|
The queue is actually empty. So it will not be shown on the main page. Wait a while and you might see it again.
But there seem to be some members around at the moment that approve everything as soon as something new pops up.
|
|
|
|
|
Jochen Arndt wrote: The queue is actually empty. So it will not be shown on the main page. Wait a while and you might see it again.
Could be but it's been like that for a few days now.
I'll keep an eye on it for the time being, see if it returns or not.
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
9 items in the queue at the moment...
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, queue is back.
Must have been cause it was empty, hadn't happen that yet so...
Mystery solved 
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
Is there any reason why a message with status "message automatically removed" can't be removed? Not even with the "X" available for protectors?
It is not the first time I ask for help to clean up messages that are already "auto-deleted" but still appearing in the search list with full spam in title or first sentence in overview. When I go to the messages most of them have been successfully reported by the needed members.
I know that if a message contains answers, is more difficult to get ride of it. But when it is the only one... it annoys a bit not being able to delete it.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
We leave messages in place so that deleted messages can be undeleted.
Nelek wrote: still appearing in the search list with full spam in title or first sentence in overview
This I'll get fixed.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: We leave messages in place so that deleted messages can be undeleted.
Fair enough
Chris Maunder wrote: This I'll get fixed.
This is another reason why I like CP... Thanks for feedback
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Chris / Sean / Matthew!
I assume you've already seen one of those very obvious spammer accounts like this one:
(Other members reading this please don't report that account so the admins will be able to see what I mean.)
Mucend - Professional Profile - CodeProject[^]
In the last few days I've reported several of these in the Spam&Abuse forum. First I looked them up by manually scrolling through the MemberIdDesc-Pages, then, three days ago, I wrote a program to do this. It collects new accounts that have an image or a biography or a homepage-link (and lists them for inspection and subsequent reporting). So I was able to gather some statistical data (from 3 days) without going crazy:
Approximately 4% of all new accounts satisfy these criteria (image||bio||homepage) and almost all of those actually are spam accounts. With roughly 2000 new accounts per day that's about 80 new (obvious) spammer accounts per day. That's (IMO) more than what can be handled in the Spam&Abuse forum. Thus I would suggest you set up some own procedure to nuke them.
Sascha
(programmer for hire  )
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
modified 14-Jan-16 21:24pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I second this one! Good shot!
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
"When you have eliminated the JavaScript, whatever remains must be an empty page." -- Mike Hankey
"just eat it, eat it"."They're out to mold, better eat while you can" -- HobbyProggy
|
|
|
|
|
What's the pattern you're using? A bio with a link?
Note that links are inactive for new members so they are essentially useless accounts. Still - I'm happy to put together a page that allows these things to be found easier.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: What's the pattern you're using? A bio with a link?
No, just any bio other than the string "No Biography provided". Or any image other than a gravatar. Or any homepage-link (which is not inactive for new members).
Chris Maunder wrote: I'm happy to put together a page that allows these things to be found easier.
The problem I'm seeing here when handling this through "traditional means" of reporting is the amount of these accounts per day: Approx. 80; that's 1600 clicks required per day to kick them.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
So essentially you're just looking for non-trivial bio's to narrow down the checking. Gotcha
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, turned out almost all new accounts with any bio are such spammer accounts without doubt.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Another observation: A lot of them are re-using the same image over and over. (Most of the images show some silly 3d toon or look like they're shots of inmates or terrible B-movie characters.) So I guess you could nuke a whole lot at once by scanning your DB for identical images and confirming the image-groups as spammer accounts by looking at just one exemplary account per group. Storing the hashes of these images might be useful for taking further steps.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to my (indirect) suggestion to make homepage-links available only with a certain reputation: Allowing a signature also only with a certain reputation to prevent spam-sigs. Refer: Article forum spammer - CodeProject[^]
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Hi everyone,
I have not received the verification email and I not find nowhere assistance information about this.
Could you help me?
Thanks for advance.
|
|
|
|
|
I have sent you an email confirmation request. Please let me know if you receive it OK.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Not yet!
I tried to send email from another account and if it comes, even yesterday I received a verification email from other forums.
Any suggestions?
|
|
|
|
|
Is it in your spam folder or anything?
This is the newsletter FAQ entry, but some may still apply. Are any of these a problem?
CodeProject Member FAQ[^]
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Message Closed
modified 14-Jan-16 17:26pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Closed
modified 14-Jan-16 17:26pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Closed
modified 14-Jan-16 17:27pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Closed
modified 14-Jan-16 17:27pm.
|
|
|
|
|
You're Right, But I have a persist notification that says me:
Your email address needs to be confirmed.
I shouldn't worry about it? How or when disappear that?
|
|
|
|
|
Dude, he's emailing you directly, so his responses are not actually posted here. So an arbitrary observer would see you repeatedly replying to yourself crossly, and you couldn't blame them for thinking that perhaps you opened a bottle on Thursday afternoon.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
