|
How to secure web application not copy code
|
|
|
|
|
If you like to get a helpful answer you shouldn't use the subject line for the message body.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
|
Server-side code, or client-code?
The server-side code should not be viewable from the outside; the client code needs to be readable in order to execute.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
1. Please do not cross post.
2. You need to give a lot more detail to what you are asking.
3. If you build your code, then it is compiled. Anyone who has access to the server can copy it, but it is compiled so you shouldn't worry about it.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I was reading article on Garbage Collection. I have below queries-
1) There are many objects in my heap and stack and memory is getting low. How Garbage Collector will come to know which object to recollect?
2) Is there any property in object that tells GC that it can collect that object?
3) What is the need of three garbage collector generation? Where are these generations located(physical or logical)?
|
|
|
|
|
1. When the object goes out of scope, is disposed or otherwise has no references to it, it can be garbage collected.
2. The reference counter tells GC when it is ready to be swept up.
3. Not sure what that means.
|
|
|
|
|
Rahul Hanumant Chavan wrote: 3) What is the need of three garbage collector generation?
The need is so that the GC can optimize its behavior. It can be reasonably sure that older generations will not need to be collected.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
This is too big a topic to answer in a simple forum query - I suggest that this article[^] would be a valuable place to start your further reading.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: What is the need of three garbage collector generation? Where are these generations located(physical or logical)?
Different generations need to manage different kinds of objects. Small objects created locally in functions have small live time and small size. They should be controlled in different way comparing to big objects with high live time. Number of generations depends on GC realization.
Physical or logical - I do not understand exactly what do you mean, but if GC uses virtual memory it can be considered as logical.
|
|
|
|
|
hello
i wont a code send text par email en visual basic
thankx
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent. So you have the basics of your requirements. Now you need to start breaking your requirements down further. How is your text stored? Is it going to include none-text elements? Does it need to be formatted? Remember, as you pull your requirements together, you should consider the edge cases as well.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Once you have you're requirements laid out you might want to start your research into writing your own code by Googling for "VB.NET send email" and start reading.
If you thought someone here was just going to write your code for you, you've come to the wrong site.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 16-Mar-16 8:41am.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
i need bookmark functionality in asp.net web page. if i marked as bookmark a word or sentence in webpage, if i click on text or bookmark image need to show bookmark details
|
|
|
|
|
You need to bookmark the page in user's browser or just bookmark the page within application?
"You'd have to be a floating database guru clad in a white toga and ghandi level of sereneness to fix this goddamn clusterfuck.", BruceN[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
i dont want entire page bookmark in browser and bookmark the page with in application. I need bookmark like " Specific selected word bookmark in a webpage"
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think I understand what that means. Can you try to rephrase it without using the term bookmark?
"You'd have to be a floating database guru clad in a white toga and ghandi level of sereneness to fix this goddamn clusterfuck.", BruceN[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Store it in user cookies and retrieve it. Simple.
tf
|
|
|
|
|
Try the ASP.NET forum. Are you really talking about a link that launches a popup?
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 8-Mar-16 4:20am.
|
|
|
|
|
We have an enterprise application written in .NET WinForms with a SQL Server 2008 R2 database that exists on a classified, closed network. Users have Exchange email accounts on this network, but the mail service has turned from bad to awful. Our application has been using Database Mail to send automated messages, but due to "information assurance" reasons, this has been shut down on us. So since our overall mail experience is so crappy, our functional manager wants to create a "messaging" function within the application.
I would like to emulate the basics of Outlook (write message, reply, forward, Inbox, Sent Messages, Deleted items, etc) as much as possible, while storing the messages in our SQL Server database. I have tried searching for existing solutions that I could either use out-of-the box or use as a starting point that I could modify. So far I've had zero luck.
Does anyone know of anything remotely close to what I'm after. I'd rather not write this from scratch, but I guess if I do it might turn into a decent CP article, huh? 
|
|
|
|
|
So you are looking for an alternate UI for your exchange server's mail functionality? If yes, there is this little old article[^] you might start with (I just found it through search). Another one[^].
"You'd have to be a floating database guru clad in a white toga and ghandi level of sereneness to fix this goddamn clusterfuck.", BruceN[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
No, I need to take Exchange out of the picture. That's one of the two major problems we have. Our Exchange server was regionalized and its reliability is horrible.
I need a UI that is similar to Outlook (at least provides basic mail functionality) but the backend message store needs to be a table structure in SQL Server, not an Exchange server.
|
|
|
|
|
You trying to put a band-aid over a shotgun wound.
The correct course here is to fix the Exchange infrastructure. Without it, your entire business suffers, not just your website.
So, without the SMTP or IMAP server in Exchange, how are you even going to send the emails? The only way for someone to check for any messages would be to login to the website. You really expect customers to do that?
Or perhaps you haven't completely described who is using the email portions of your site and from where.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
