|
Hi, I just need instructions to build my working source code in C++ into a dll that is compatible with Windows 7.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assuming that your code has no linux OS calls in it and is just generic stuff you just define an interface for it and compile it like Jochen's answer.
If you have linux OS calls you will need to build windows replacements or use a framework.
In vino veritas
modified 29-Jun-16 13:29pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I need your help a bit in C++.
I am coding a dll but my source code has 2 errors.
Both issues stem from the same declaration in my header file.
void execute_assert(bool expr, std::string str);
When I do the function calls...
v_assert(s = MAX_ACL_DEPTH, "MAX_ACL_DEPTH too small");
and
v_assert(s < 1, "Illegal acl size (" + deb + ")");
I get the error message...
Error: too many arguments to function ‘void execute_assert(bool, std::string)’
On both counts, the parameter count is ok, so what's the problem?
Please help.
|
|
|
|
|
Does v_assert() call execute_assert() or vice-versa?
Member 12244972 wrote:
v_assert(s = MAX_ACL_DEPTH, "MAX_ACL_DEPTH too small");
Shouldn't this be:
v_assert(s == MAX_ACL_DEPTH, "MAX_ACL_DEPTH too small"); or maybe
v_assert((s == MAX_ACL_DEPTH), "MAX_ACL_DEPTH too small");
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
I was making the wrong function call.
v_assert(s = MAX_ACL_DEPTH, "MAX_ACL_DEPTH too small");
should have been
execute_assert(s = MAX_ACL_DEPTH, "MAX_ACL_DEPTH too small");
Problem fixed.
Thanks all.
|
|
|
|
|
Where is the definition of v_assert, is is a macro?
|
|
|
|
|
I was making the wrong function call.
v_assert(s = MAX_ACL_DEPTH, "MAX_ACL_DEPTH too small");
should have been
<pre>execute_assert(s = MAX_ACL_DEPTH, "MAX_ACL_DEPTH too small");
Problem fixed.
Thanks all.
|
|
|
|
|
I am trying to output certain int variables to my logfile. But upon viewing the logfile these varuiables are shown in hex. any idea why this happens?
ofstream logfile;
GetLocalTime(&st);
sprintf(logfilename,"Myfilename_%d%02d%02d.log",st.wYear,st.wMonth,st.wDay);
logfile.open(logfilename, ios::app);
logfile <<"# Time is :: "<
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know why your stream uses hex format here. But you can set the format: ios_base::fmtflags - C++ Reference[^].
Because you are still using the C library function sprintf for the file name you might use it also for formatting the output. I still prefer this because it is often simpler (e.g. for date and times with leading zeroes).
|
|
|
|
|
I just ran the above code and the values are all in decimal. There must be something else in your code that is causing the issue.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually this is only a part of the code. I have int variables declared and those are also displayed in hex in the logfile.
will it have something to do with the settings while I build the same in Visual C++?
|
|
|
|
|
No, but somewhere you are setting the stream attributes to display all integers in HEX rather than DEC format.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks a lot.. There are instances in the code where the stream is set to hex. Upon removal the same works fine.
But is there a way without removing hex and set the stream back to display DEC ?
|
|
|
|
|
Found out the way to do that without actually removing Hex. Used <
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I have a for loop parallelized with openMP. Inside I want to catch possible exceptions. My idea is that the caught exception should be a private variable, as it is possible that several exception occur parallel. But I cannot express this.
example:
#pragma omp parallel for default(none)
for ( int i = 0; i < 10; ++ i )
{
try
{
}
catch ( const std::exception& e )
{
e;
}
}
This yields to compiler error:
error C3052: 'e' : variable doesn't appear in a data-sharing clause under a default(none) clause
But I cannot mark the exception variable as private, as I is not known at that scope.
I can bypass the compiler error by changing the default sharing behaviour to shared, but I think this could lead to a runtime error, if two exceptions occur at the same time.
What is the correct way to deal with this?
