|
Should you crepe up behind people who eat pancakes?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
What? And pour syrup on them? (Yes I see what you did)
Mongo: Mongo only pawn... in game of life.
|
|
|
|
|
Corporal Agarn wrote: I see what you did
Well don't tell anyone.
Did you know that it takes 462 different muscles to dig a hole deep enough that the police will never find out what you did? I have a spade... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
But not nearly that many muscles to throw someone in the hole. I have a list!
New version: WinHeist Version Everyone you will ever meet knows something you don't. -Bill Nye-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nice find! It wouldn't be so much a mass grave more of a side by side. 
Exes can't live with em can't bury em.
New version: WinHeist Version Everyone you will ever meet knows something you don't. -Bill Nye-
|
|
|
|
|
Only if you all-purpose flour 'em to:
- butter 'em up
- get all saucy with 'em
- milk the joke for a while
- whip 'em into shape
- beat 'em egg-ageratingly
and, lastly:
- scare the crêpes out of 'em, of which, likely, they'll flip you
|
|
|
|
|
As long as you're not in a flap jack.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
No, you may be charged with batter-y.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
And you know how that always pans out.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed, people should know butter.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
Or at least know how to grease palms.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
It's easy to find those less savory characters.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, they're the salt of the earth.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your brain: it fascinates and scares me.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like a line from Zachary Quinto's character 'Sylar'[^] on Heroes.
Hmm.
Hamster-wrangling could be a superpower in certain contexts...
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
That's possibly the nicest thing anyone has said to me all day!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Nice try there, Bridge. Unfortunately, math is broken. This is common for all those converters to JavaScript (except Emscripten of course, which actually works). Could we all stop doing this, please? It's not that hard to get it right.
Bridge.NET right now:
int a = int.MaxValue;
int b = a + a;
Global.Alert(b);
var a = 2147483647;
var b = a + a;
Bridge.global.alert(b);
http://live.bridge.net/#4c6aca236466b524c45e[^]
No Bridge, an int cannot be 4294967294. The only correct result is -2, because the only correct result is "whatever C# does".
Suggested code: come on guys, this is trivial to generate.
var a = 2147483647;
var b = a + a | 0;
Bridge.global.alert(b);
long doesn't even begin to work. I admit that would be a bit trickier, but tough sh*t, the job of a compiler is to get the semantics right, even if it isn't trivial. I'm disappointed, and frankly, annoyed. "But GWT does it too!" - yes and they were wrong to do it. Bridge seems to be yet an other syntax converter that doesn't actually care about semantics. And what's the point of that? If I have to write "JavaScript, but in C#" then why would I even do it? I don't get to use existing C# code because it wouldn't bloody work, the only thing I get is slightly different syntax. It doesn't even do type checking.
modified 20-Oct-15 10:08am.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Harold, good catch: did you notify Bridge about this ?
«I want to stay as close to the edge as I can without going over. Out on the edge you see all kinds of things you can't see from the center» Kurt Vonnegut.
|
|
|
|
|
Not yet. Do you think it would help? I can't imagine they don't know about this already.
|
|
|
|
|
I can. It's an edge case - okay, it's one that's pretty easy to check, but I doubt they've been so rigorous with cases like this.
|
|
|
|
|
Alright then. I've tweeted them, might also post in their forum
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe they'll give you a pressie for finding something they missed
|
|
|
|
|
harold aptroot wrote: Bridge seems to be yet an other syntax converter that doesn't actually care about semantics.
Javascript has semantics??? 
Marc
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
