|
Top list for month is also missing. 
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Either a question is spam or not completely, then there is the option to report the issue.
But should a user be afraid to ask a question, because it is perhaps too easy ... for all these omniscient here?
I suggest questions can be voted from 3....6.
modified 26-Jun-15 19:46pm.
|
|
|
|
|
You're saying "upvote or nothing".
I disagree. There are cases where a question is just a poor question. Possibly worded well, not spam, not abusive. Just a poor question.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
itislikethis wrote: What is a "poor" question? From the view of the questioner I think there can not be a poor question, if she/he needs an answer for a specific problem. Even this problem for others is maybe a trivial thing.
I want log for user in my web.
Plz... gimme codezzzzz, it is urgentzzz
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes this is a poor question and it is ok to downvote that. But have look how many well phrased questions will be downvoted only the question seems to be too easy for experts.
|
|
|
|
|
I would argue that Nelek's example deserves not only a down-vote, but a flag of "Unclear" or "Not a question".
No matter how well-phrased the question is, if copying the text of the question, pasting it into Google, and clicking on the first result (or anything on the first page) gives you the answer, then it deserves a down-vote. Not because it's too easy, but because the OP clearly made no effort to find the answer, and decided to use QA as a "mechanical Turk" search engine instead.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Look at Quick Answers Convert seconds to minute and hour[^]
What do you think of it ?
2 pieces of code, not a single sentence to explain the problem, and the tittle is about primary school knowledge.
Down vote ?
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
Obligatory XKCD[^]
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
The Visual Studio 2015 forum shows only the title of the forum and nothing else. No stickies, no posts, nuthin'.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
As is the Ruby on Rails forum.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Both seem fine to me
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Both of them are empty for me, either.
I can understand there is no content; that may simply mean that noone ever posted anything in them.
But the main problem is, there is no button, at all, to start a new subject.
while (true) {
continue;
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same problem here - no messages, and no button to post a new message. It's the same in Firefox, IE11 and Chrome.
Web04 | 2.8.150624.2 | Last Updated 31 Dec 2014
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
My usual setting is Normal layout.
After article for a keyword, and go to an article, the layout change for that article discussion.
Is it normal behaviour ?
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
If you go to an article as the result of a search then we open up the forum discussions. This is in case you came via Google, and they indexed that page by some words in the discussions instead of the article content.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
Would it be possible to change behaviour ?
when the search is done a logged member, use the member settings.
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
Possible, yes, but I'd prefer to make it easier for people searching - logged in or not - to find stuff from a search.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Recently, I got an email that I had a reply to a forum message and followed the link to post my own reply (or at least see the context) - but it wasn't there, it had gone to moderation (from which I released it).
But if a message (or a QA solution) goes to moderation shouldn't the system send the notification when it is released, or never if it is crushed and used as fertilizer?
Just seems odd to email spam out which never appears on the site!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: But if a message (or a QA solution) goes to moderation shouldn't the system send the notification when it is released
The message you get will only be sent to hi-rep members. It's a courtesy to let you know "don't panic - we got your message".
New members don't see this.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
