|
These leading-edge jobs could prove to be the most lucrative careers in tomorrow’s tech. Blurb writer still didn't make the list
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Blurb writer still didn't make the list
That's just because it's not a new job, Kent. I'm sure it's in the top spots of all-time greatest IT jobs! 
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
is this info private ,so that you are not letting anyone know :P ...
best of luck buddy !
|
|
|
|
|
From Juniper to Fortinet and Cisco, a lot of companies have been cited for having shipped products that contain hard-coded passcodes to market which poses security risks to the enterprise. How else am I supposed to connect to random wireless networks?
|
|
|
|
|
If you have in your possession a regular inkjet printer, a certain type of compatible ink, and fifteen minutes of spare time, then you could be well on your way to bypassing the biometric security on a smartphone. And here I thought they were 100% unbreakable
Like all the other security mechanisms before them
|
|
|
|
|
Just as secure as writing your pin on the wall next to the atm so you don't need to remember it. 
IMO At best they're suitable as a last step for cases where something else is able to provide 90% of a 2FA already. With either your home/work wifi or your smartwatch's bluetooth (if you're drinking that koolaid) as the primary "probably not stolen" indicator.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
The short explanation is: the committee failed to achieve consensus that Concepts, as specified in the TS, has attained sufficient implementation and usage experience to be confident in the current design. Basically, the committee did not say “no” to concepts, it said “not yet.” Not coming soon to a compiler near you
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Not coming soon to a compiler near you
Except that it probably will, the proposal wasn't mature enough to make the C++17 standard, with only a single implementation being a major factor, but:
Quote: I’m confident that Concepts, in some form, will be added to C++19/20. I expect all of gcc, Clang, and Visual C++ to be shipping implementations well before the next standard is complete, hopefully within the next year.
If you'll be able to use a beta standard in production code's another issue (and more about risk management than anything technical I suppose).
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
It was a bad concept. 
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
The only reliable, widely used way to ensure impeccable software quality is to write less software that does less stuff, and then spend eons honing that tiny lot. Obvious statement is obvious (but important to remember)
|
|
|
|
|
Human without mistake and Software without bug are near to impossible.
Thanks & Regards
Puneet Goel
Save Paper >> Save Tree >> Save Humanity
|
|
|
|
|
Windows now accounts for a mere 10% of the company’s revenue. You might not have seen this coming, but Microsoft did. Because (of course) it's The Year of Linux
I am nothing if not redundantly repetitive, right?
|
|
|
|
|
Well, if someone's hosting Linux VMs on Azure, that's good revenue for Microsoft!
|
|
|
|
|
There're lots of elephant droppings in that article;  starting back with the obfuscation that is the MS report itself. 
The breakdown used to write that dreck is:
http://zdnet2.cbsistatic.com/hub/i/r/2016/02/25/9a7158b6-1da2-4fb6-a499-c3c5c845e249/resize/770xauto/409d179d9b08c8b84781f62d84fd42e5/msft-revenue-1601.jpg[^]
Which puts consumer Windows at 10% of MS's revenue. That's not all the money they're getting from Windows (not even close).
You've also got "Windows (VL) and patent licensing". The first half of that category is the copy of Windows on your work computer (unless you work for a small business).
There's also "Server products, cloud services"; which includes whatever Windows server licenses you're using at work, any MS server applications (sql server, exchange, etc), and the azure cloud. The revenue picture for the latter is totally elephanteds all the way down.  MS is throwing in "free" Azure credits into their standard Software Assurance packages now (even if the customer says they don't want it  ) and using that to allocate some of the money from the SA agreement to Azure in the hope that at free the business will decide to try it for some experimental greenfield projects at which point it'll start growing on them. (Like a fungus. - Sarcasm courtesy of a former coworker re the Office 2007 ribbon.)
At the end of the day the actual amount of money they're getting from Windows is thoroughly obfuscated from everyone including most of MS; but is probably more like a quarter of the total; with office, all MS server products, all consumer products (gaming, surface, windows phone), being similar 15-25% guesstimated segments of the total.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Well subject headings are often hyperbolic, designed to grab attention!
Dan Neely wrote: At the end of the day the actual amount of money they're getting from Windows is thoroughly obfuscated from everyone including most of MS; but is probably more like a quarter of the total; with office, all MS server products, all consumer products (gaming, surface, windows phone), being similar 15-25% guesstimated segments of the total.
My take is that article is saying Windows revenue per se is far less important than it used to be. But obviously Windows itself is required to sell all their other stuff.
I think about a decade ago there was a three way split in revenue between Windows, Office and everything else, with profits being mostly 50-50 between Windows and Office. I assume the Windows share of profits is now much lower.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, MS has managed to grow a few other projects to a scale that matters to their bottom line, instead of Windows, Office, and Misc; it's Windows, Office, Server Apps, Xbox, and misc. Instead of a bipod, gone from a 3 legged stool, to a normal chair with cruft hanging down off the bottom where the seat fabric's a bit frayed. If the Surface line keeps growing in a few more years they could have a wheely chair built around 5 core business lines.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Of course the other 90% of their revenue needs Windows to run.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
|
This will enable SQL Server to deliver a consistent data platform across Windows Server and Linux, as well as on-premises and cloud. We are bringing the core relational database capabilities to preview today, and are targeting availability in mid-2017. Whaaaaaa?
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, that's one more thing from the "things I never thought I'd hear in my lifetime" box.
|
|
|
|
|
In an email to partners, seen by VentureBeat, Microsoft is now targeting a release this month. Both of the people who still have their Lumias will be delighted
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Both of the people who still have their Lumias will be delighted
Hey, that's me!
|
|
|
|
|
And I'm the other one! 
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
Visual Studio 2015 Update 2 release candidate speeds up C/C++ operations and fixes multiple performance issues. And of course, "Soup is good food"
Yeah. Pretty sad. I invite improvements, you're the funny ones after all.
|
|
|
|
|
I remember that ad well. Yes, I'm old as dirt.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
