|
"Recent reputation points" table shows three up votes in the last 24 hours. However the number of votes remains unchanged. Any explanation?
|
|
|
|
|
The number of votes on what remains unchanged?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Under the title of any article you have how many people voted for the article. In my case 3 days ago the number was 345. If you look at recent reputation points of the same article, 4 people upvoted between Sept 1 and 2. Now the total is 346. It should be 349.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah.
Two possible explanations:
- You hit the daily limit[^] on the number of points per day you can earn on article upvotes
- We had a database issue yesterday morning for 2 hrs. This meant a few actions may not have been correctly registered against reputation. We're still investigating this one.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
The first one is obviously not the case because I had 4 in two days. It is probably the second one.
|
|
|
|
|
I think you got it the wrong way around. From what I understood its about the number of votes on the article that only got incremented by 1, but he could see (from the reputation history) that actually 4 people voted on that article.
|
|
|
|
|
I did something simple somewhere on the site (I forgot what) and a popup says that I need to verify my email address. I see that there is a notification message for it. Going there (ie. read the notification message) says that a confirmation request was sent to my email. I don't see anything relevant. I searched for "confirmation" and nothing useful shows up. I don't see how to request a confirmation email anywhere on the CP website. I don't see any documentation on what to do.
==> What do I do?
I'm retired. There's a nap for that...
- Harvey
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, I figured it out. Just going to the web page sends an email message. I was looking for a "send email" button that didn't exist. Since I had my email open when I visited the page, I couldn't find the message that hadn't delivered yet. POP3 download request found it.
Ya ya ya I still use POP3/SMTP. Same to you. 
I'm retired. There's a nap for that...
- Harvey
|
|
|
|
|
H.Brydon wrote: Ya ya ya I still use POP3/SMTP
We won't judge you. 
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Whilst I understand the scope of users for this language to be somewhat limited and more specifically its focused on game development. I have started learning this language and write an article on it specifically for the Corona SDk however its not listed in tha languages in the article writer.
I kindly request it to be added for ease of tagging articles. I understand for formatting purposes, there are some keywords that might need addition, I can volunteer to do that too.
Kind Regards with many thanks. 
You can do anything you set your mind to! Believe in yourself!
|
|
|
|
|
Lua is also used in platforms such as Redis.
Anyone can write an article on Lua and add the Lua tag themselves.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Good idea, to support Lua. I though it was about syntax highlighting and support of the lang attribute, as in <pre lang="Lua">...</pre> This is the only aspect which would require the suggestion…
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
World of Warcraft by Blizzard Entertainment, uses Lua.
Just chiming in.
|
|
|
|
|
Neverwinter Nights uses Lua for its mods, and as far as I know the base language for mods of The elder Scrolls and Fallout series is Lua as well.
Geek code v 3.12 {
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
}
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
|
|
|
|
|
Lua uses Lua
... just saying ...
Decrease the belief in God, and you increase the numbers of those who wish to play at being God by being “society’s supervisors,” who deny the existence of divine standards, but are very serious about imposing their own standards on society.-Neal A. Maxwell
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
I have edited this question[^]
The question has been updated but it shows as "no name" for the person who updated the question. Is this a bug or something
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
Will be displayed after sometime. Caching.
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did I fix it?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
looks like it.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Cool. Thank you kindly for the report.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
We don't automatically remove anything from accounts removed by reports. Doing so would lead to situations where legitimate content was nuked just because certain members were trigger happy. Unfortunately we do have high ranking members who report other members for no apparent reason at all.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Sure, this is clear, but what to do in this case? It's a big contamination to the site. The span messages are still there. Removing spammers' accounts is just one part, but keeping spam messages showing defeats the purpose of anti-spam measures.
The sample of this particular spam comment can be found here: For a program to be run on Windows and OS X, what programming language(s) is best to use?[^].
I hope you will understand my concern if you take a look at it. There was 40 if them when I looked at them for the last time.
Thank you.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Sign out and you'll notice you can no longer see the message. Search engines won't see it, nor will casual users. Signed-in members will still be able to see the evidence swaying in the breeze.
Doing so allows members to not only close questions, but also re-open questions that shouldn't have been closed.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
