|
Store it in user cookies and retrieve it. Simple.
tf
|
|
|
|
|
Try the ASP.NET forum. Are you really talking about a link that launches a popup?
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 8-Mar-16 4:20am.
|
|
|
|
|
We have an enterprise application written in .NET WinForms with a SQL Server 2008 R2 database that exists on a classified, closed network. Users have Exchange email accounts on this network, but the mail service has turned from bad to awful. Our application has been using Database Mail to send automated messages, but due to "information assurance" reasons, this has been shut down on us. So since our overall mail experience is so crappy, our functional manager wants to create a "messaging" function within the application.
I would like to emulate the basics of Outlook (write message, reply, forward, Inbox, Sent Messages, Deleted items, etc) as much as possible, while storing the messages in our SQL Server database. I have tried searching for existing solutions that I could either use out-of-the box or use as a starting point that I could modify. So far I've had zero luck.
Does anyone know of anything remotely close to what I'm after. I'd rather not write this from scratch, but I guess if I do it might turn into a decent CP article, huh? 
|
|
|
|
|
So you are looking for an alternate UI for your exchange server's mail functionality? If yes, there is this little old article[^] you might start with (I just found it through search). Another one[^].
"You'd have to be a floating database guru clad in a white toga and ghandi level of sereneness to fix this goddamn clusterfuck.", BruceN[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
No, I need to take Exchange out of the picture. That's one of the two major problems we have. Our Exchange server was regionalized and its reliability is horrible.
I need a UI that is similar to Outlook (at least provides basic mail functionality) but the backend message store needs to be a table structure in SQL Server, not an Exchange server.
|
|
|
|
|
You trying to put a band-aid over a shotgun wound.
The correct course here is to fix the Exchange infrastructure. Without it, your entire business suffers, not just your website.
So, without the SMTP or IMAP server in Exchange, how are you even going to send the emails? The only way for someone to check for any messages would be to login to the website. You really expect customers to do that?
Or perhaps you haven't completely described who is using the email portions of your site and from where.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah... that would be ideal but it's not going to happen. This is a classified government network. They've centralized our Exchange servers and they are totally unreliable. There's absolutely nothing I, or anyone in my organization, can do about it. We basically live with what we've been given.
So our solution is to create a messaging capability within our .NET WinForms/SQL Server application. For our ~400 users, this would just be another module amongst the other functionality they currently have in the application. I'm trying to call this "messaging" because this won't be "email" - no Exchange, no SMTP, no POP, no IMAP.
Messages would be stored in a SQL Server table structure. The UI would resemble Outlook and would let users create messages, reply, forward, manage folders where messages are stored, etc. But the driver behind this would be the message data store in SQL Server.
|
|
|
|
|
Yikes. I'f familiar with the government crap. I did a 4 year stint at DHS/CBP and it wasn't taken kindly that I called people out for not doing their jobs when their customers (us) were down because of misconfigured servers and routers.
I don't know of any library that offers the functionality you're talking about. If you can't find one, this is going to be using existing control libraries and building it from scratch.
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like generic forum-software?
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I thought about that but this is a WinForms environment and I don't know of any forum software with a WinForms UI.
I expect I'll need to roll my own solution...
|
|
|
|
|
PSU Steve wrote: I expect I'll need to roll my own solution
Yes, since you already have some wishes. Any PC will have a modern browser, any forum-software would be easily installed and simple to access. If you do roll your own, I'd recommend taking some open source .NET forum software, to create a new fork and to write only the UI-part.
Having read the entire thread, I'd recommend an Outlook-addin that simply saves the message and the recipient in a database, and write some webpage to list all the messages where the current user is the recipient; would mean that one "adds" an alternative (and redunant) way of sending a message, without replacing the original setup. Additionally, people could still be using a single application with a familiar UI.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
this is a good one. thanks for sharing your answer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I'm facing problem when creating a customer paper size in vb.net 2010.
Below is my source to create a new paper size:
Dim pkCustomSize1 As New PaperSize("CustomSize", 100, 200)
But, i can't find this paper size in the Devices and Printers -> Print Server Properties.
Can anyone help how to create custom paper size by using vb.net?
Thank you
|
|
|
|
|
|
why is there no exclusive group for mvc while there is exclusive group for wfc wpf etc..?
|
|
|
|
|
This is not the place for such questions, try Bugs 'n' Sugs.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Richard
Where is Bugs and Sugs. I couldn't find it?
T?hanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because it can't exist without ASP.NET. Ask whatever question you have in that forum.
|
|
|
|
|
So you think wcf can exist without asp.net? Doesn't make sense.
|
|
|
|
|
I was only commenting on MVC and, typically, the one that runs on top of ASP.NET.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, yes it can. WCF doesn't rely on ASP.NET at all - granted, it's a common use case for it, but it doesn't rely on it being anywhere in the chain.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
There are already a lot of messages being posted somewhere which would better fit into another forum. If there was a forum for each and every technology or concept many people wouldn't find the right one anyway. If you'd asked me, I'd say let's merge some forums.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
