Click here to Skip to main content
15,913,486 members

Welcome to the Lounge

   

For discussing anything related to a software developer's life but is not for programming questions. Got a programming question?

The Lounge is rated Safe For Work. If you're about to post something inappropriate for a shared office environment, then don't post it. No ads, no abuse, and no programming questions. Trolling, (political, climate, religious or whatever) will result in your account being removed.

 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Chris Maunder21-Jul-16 8:09
cofounderChris Maunder21-Jul-16 8:09 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Gary Wheeler22-Jul-16 1:05
Gary Wheeler22-Jul-16 1:05 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Vark11121-Jul-16 7:47
Vark11121-Jul-16 7:47 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
OriginalGriff21-Jul-16 8:02
mveOriginalGriff21-Jul-16 8:02 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Nish Nishant21-Jul-16 8:13
sitebuilderNish Nishant21-Jul-16 8:13 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
CPallini21-Jul-16 21:18
mveCPallini21-Jul-16 21:18 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Harley L. Pebley22-Jul-16 8:52
Harley L. Pebley22-Jul-16 8:52 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
BillWoodruff24-Jul-16 15:16
professionalBillWoodruff24-Jul-16 15:16 
Very interesting Nish,

I was puzzled by the omission of a Type argument to NoEx.Run, and realize that my habit of always writing out the Type arguments wasn't necessary in this case. I've made a note to try and find more information on exactly when the compiler can infer the Type which renders including the Type an option.

thanks !
«There is a spectrum, from "clearly desirable behaviour," to "possibly dodgy behavior that still makes some sense," to "clearly undesirable behavior." We try to make the latter into warnings or, better, errors. But stuff that is in the middle category you don’t want to restrict unless there is a clear way to work around it.» Eric Lippert, May 14, 2008

GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter21-Jul-16 8:29
professionalKornfeld Eliyahu Peter21-Jul-16 8:29 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Brisingr Aerowing21-Jul-16 9:59
professionalBrisingr Aerowing21-Jul-16 9:59 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Jörgen Andersson21-Jul-16 10:09
professionalJörgen Andersson21-Jul-16 10:09 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Foothill21-Jul-16 10:55
professionalFoothill21-Jul-16 10:55 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Chris Maunder21-Jul-16 11:02
cofounderChris Maunder21-Jul-16 11:02 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Foothill21-Jul-16 11:08
professionalFoothill21-Jul-16 11:08 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Richard Deeming22-Jul-16 1:58
mveRichard Deeming22-Jul-16 1:58 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Joe Woodbury21-Jul-16 10:56
professionalJoe Woodbury21-Jul-16 10:56 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
PIEBALDconsult21-Jul-16 14:29
mvePIEBALDconsult21-Jul-16 14:29 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
BillWoodruff21-Jul-16 15:46
professionalBillWoodruff21-Jul-16 15:46 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Roger Wright21-Jul-16 20:55
professionalRoger Wright21-Jul-16 20:55 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Duncan Edwards Jones21-Jul-16 21:09
professionalDuncan Edwards Jones21-Jul-16 21:09 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Dan Neely22-Jul-16 2:55
Dan Neely22-Jul-16 2:55 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
Chris Maunder22-Jul-16 3:50
cofounderChris Maunder22-Jul-16 3:50 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
TheGreatAndPowerfulOz22-Jul-16 3:42
TheGreatAndPowerfulOz22-Jul-16 3:42 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
agolddog22-Jul-16 3:45
agolddog22-Jul-16 3:45 
GeneralRe: How about new syntactical sugar for exception checking? Pin
englebart22-Jul-16 4:29
professionalenglebart22-Jul-16 4:29 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Praise Praise    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.