Thanks in advance,
Joerg
|
|
|
|
|
I've got an application which has two dialogs, I use a deque and Direct2D in one dialog within a thread. Now, if I close the application via handling WM_CLOSE I have no problem but when I try and close it by clicking on 'Close Window' in the task bar or using Alt F4 I get a breakpoint triggered on
if (!HeapFree(select_heap(block), 0, block))
I know it's a long shot since I have given so little detail - but seeing as the difference seems to be in the way I close the app down I was hoping there might be a quick and easy fix for this.
Yours hopefully,
Ben
*Update since I posted in this it the next door forum, this morning, by mistake: I still get the same error if the thread (and hence the direct2d drawing) isn't running. Perhaps it is something to do with the way I set up the dialogs.
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't the WM_CLOSE message being sent whether you terminate the app via Task Manager or by using Alt+F4?
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your reply!
I don't know, to be honest. The problem was occurring when I AltF4ed or clicked on Close Window but not when I clicked on my 'Exit' button. However, it looks like it was a corrupt memory problem I had with a member variable I'd assigned to the heap and was using to pass data between threads.
I've changed the communication to the following:
In the sending thread:
ControlDlg * pParent = (ControlDlg *) this->GetParent();
ColourAlphaEnvelope * s = new ColourAlphaEnvelope;
*s = m_ColourEnvelope;
pParent->PostMessage(CM_COLOURBOUNDS, reinterpret_cast<WPARAM>(s));
and in the recieving dialog I used
afx_msg LRESULT CRectArtDlg::OnCmColourbounds(WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
{
std::auto_ptr<ColourAlphaEnvelope> s(reinterpret_cast<ColourAlphaEnvelope*>(wParam));
m_colourEnvelope = *s;
return 0;
}
I bet there are dozens of better ways of doing this (not least since a quick Google reveals that auto_ptr is depracated) but I haven't had a crash and the compiler isn't telling me there is a memory leak.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
i am developing client program using WSAAsyncselect() in Winsock2.
i have few queries regarding FD_WRITE.
i understood that when client is connected to server. There will be FD_WRITE event posted stating that we can send the data to server. However, i want to send data to server based on some other events that the application is interested in. i am not quite sure how the FD_WRITE event will be fired when i want send data to server.
here is the pseudo.
LRESULT CALLBACK WndProc(HWND hWnd, UINT message, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
{
switch (message)
{
case WM_SOMEOTHEREVENT:
break;
case WM_SOCKET:
switch (WSAGETSELECTEVENT(lParam))
{
case FD_WRITE:
break;
}
break;
}
return 0;
}
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
Your application will receive an FD_WRITE event shortly after a connection is made. If your "write" operation receives a WSAEWOULDBLOCK result, your application will find out that sends are again possible when an FD_WRITE network event is recorded and the associated event object is set.
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
Hi David,
Thanks for your reply.
i am sorry, i couldn't get what you mean.
i understand that application will receive an FD_WRITE event shortly after a connection is made but there is no data to send at that time.
here is scenario i am trying for
1) connect to server
2) Connection established - FD_WRITE event is receive.
3) there is no data to send to server
4) some other event fired (not related to socket) -- data arrived, so store the data.
5) now data is available to send to server
in the above steps 4 and 5 will happen one after the another. how can i raise FD_Write event after the data is available (means step 4) ?
|
|
|
|
|
Vijjuuu. wrote: how can i raise FD_Write event after the data is available (means step 4) ?
Why would you need to raise the FD_WRITE event? It is sent to your application to let it know that it can now send data to the socket.
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks again David,
i understood that its lets application know that it can send data to the socket, but when there is no data to send ?
and does it mean after initial FD_Write (the time after connection established) , FD_WRITE will be polled to application to let know that it can send data ?
i really appreciate your patience. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Vijjuuu. wrote: ...but when there is no data to send ?
Then don't send any.
Vijjuuu. wrote:
and does it mean after initial FD_Write (the time after connection established) , FD_WRITE will be polled to application to let know that it can send data ?
Did you read the documentation that goes with that event? Your application gets the initial FD_WRITE event which means it can start sending data to the socket. In the event that whatever "send" function you are using returns WSAEWOULDBLOCK, you would then have to wait for the next FD_WRITE event to resume sending data to the socket.
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
