|
the new program will be the first original series developed specifically for U.S. audiences
You've got buckleys, semi religious, uptight, smarmy bullshit --- AGAIN!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Special effects: awesome.
Storylines: weak.
Political correctness: will make you want to kick the screen in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's a chicken in a windstorm!!??!! And those dark splotches are chicken droppings, donchyakno?!!?
R. Giskard Reventlov wrote: Who cares:
Forsooth!
R. Giskard Reventlov wrote: stunning image. 
Decrease the belief in God, and you increase the numbers of those who wish to play at being God by being “society’s supervisors,” who deny the existence of divine standards, but are very serious about imposing their own standards on society.-Neal A. Maxwell
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed and a welcome to the new CodeProject poster.  
Just because the code works, it doesn't mean that it is good code.
|
|
|
|
|
APOD appears to be too zoomed in.
Where exactly is the Running Chicken?[^]
The color balance is different enough to make orienting the two pictures difficult, but the APOD is showing the area about 1/3rd of the way up from the bottom and in from the left. The Bok globules in the photographers zoomed image[^] are the same; but because the nebulosity is more intense outside that area it's colors are much less saturated than in the APOD.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Does Wally* wear stripes because he doesn't want to be spotted?
* Waldo for our colonial friends
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
You are rock solid on that colorful quip.
Mongo: Mongo only pawn... in game of life.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd check that before I spoke. Otherwise, well plaid, lad, well plaid.
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pedantic peeve of the day: they're hoops, not stripes! Don't care how many 'official' sources say otherwise!
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
So, I took this test as part of an application process. This is what it came up with:
I am "unlikely to set challenging work goals, and may exert a low level of effort toward achievement of goals"
I "may not persist when faced with difficulties or obstacles, or when success seems unlikely"
I "have little interest in volunteering for or taking on new work responsibilities or challenges"
I "Appear to have little or no interest in taking charge, or directing and leading others; may be hesitant to offer opinions"
I "May not be consistently pleasant, good-natured, or cooperative"
The one thing it failed to mention:
"I will be contacting a lawyer to sue Pearson, the creator of this test." I kid you not. These personality tests are utter bullshit.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Good god man, how do you even function in society! 
If a company made me take this test as part of the application/interview process, I would not.
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: If a company made me take this test as part of the application/interview process, I would not.
I think mainly because I was curious, the company contacted me, and I really don't need any more work anyways, I figured, what the hell, let's dance.
It was very educational, and now I know what not to do in the future.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Looks familiar. Did the test involve answering the same questions several times only phrased slightly differently. I took a test like that a few years ago and got the impression I scored zero but my manager wouldn't discuss it with me.
Your analysis seems to match mine.
I may not last forever but the mess I leave behind certainly will.
|
|
|
|
|
Herbie Mountjoy wrote: I may not last forever but the mess I leave behind certainly will.
Absolutely perfect sig....
Ken
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: I "May not be consistently pleasant, good-natured, or cooperative"
Marc Clifton wrote: bullsh*t
I don't know...seems quite accurate.
|
|
|
|
|
PompeyThree wrote: seems quite accurate.
Yeah, there's certain people they should not talk to. 
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Oo! Oo! Let's give one to MM on a Saturday night!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
After watching 2 hours of the shreiker playing tennis
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Go easy on the poor boy, he is a software developer.
I'm retired. There's a nap for that...
- Harvey
|
|
|
|
|
was it online? I now am curious... 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: was it online? I now am curious...
Yeah, google Pearson "Workplace Personality Inventory" test. You have to pay $29 if you want to take it yourself.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
