that's OK; no one says you have to. I'm not, but at least I know I'm not.
But that's not true, pretty much every scrum guide and or book (whether it's The Scrum Guide or other) clearly say that scrum is empirically adaptive, the teams should tweak the framework to what suits them best. Obviously diverge too far and you are no longer doing scrum, but I really don't think whether a PO is active in the daily is pushing the limit to say what is being done is no longer scrum. If the discussions change the daily from a quick sync to something else then I would coach the team away from it, but if it still a daily sync that is useful to the team, then run with it and accept that is how your team want to use scrum at that moment in time.
|
|
|
|