|
Both. It's probably got to do with what it uses to do what it does (some java/scripting thing the DoD doesn't trust). When I come up with a tip/article at work that I want to at least start, I have to actually type in the editor. That's not the way I like to do it - I type the article and embed source snippets in a HTML file using Visual Studio, and then copy/paste the whole thing in at once into the CP article editor, allowing me to get in and get out in less than a minute.
In today's case, I have three tips that kinda sorta depend on each other, so I can queue them all up at once, and all I have to do is paste the links to the others, and I'm done. As it sits, I have to put said html files into a ZIP, upload them to my upload area here, and when I get home, download them and post the articles. To say that's a bit of a pain in the ass is an understatement.
I just wanted to let y'all know that I can't paste from work (and didn't expect you to be able to do anything about it).
FWIW, one of the other guys here said he can't paste into FarceBook (probably using the same/similar editor techniques/library as CP's article editor).
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
It's probably to stop you posting secrets.
...because zipping them and uploading those secrets would never be something you do, right?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Only seen this in QA and only when adding Solutions (although I don't paste a lot into comments). It also isn't every time - once I've managed to paste something into the solution once it seems to be ok.
Mainly seen in pasting links ... I see the "http://..." but as it converts to a hyperlink it becomes "tp://" (which is then not recognised as a link).
Have also seen it on Code Blocks ... sql "SELECT ..." becomes <pre>ELECT...
|
|
|
|
|
Which browser?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
It happens to me in IE11 (at work) if I don't put two spaces on the line before pasting. I don't recall if this is also a problem at home (using FF).
I reported this a couple months back...
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
*hanging head in shame*
IE11
I'll swap back over to Chrome and see if it goes away
*picks up coat on way out*
|
|
|
|
|
|
I changed my email for my codeproject account. Somewhere in the process I was told I would receive an email as part of the process. I never received any email. I am now logged in via G+. I want to get back to my original codeproject account.
I have tried logging in with both the old and new email addresses. No luck either way.
|
|
|
|
|
I've sent you an email to help you out with this. We'll get it sorted.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
I guess the only place we have it currently is in as part of the actual submission wizard. They're pretty rare ...
"A Reference article is a short (typically 1 page) article used to lookup common information such as tables (eg. ASCII tables, HTTP codes etc) or function or class explanations. Typically there will be few if any images, and no downloadable code (though both are possible if the author wishes)"
I have changed the type on the article.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
I understand the fact that these discussions have been underwent here a lot of times before, but I really think that the solution is needed.
For example, when a question is closed due to any reporting reason, everything about that question is hidden as well, such as comments, solutions etc. Which is not an ideal case. Everything about that question is there, comments are there, solutions and comments to them are there as well. So why hide them only?
My simple proposal is, lock the thread for new solutions, but leave comments and solutions available. Lock the thread for further solutions, as long as the thread remains locked, but allow interactions in comments, or at least let the readers view comments etc so that they know why the post was locked.
Many posts are locked, yet they have some sense in them and a real world problem, only we cannot reproduce it here, so the post gets locked. I really think, this needs to be rectified as OP does not even get a chance to see any suggestion, any comment, and the thread gets locked away.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
The OP can still see the replies via the email that is sent though
|
|
|
|
|
In my eyes the problem isn't that questions get closed. It's that the wrong questions are closed (or aren't closed).
A question that has no value, or is spam, abusive, contains inappropriate content or simply has no redeeming values should be closed and it should not be available to anyone. It's noise.
If a question truly has value then it can be reopened.
Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan wrote: yet they have some sense in them and a real world problem
This can certainly happen, but if the specific problem came up again for someone then it would be posted as a new, and hopefully more reasonably phrased question.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I've followed all the steps, category, tags, etc. and now I want to write the content of my article, but the HTML editor is disabled.
|
|
|
|
|
Which browser are you using?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chrome, Chris, but last night I found it behaving buggy, and had to restart. Doesn't often happen with Windows 10  I'll try again this morning.
|
|
|
|
|
It would be great if a moderator can specify a comment/reason as to why an article being reported as Unclear or Incomplete, Extremely poor quality,Off-topic, Spam/abusive, etc...
I also think the Spam/Abusive should be separated into two categories.
|
|
|
|
|
You can use the Comments section at the bottom of the article - use the "Add a Comment or Question" button.
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
The comment area doesn't appear for blogs right away. It has to be approved for publication first.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
True, I forgot that. Probably needs fixing.
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
Nope,
Having a conversion with a spammer is not my idea of forwarding the rights of programmers at cp. Do nothing. As best as you can.
|
|
|
|
|
For spam, plagiarism, and abuse, I agree - but when a blog comes in that is unclear, or very poor quality it could only help improve the document and the site if we can talk to the author and tell him what we feel it lacks. Otherwise, he just gets a rejection without any idea of the detail of why. That doesn't really help anyone, does it?
I don't think the idea suggested is that a comment should be compulsory - just that it should be possible.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
So you're suggesting that there should be a way of commenting without using any of the reasons to dismiss the dialog by clicking on the categorical nexus.
That's your best? Ok, I buy that.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
