|
Quote: ...FrontPage
Adobe Fireworks, Adobe Dreamweaver .... And the UI is horrible.
|
|
|
|
|
NASA's attempt at deploying the first inflatable habitat on the International Space Station failed yesterday because the habitat hit some higher-than-expected forces during its expansion, NASA officials said during a press briefing today. Friction: ruining physics since 1687
|
|
|
|
|
I don't suppose one of the astronauts could get out and just jump up and down on the thing. 
[edit]Never mind, they got it inflated[^] [/edit]
Marc
modified 29-May-16 17:27pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Friction: ruining physics since 1687
The bastard Newton and his laws; who did he think he was?
|
|
|
|
|
I really think this has been blown out of proportion.
|
|
|
|
|
I can think of lots of reasons to delay a video game, and zero reasons to threaten to kill someone because a video game was delayed. Everyone knows you should only make death threats over political opinions
{not}
|
|
|
|
|
 What is WRONG with people?!??! Seriously? Death threats over a F****** VIDEO GAME RELEASE DELAY?!??!?! GET A F****** LIFE, MORONS! THE WORLD DOESN'T REVOLVE AROUND YOU!
Gawd, I hate people sometimes.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Only at times? 
|
|
|
|
|
That's why I don't like people... 
Luckily those people are only hardcore with their keyboards.
Contrary to popular belief they have never killed or physically injured anyone (it would require them to get out of their room, besides their mommies wouldn't let them).
Also, they never actually slept with your mother
Now you better have that CodeProject update ready and on time, or else...! 
|
|
|
|
|
A death threat might be the next step in the Quick Answers forum, after "I need this code ASAP, write my code now!!" .
|
|
|
|
|
Death threat from Q to A or from A to Q (I'm guessing both)? 
|
|
|
|
|
Developers shouldn't celebrate Google's win in this hard-fought copyright case. If at first you fail, cry cry again
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: unauthorized, commercial, competitive, harmful use of software
Says who? Not the court for sure!
Quote: you can kiss GPL (general public license) goodbye
Or maybe kiss Java goodbye? (How pitty Oracle can't win back the money invested in buying it)
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Oracle is dumber than a microwave safe ice cube tray. They are just trying to fear-monger.
Get over it Oracle, you bunch of crybabies.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
I've long maintained that the key portions of GPL are indefensible in court, which is why the FSF has avoided going to court by settling.
A quote in the article is truly bizarre:
"Free stuff from Google does not mean free in the sense Richard Stallman ever intended it."
Which should also be modified to state:
"Free, as defined by Richard Stallman, doesn't mean what you think it means [it isn't free at all.]"
[Edit: Richard Stallman's definition of free is: What's mine is mine and what's yours is mine."
|
|
|
|
|
Wall Street Journal, May 27, "Facebook Wants to Help Sell Every Ad on the Web" [^]: "Quote: To date, Facebook has only showed ads across its Audience Network to Facebook users, targeted based on information the company has collected about its users’ tastes and behaviors. Now Facebook plans to collect information about all Internet users, through “like” buttons and other pieces of code present on Web pages across the Internet. It will then use the information it collects to target ads to non-Facebook users.
"Surely ... not moi !
«There is a spectrum, from "clearly desirable behaviour," to "possibly dodgy behavior that still makes some sense," to "clearly undesirable behavior." We try to make the latter into warnings or, better, errors. But stuff that is in the middle category you don’t want to restrict unless there is a clear way to work around it.» Eric Lippert, May 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Moi, certainement pas... J'espère.... I hope ... hoffe ich ... espero 
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah but who will over seeing the over see'r?
That proverbial eye in the sky?
New version: WinHeist Version 2.2.2 Beta I told my psychiatrist that I was hearing voices in my head. He said you don't have a psychiatrist!
|
|
|
|
|
Time to develop 'Likes blocker' 
|
|
|
|
|
adblocker already does that
|
|
|
|
|
Damn, they stole my idea
|
|
|
|
|
Time to not bother to sign up.
Check..
Done.
|
|
|
|
|
RossMW wrote: Time to not bother to sign up.
As it was going to do such a big difference 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Good luck with that, Faceplant.
I block 100% of all Internet ads. Also, 100% of all radio, TV, telemarketer ads.
Any spam I get in the mail I use to start my wood-stove.
I pity the people who use that "service" and willingly give their private information to them.
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: "Surely ... not moi !
If it comes to click the "like" buttons... surely neither moi.
The problem is, that I don't think it is even needed to click them
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
