|
That is not a general Linux forum but one about LAMP[^].
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, then maybe a typo I guess. 
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Reference Articles aren't shown in the table on your profile page. It might be useful to have them there.
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure if you have noticed this by now, but there is a reference articles tab at the top.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I've seen that one, but I actually meant on your profile page, in the table of "Articles", "Tech Blogs", "Messages" etc.
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah. OK.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
It'll be there next deploy
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I was just surfing around, when I noticed that after long time we are still members of that group. So, I wanted to discuss here "Whether that group is still required?".
Or whether there is something new coming out, as there are some great discussions on going, for example that message from BillWoodruff.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Short answer: no we don't.
Longer: yes we do.
(I'll let you guys have a field day with that)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: (I'll let you guys have a field day with that)
Shall I begin?
But the "longer" answer is two characters shorter than the "short" answer! 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I have a similar question I have posted in the forum yesterday. Today I have posted the final revision of my article. why it was not yet approved?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
The most recent version of your article in the queue was published 3 hours ago. It can take some hours for an article to be approved.
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
How many times do you have to be told this before you learn some patience? At your reputation level, changes aren't posted immediately and you have to wait for the volunteers who review the articles to actually have a chance to review and vote. Seriously, you're just going to end up annoying people if you keep popping up demanding to know why the volunteers haven't dropped everything to review your article (and remember that yours isn't the only article that people review).
|
|
|
|
|
I'm really sorry for my impatience. Now, I'm understanding. I will no longer raise the questions like that. Thanks a lot. Sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excuse me. I'mean very sorry for my impatience. I will never spam the forum with that question. I've already promised that to Peter O'Hanlon.
Sorry. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
It seems to me that a lot of automatization took place when choosing and categorizing the articles for monthly contest - too lot maybe...
1. The category...For instance my article wen to the C# category (I believe because it has a C# tag as the code sample in C#), but it is definitely NOT a C# article but something about design so it may go to the 'else' category...
2. Articles of poor quality (or uncomplete) are on the list, sometimes the article has a lot of votes from people that clearly do not understand the problems with those articles.
To keep CP quality not only you should hand out prizes to quality articles, but let into the final such ones...I think a bit more human intervention will do good...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
I know that I can edit it on a post-by-post basis. But where is the link to edit the "permanent" signature? I've searched all through my profile and cannot find it.  
#SupportHeForShe If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
Only 2 things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
You can change it at "My Settings" -> "Forums" -> "Message Signature".
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 13-Jul-15 10:18am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some interesting mathematics in there.
|
|
|
|
|
More than mathematics , there may be some more interesting Logic in some Article related to Hacking or something (I don't have one as an example,but have reported too many in past). If we allow this, i would say we should surely allow that ones also as its more related to programming than this one.
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
I don't see what you are objecting to; the program is about calculating the odds on a bet. Whether you agree with gambling or not it is quite reasonable for a blog. And since it has nothing to do with hacking I don't see the connection with your last statement.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
