|
|
I notice that up voted posts no longer have the caption that tells what the vote tally is, in the lower right.
Is this by design?
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
The vote tallies had the morning off for personal reasons.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there! I'm trying to change my avatar, but still there's a problem. After I upload new avatar and click save - I get 404 http://screencast.com/t/J1OfldxA
Nice but I want a new avatar)
|
|
|
|
|
Try unchecking your Gravatar box. Hit save my settings. Then upload your picture and hit save my settings again.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have been continuously logged in for months, if not years, and recently started being blocked from upvoting with the complaint 'You need a verified email address'. What is going on?
My long term goal is to live forever. So far, so good...
|
|
|
|
|
We only allow voting from confirmed email addresses (helps limit abuse). I've had a "confirm your email" email sent to your address. Just click the link and you'll be good to go.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks - the universe is back to being a nice place 
My long term goal is to live forever. So far, so good...
|
|
|
|
|
Not quite a bug, unless it is.
I found this under my own post[^] in QA
Posted 4.44057523361111hrs 10 mins ago
Edited 3.80724190027778hrs 20 mins ago v2
Not sure how to read that, but that's either a very long time ago (in a galaxy far away?) or very accurate (apart from the minutes/seconds/milliseconds...)!
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: Not sure how to read that
Too much precision is a problem for you? 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
In my country we use a comma as decimal separator 
|
|
|
|
|
Also getting that...
Quote: 3.77032624922222hrs 15 mins ago
|
|
|
|
|
The timestamps in QA and also in moderation queue are displayed with wrong hour value e.g. 1.21356196908333hrs 5 mins ago
|
|
|
|
|
Yep - we're in the middle of a badly timed update that couldn't wait. The final bits will fix this.
Gimme a few mins!
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
You'll be fine in 5.4927893483 minutes 
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
"When you have eliminated the JavaScript, whatever remains must be an empty page." -- Mike Hankey
"just eat it, eat it"."They're out to mold, better eat while you can" -- HobbyProggy
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: badly timed
No pun intended, I presume.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Actually I'd been waiting all year to use that pun.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Very Punny.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
This might be off-topic, but I would just like to say how much I appreciate the friendly, helpful attitude I find amongst (almost) all the contributors here on Code Project.
Despite being a professional software developer, I have just been banned from a competing website (whose name is a common runtime error when using recursion). My crime was that the quality of my contributions was too low. I have always tried to solve my problems myself before posting, have always used good English, and am always polite and courteous towards other members. Out of all my posts, only a couple have been voted down. And now I am banned from posting. With no time limit and no idea how to correct my account.
I actually suspect that the real reason I was banned was because I once asked if I was the only member who felt the site was becoming a very unfriendly place.
Anyway, well done Code Project. Please keep up the great work everyone.
Kind wishes ~ Patrick
Thank you to anyone taking the time to read my posts.
|
|
|
|
|
This is the right place. The CP team often doesn't get the praise they deserve, so every little message helps!
And to the CP team, Keep It Up! You guys are AWESOME!
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Oh stop, you're making us blush.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
The bug is back. Now on Web01, Web04.
2015.11.18 10:45am ET - Now on Web03
/ravi
modified 18-Nov-15 10:47am.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 20-Nov-15 6:35am.
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes I like to respond in "outline" format on QA, as in this answer here: [^].
But, as you can see, the CP editor mangles my "outline headers."
Is there a way to either over-ride that behavior, or is there some format which is "safe" to use ... perhaps, like:
A
a1
a2
B
b1
b2
b2a
b2b
...
Yeah, I never recovered from using the More Outliner (and David Dunham's 'Acta for the Mac) from way back when outlining was a BFD.
«I want to stay as close to the edge as I can without going over. Out on the edge you see all kinds of things you can't see from the center» Kurt Vonnegut.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
